The psychometric properties of a 14-item bidimensional Mathematics Anxiety Scale—Revised (MAS-R) were empirically cross-validated with two independent samples consisting of 647 secondary school students. An exploratory factor analysis on the scale yielded strong construct validity with a clear two-factor structure. The results from a confirmatory factor analysis indicated an excellent model-fit (χ 2 = 98.32, df = 62; normed fit index = .92, comparative fit index = .97; root mean square error of approximation = .04). The internal consistency (.85), test—retest reliability (.71), interfactor correlation (.26, p < .001), and positive discrimination power indicated that MAS-R is a psychometrically reliable and valid instrument for measuring mathematics anxiety. Math anxiety, as measured by MAS-R, correlated negatively with student achievement scores (r = -.38), suggesting that MAS-R may be a useful tool for classroom teachers and other educational personnel tasked with identifying students at risk of reduced math achievement because of anxiety.
Arbuckle, J.L. ( 2006). Amos (Version 7.0.0) [Computer software]. Spring House, PA: Amos Development Corporation .
2.
Ashcraft, M.H., & Ridley, K.S. ( 2005). Math anxiety and its cognitive consequences: A tutorial review. In J. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 315-327). New York: Psychology Press.
3.
Bagozzi, R.P., & Yi, Y. ( 1988). On the evaluation of structure equation models . Journal of Academy of Marketing and Science, 16, 14-21.
4.
Bai, H., Wang, L., Pan, W., & Frey, M. ( 2009). Measuring mathematics anxiety: Psychometric analysis of a bidimensional affective scale. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 36, 185-193.
5.
Bender, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. ( 1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin , 88, 588-606.
6.
Betz, N.E. ( 1978). Prevalence, distribution, and correlates of math anxiety in college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology , 25, 441-448.
7.
Byrne, B.M. ( 1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
Cates, G.L., & Rhymer, K.N. ( 2003). Examining the relationship between mathematics anxiety and mathematics performance: An instructional hierarchy perspective . Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 23-34.
9.
Dew, K.M.H., Galassi, J.P., & Galassi, M.D. ( 1983). Mathematics anxiety: Some basic issues. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30, 443-446.
10.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. ( 1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research , 18, 39-50.
11.
Hembree, R. ( 1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety . Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 33-46.
12.
Hopko, D., Mahadevan, R., Bare, R., & Hunt, M. ( 2003). The abbreviated math anxiety scale (AMAS). Assessment, 1, 178-182.
13.
Horn, J.L. ( 1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
14.
Jaccard, J., & Wan, C.K. ( 1995). Measurement error in the analysis of interaction effects between continuous predictors using multiple regression: Multiple indicator and structural equation approaches. Psychological Bulletin , 117, 348-357.
15.
Kazelskis, R. ( 1998). Some dimensions of mathematics anxiety: A factor analysis across instruments. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 58, 623-634.
16.
Kline, R.B. ( 1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling . New York: Guilford.
17.
Ma, X. ( 1999). A meta-analysis of the relationship between anxiety toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 520-540.
18.
Marshall, G.N., Wortman, C.B., Kusuals, J.W., Herving, L.K., & Vickers, R.R. ( 1992). Distinguishing optimism from pessimism: Relations to fundamental dimensions of mood and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1067-1074.
19.
McLeod, D.B. ( 1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization . In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575-596). New York: Macmillan .
20.
McMorris, R.F. ( 2004). Review of mathematics anxiety rating scale. In Mental measurements yearbook (Accession No. 11080864). Fort Collins, CO: Rocky Mountain Behavioral Science Institute.
21.
Newstead, K. (1998). Aspects of children’s mathematics anxiety. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36, 53-71.
22.
O’Connor, B.P. ( 2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 32, 396-402.
23.
Pajares, F., & Miller, M.D. ( 1994). The role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem-solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 193-203.
24.
Pajares, F., & Urdan, T. ( 1996). An exploratory factor analysis of the Mathematics Anxiety Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development , 29, 35-47.
25.
Plake, B.S., & Parker, C.S. ( 1982). The development and validation of a revised version of the Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 551-557.
26.
Ramirez, O.M., & Dockweiler, C.J. (1987). Mathematics anxiety: A systematic review. In R. Schwarzer, H. M. Van Der Ploeg, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in test anxiety research (Vol. 5, pp. 157-175). Berwyn, PA : Swets North America.
27.
Richardson, F.C., & Suinn, R.M. ( 1972). The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale: Psychometric data . Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19, 551-554.
28.
Richardson, F.C., & Woolfolk, R.L. (1980). Mathematics anxiety. In I. G. Sarason (Ed.), Test anxiety: Theory, research, and application. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29.
Ryan, K.E., & Ryan, A.M. ( 2005). Psychological processes underlying stereotype threat and standardized math test performance. Educational Psychologist , 40, 53-63.
30.
SAS Institute, Inc. (2008). SAS/STAT user’s guide, Version 9.1. Cary, NC: Author.
31.
Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. ( 2002). Mathematics and science achievement effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 95, 323-332.
32.
Suinn, R.M., & Edwards, R. ( 1982). The measurement of mathematics anxiety: The mathematics anxiety rating scale for adolescents: MARS-A. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 576-580.
33.
Suinn, R.M., Taylor, S., & Edwards, R.W. ( 1988). Suinn mathematics anxiety rating scale for elementary school students (MARS-E): Psychometric and normative data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 979-986.
34.
Tellegen, A. ( 1985). Structures of mood and personality and their relevance to assessing anxiety, with an emphasis on self-report. In A. H. Tuma & J. D. Maser (Eds.), Anxiety and anxiety disorders (pp. 681-706). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbanm.
35.
Velicer, W.F. ( 1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321-327.
36.
Velicer, W.F., Eaton, C.A., & Fava, J.L. ( 2000). Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components. In R. D. Goffin & E. Helmes (Eds.), Problems and solutions in human assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy (pp. 41-77). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
37.
Watson, D., & Clark, L.A. ( 1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465-490.
38.
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. ( 1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
39.
Zwick, W.R., & Velicer, W.F. ( 1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432-442.
