A revised version of the Fennema-Sherman Mathematics Anxiety Scale (FSMAS-R) was assessed for its factor structure, reliability, and validity with 1,601 pretertiary students. Factor analyses supported a two-factor model. The construct validity of the FSMAS-R was demonstrated through intercorrelations between subscales and correlations with self-confidence and mathematics achievement test scores.
AikenL. R. (1974). Two scales of attitude toward mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 5(2), 67–71.
2.
AshcraftM. H. (2002). Math anxiety: Personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 181–185.
3.
BaiH.WangL. S.PanW.FreyM. (2009). Measuring mathematics anxiety: Psychometric analysis of a bidimensional affective scale. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 36, 185–193.
4.
BellJ. (1987). Doing your research project. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
5.
BetzN. E. (1978). Prevalence, distribution, and correlates of math anxiety in college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 25, 441–448.
6.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–161). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
ByrneB. M. (1989). A primer of LISREL: Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
8.
ChipmanS. F.KrantzD. H.SilverR. (1992). Mathematics anxiety and science careers among able college women. Psychological Science, 3, 292–295.
9.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
CooperS. E.RobinsonD. A. G. (1991). The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy beliefs to mathematics anxiety and performance. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 24, 4–11.
11.
DewK. M. H.GalassiJ. P.GalassiM. D. (1983). Mathematics anxiety: Some basic issues. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 30, 443–446.
12.
EvansJ. (2001). Adults’ mathematical thinking and emotions: A study of numerate practices. New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
FaustM. W.AshcraftM. H.FleckD. E. (1996). Mathematics anxiety effects in simple and complex addition. Mathematical Cognition, 2, 25-62.
14.
FennemaE.ShermanJ. A. (1976). Fennema-Sherman Mathematics Attitudes Scales: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by males and females. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7, 324–326.
15.
HembreeR. (1990). The nature, effects and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 33–46.
16.
HouserR. (1998). Counseling and educational research: Evaluation and application. London, England: Sage.
17.
HuL.-T.BentlerP. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and application (pp. 76–99). London, England: Sage.
18.
LimS. Y.ChapmanE. (2012). Development of a short form of the Attitudes Toward Mathematics Inventory. Educational Studies in Mathematics: An International Journal. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10649-012-9414-x
19.
MaX. (1999). A meta-analysis of the relationship between anxiety toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 520–540.
20.
MaX.KishorN. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 26–47.
21.
MarshallG. N.WortmanC. B.KusualsJ. W.HervingL. K.VickersR. R. (1992). Distinguishing optimism from pessimism: Relations to fundamental dimensions of mood and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1067–1074.
22.
McLeodD. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In GrouwsD. A. (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575–596). New York, NY: Macmillan.
23.
McLeodD. B. (1994). Research on affect in mathematics learning in the JRME: 1970 to the present. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 637–647.
MulhernF.RaeG. (1998). Development of a shortened form of the Fennema–Sherman Mathematics Attitudes Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 295–306.
26.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
27.
O’NealM. R.ErnestP. S.McLeanJ. E.TempletonS. M. (1998, November). Factorial validity of the Fennema–Sherman Attitudes Scales. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Louisville, KY. (Retrieved from ERIC database, ED303493)
28.
PajaresF.KranzlerJ. (1995). Self-efficacy beliefs and general mental ability in mathematical problem-solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 426–443.
29.
PajaresF.UrdanT. (1996). An exploratory factor analysis of the Mathematics Anxiety Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 29, 35–47.
30.
RichardsonF. C.SuinnR. M. (1972). The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale: Psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19, 551–554.
31.
ScheierM. R.CarverC. S. (1985). Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health Psychology, 4, 219–247.
32.
SchwarzerR.SeippB.SchwarzerC. (1989). Mathematics performance and anxiety: A meta-analysis. In SchwarzerR.Van Der PloegH. M.SpeilbergerC. D. (Eds.), Advances in test anxiety research (pp. 105–119). Berwyn, PA: Swets North America.
33.
TanakaJ. S. (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural equation models. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 10–39). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
TapiaM.MarshG. E.II. (2004). An instrument to measure mathematics attitudes. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8(2), 16–21.
35.
WigfieldA.MeeceJ. (1988). Math anxiety in elementary and secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 210–216.
36.
ZakariaE.NordinN. M. (2008). The effects of mathematics anxiety on matriculation students as related to motivation and achievement. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 4(1), 27–30.
