Agreement between adolescents, mothers, fathers, and teachers on adolescents’ personality traits was investigated in a longitudinal study. The targets for personality ratings were the adolescents who participated in the European Youth Heart Study in Estonia. There were 593 participants in the first wave and 480 participants in the follow-up study 3 years later. Adolescents’ self-reports as well as father, mother, and teacher ratings were collected using questionnaires to measure the five-factor model of personality. In both waves, inter-rater agreement was highest between mothers and fathers, was low to moderate for parent-self ratings, and was lowest for ratings between self and teacher, mother and teacher, and father and teacher. Test-retest correlations were moderate for parent and self-ratings but failed to reach statistical significance for three of the five teacher-rated traits, suggesting lower reliability of teacher ratings. Possible explanations for the low agreement between teachers and other judges are discussed.
Achenbach, T. M., McConaughy, S. H., & Howell, C. T. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213-232.
2.
Allik, J., Laidra, K., Realo, A., & Pullmann, H. (2004). Personality development from 12 to 18 years of age: Changes in mean levels and structure of traits. European Journal of Personality, 18, 445-462.
3.
Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). On judging and being judged accurately in zero-acquaintance situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 518-529.
4.
Baker, S. R., Victor, J. B., Chambers, A. L., & Halverson, C. F., Jr. (2004). Adolescent personality: A five-factor model construct validation. Assessment, 11, 303-315.
5.
Banai, E., Weller, A., & Mikulincer, M. (1998). Inter-judge agreement in evaluation of adult attachment style: The impact of acquaintanceship. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 95-109.
6.
Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., Rabasca, A., & Pastorelli, C. (2003). A questionnaire for measuring the Big Five in late childhood. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 645-664.
7.
Bates, C., & Nettelbeck, T. (2001). Primary school teachers’ judgements of reading achievement. Educational Psychology, 21, 177-187.
8.
Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1993). Convergence of stranger ratings of personality and intelligence with self-ratings, partner ratings, and measured intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 546-553.
9.
Borkenau, P., Mauer, N., Riemann, R., Spinath, F. M., & Angleitner, A. (2004). Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 599-614.
10.
Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., & Hamaker, C. (2000). Intellectual ability, learning style, personality, achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 1057-1068.
11.
Colvin, C. R., & Funder, D. C. (1991). Predicting personality and behavior: A boundary on the acquaintanceship effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 884-894.
12.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEOFFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
13.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (2002). Looking backward: Changes in the mean levels of personality traits from 80 to 12. In D. Cervone & W. Mischel (Eds.), Advances in personality science (pp. 219-237). New York: Guilford.
14.
Davis, M. H., & Kraus, L. A. (1997). Personality and empathic accuracy. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Empathic accuracy (pp. 144-168). New York: Guilford.
15.
De Fruyt, F., Mervielde, I., Hoekstra, H. A., & Rolland, J-P. (2000). Assessing adolescents’ personality with the NEO-PI-R. Assessment, 7, 329-345.
16.
De Fruyt, F., & Vollrath, M. (2003). Inter-parent agreement on higher and lower level traits in two countries: Effects of parent and child gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 189-301.
17.
De Raad, B. (1996). Personality traits in learning and education. European Journal of Personality, 10, 185-200.
18.
Duhig, A. M., Renk, K., Epstein, M. K., & Phares, V. (2000). Interparental agreement on internalizing, externalizing, and total behavior problems: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 7, 435-453.
19.
Epkins, C. C. (1996). Parent ratings of children’s depression, anxiety, and aggression: A cross-sample analysis of agreement and differences with child and teacher ratings. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 52, 599-608.
20.
Epkins, C. C., & Meyers, A. W. (1994). Assessment of childhood depression, anxiety, and aggression: Convergent and discriminant validity of self-, parent-, teacher-, and peer-report measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 62, 364-381.
21.
Feinberg, A. B., & Shapiro, E. S. (2003). Accuracy of teacher judgements in predicting oral reading fluency. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 52-65.
22.
Funder, D. C. (1999). Personality judgement: A realistic approach to person perception. San Diego: Academic Press.
23.
Funder, D. C., & Colvin, C. R. (1988). Friends and strangers: Acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 149-158.
24.
Funder, D. C., Kolar, D. C., & Blackman, M. C. (1995). Agreement among judges of personality: Interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintanceship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 656-672.
25.
Gray, E. K., & Watson, D. (2002). General and specific-traits of personality and their relation to sleep and academic performance. Journal of Personality, 70, 177-206.
26.
Harris, J. R. (1998). The nurture assumption: Why children turn out the way they do. New York: Free Press.
27.
Harro, M., Eensoo, D., Kiive, E., Merenäkk, L., Alep, J., Oreland, L., & Harro, J. (2001). Platelet monoamine oxidase in healthy 9- and 15-years old children: The effect of gender, smoking and puberty. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 25, 1497-1511.
28.
Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 12-19.
29.
John, O. P., Caspi, A., Robins, R. W., Moffitt, T. E., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1994). The ”little five”: Exploring the nomological network of the five-factor model of personality in adolescent boys. Child Development, 65, 160-178.
30.
Kallasmaa, T., Allik, J., Realo, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2000). The Estonian version of the NEO-PI-R: An examination of universal and culture-specific aspects of the five-factor model. European Journal of Personality, 14, 265-278.
31.
Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford.
32.
Markey, P. M., Markey, C. N., Tinsley, B. J., & Ericsen, A. J. (2002). A preliminary validation of preadolescents’ self-reports using the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 173-181.
33.
Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (1991). Self-other agreement on multiple dimensions of preadolescent self-concept: Inferences by teachers, mothers, and fathers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 393-404.
34.
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., Terracciano, A., Parker, W. D., Mills, C. J., De Fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (2002). Personality trait development from age 12 to age 18: Longitudinal, cross-sectional, and cross-cultural analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1456-1468.
35.
Mervielde, I., Buyst, V., & De Fruyt, F. (1995). The validity of the Big Five as a model for teachers’ ratings of individual differences among children aged 4-12 years. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 525-534.
36.
Meyer, G. J. (1996). The Rorschach and MMPI: Toward a more scientifically differentiated understanding of cross-method assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 558-578.
37.
Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L. D., Kay, G. G., Moreland, K. L., Dies, R. R., Eisman, E. J., Kubiszyn, T. W., & Reed, G. M. (2001). Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist, 56, 128-165.
38.
Miller, S. A., & Davis, T. L. (1992). Beliefs about children: A comparative study of mothers, teachers, peers and self. Child Development, 63, 1251-1265.
39.
Mischel, W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 333-352). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
Musgrave-Marquart, D., Bromley, S. P., & Dalley, M. B. (1997). Personality, academic attribution, and substance use as predictors of academic achievement in college students. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 501-511.
41.
Paunonen, S. V. (1989). Consensus in personality judgments: Moderating effects of target-rater acquaintanceship and behavior observability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 823-833.
42.
Realo, A., Allik, J., Nõlvak, A., Valk, R., Ruus, T., Schmidt, M., & Eilola, T. (2003). Mind-reading ability: Beliefs and performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 420-445.
43.
Roberts, B. W., & DelVecchio, W. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3-25.
44.
Stanger, C., & Lewis, M. (1993). Agreement among parents, teachers, and children on internalizing and externalizing behavior problems. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 22, 107-115.
45.
ter Laak, J. J. F., DeGoede, M. P. M., & Brugman, G. M. (2001). Teacher’s judgements of pupils: Agreement and accuracy. Social Behavior and Personality, 29, 257-270.
46.
Watson, D. (1989). Stranger’s ratings of the five robust personality factors: Evidence of a surprising convergence with self-report. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 120-128.
47.
Wolfe, R. N., & Johnson, S. D. (1995). Personality as a predictor of college performance. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 55, 177-185.
48.
Youngstrom, E., Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2000). Patterns and correlates of agreement between parent, teacher, and male adolescent ratings of externalizing and internalizing problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 1038-1050.
