The current study tests the convergent and discriminant validity of a modified version of the Five Factor Model Rating Form (FFMRF), a one-page, brief measure of the five-factor model. The Five Factor Form (FFF) explicitly identifies maladaptive variants for both poles of each of the 30 facets of the FFMRF. The purpose of the current study was to test empirically whether this modified version still provides a valid assessment of the FFM, as well as to compare its validity as a measure of the FFM to other brief FFM measures. Two independent samples of 510 and 330 community adults were sampled, one third of whom had a history of some form of mental health treatment. The FFF was compared with three abbreviated and/or brief measures of the FFM (i.e., the FFMRF, the Ten Item Personality Inventory, and the Big Five Inventory), a more extended measure (i.e., International Personality Item Pool-NEO), an alternative measure of general personality (i.e., the HEXACO-Personality Inventory-Revised), and a measure of maladaptive personality functioning (i.e., the Personality Inventory for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition). The results of the current study demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity, even at the single-item facet level.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15, 327-353.
3.
AshtonM. C.LeeK.de VriesR. E.HendrickseJ.BornM. (2012). The maladaptive personality traits of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in relation to the HEXACO personality factors and schizotypy/dissociation. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 641-659.
4.
BrowneM. W. (2001). An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 111-150.
5.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3-5.
6.
CaspiA.RobertsB. W.ShinerR. L. (2005). Personality development: Stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453-484.
7.
ChmielewskiM.BagbyR. M.MarkonK. (in press). Openness to experience, intellect, schizotypal personality disorder, and psychoticism: Resolving the controversy. Journal of Personality Disorders.
8.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
9.
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
10.
CredeM.HarmsP.NiehorsterS.Gaye-ValentineA. (2012). An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 874-888.
11.
De ClercqB.De FruytF.Van LeeuwenK.MervieldeI. (2006). The structure of maladaptive personality traits in childhood: A first step toward an integrative developmental perspective for DSM-V. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 639-657.
12.
De PauwS. S.MervieldeI. (2010). Temperament, personality and developmental psychopathology: A review based on the conceptual dimensions underlying childhood traits. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 41, 313-329.
13.
De RaadB.PeruginiM. (Eds.). (2002). Big five assessment. Bern, Switzerland: Hogrefe & Huber.
14.
De YoungC. G. (2010). Personality neuroscience and the biology of traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 1165-1180.
15.
EhrhartM. G.EhrhartK.RoeschS. C.Chung-HerreraB. G.NadlerK.BradshawK. (2009). Testing the latent factor structure and construct validity of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 900-905.
16.
EndersC. K. (2006). A primer on the use of modern missing-data methods in psychosomatic medicine research. Psychosomatic Medicine, 68, 427-436.
17.
FollingstadD. R.RogersM. M.DuvallJ. (2012). Factors predicting relationship satisfaction, investment, and commitment when women report high prevalence of psychological abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 27, 257-273.
18.
GaughanE. T.MillerJ. D.LynamD. R. (2012). Examining the utility of general models of personality in the study of psychopathy: A comparison of the HEXACO PI-R and NEO PI-R. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 513-523.
19.
GloverN.CregoC.WidigerT. A. (2012). The clinical utility of the five-factor model of personality disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 176-184.
20.
GoldbergL. R.JohnsonJ. A.EberH. W.HoganR.AshtonM. C.CloningerC. R.GoughH. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84-96.
21.
GoreW. L.PresnallJ.LynamD. R.MillerJ. D.WidigerT. A. (2012). A five-factor measure of dependent personality traits. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 488-499.
22.
GoreW. L.WidigerT. A. (2013). The DSM-5 dimensional trait model and five factor models of general personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 816-821.
23.
GoslingS. D.RentfrowP. J.SwannW. B.Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528.
24.
HaiglerE. D.WidigerT. A. (2001). Experimental manipulation of NEO PI-R items. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, 339-358.
25.
HofmansJ.KuppensP.AllikJ. (2008). Is short in length short in content? An examination of the domain representation of the Ten Item Personality Inventory scales in Dutch language. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 750-755.
26.
HopwoodC. J.DonnellanM. B. (2010). How should the internal structure of personality inventories be evaluated?Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 332-346.
27.
HowellA. J.DopkoR. L.TurowskiJ. B.BuroK. (2011). The disposition to apologize. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 509-514.
28.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariate structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
29.
JohnO. P.NaumannL. P.SotoC. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. R.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 114-158). New York, NY: Guilford.
30.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. R.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 102-138). New York, NY: Guildford.
31.
KruegerR. F.DerringerJ.MarkonK. F.WatsonD.SkodolA. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879-1890.
32.
KruegerR. F.EatonN. R.ClarkL. A.WatsonD.MarkonK. E.DerringerJ.. . . LivesleyW. J. (2011). Deriving an empirical structure of personality pathology for DSM-5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 170-191.
33.
LaheyB. B. (2009). Public health significance of neuroticism. American Psychologist, 64, 241-256.
34.
LeeK.AshtonM. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO Personality Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329-358.
35.
LilienfeldS. O.WidowsM. R. (2005). Psychopathic Personality Inventory–Revised professional manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
36.
LivesleyW. J.JacksonD. N. (2002). Manual for the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology–Basic Questionnaire (DAPP-BQ). Port Huron, MI: Sigma Press.
37.
LoweJ. R.WidigerT. A. (2009). Clinicians’ judgments of clinical utility: A comparison of the DSM-IV with dimensional models of general personality. Journal of Personality Disorders, 23, 211-229.
38.
LynamD. R.WidigerT. A. (2001). Using the five-factor model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders: An expert consensus approach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 401-412.
39.
MarshH. W.LüdtkeO.MuthénB.AsparouhovT.MorinA. J. S.TrautweinU.NagengastB. (2010). A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471-491.
40.
MuckP. M.HellB.GoslingS. D. (2007). Construct validation of a short five-factor model instrument. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 166-175.
41.
Mullins-SweattS. N.JamersonJ. E.SamuelD. B.OlsonD. R.WidigerT. A. (2006). Psychometric properties of an abbreviated instrument of the Five-Factor Model. Assessment, 13, 119-137.
42.
Mullins-SweattS. N.WidigerT. A. (2011). Clinicians’ judgments of the utility of the DSM-IV and Five-Factor models for personality disordered patients. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 463-477.
43.
OzerD. J.Benet-MartinezV. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401-421.
44.
PaolacciG.ChandlerJ.IpeirotisP. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411-419.
45.
PiedmontR. L.ShermanM. F.ShermanN. C.Dy-LiaccoG. S.WilliamsJ. E. (2009). Using the five-factor model to identify a new personality disorder domain: The case for experiential permeability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1245-1258.
46.
ReynoldsS. K.ClarkL. A. (2001). Predicting dimensions of personality disorder from domains and facets of the Five-Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 69, 199-222.
47.
RobertsB. W.DelVecchioW. F. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3-25.
48.
RottmanB. M.AhnW. K.SanislowC. A.KimN. S. (2009). Can clinicians recognize DSM-IV personality disorders from five-factor model descriptions of patient cases?American Journal of Psychiatry, 196, 356-374.
49.
RottmanB. M.KimN. S.AhnW. K.SanislowC. A. (2011). Can personality disorder experts recognize DSM-IV personality disorders from five-factor model descriptions of patient cases?Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 72, 630-639.
50.
SamuelD. B.Mullins-SweattS. N.WidigerT. A. (2013). An investigation of the factor structure and convergent and discriminant validity of the Five Factor Model Rating Form. Assessment, 20, 24-35.
51.
SamuelD. B.WidigerT. A. (2004). Clinicians’ personality descriptions of prototypic personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18, 286-308.
52.
SamuelD. B.WidigerT. A. (2010). Comparing personality disorder models: Cross-method assessment of the FFM and DSM-IV-TR. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24, 721-745.
53.
SamuelD. B.WidigerT. A. (2011). Clinicians’ use of personality disorder models within a particular treatment setting: A longitudinal comparison of temporal consistency and clinical utility. Personality and Mental Health, 5, 12-28.
54.
SaucierG.GoldbergL. R. (2002). Assessing the Big Five: Applications of 10 psychometric criteria to the development of marker scales. In De RaadB.PeruginiM. (Eds.), Big Five assessment (pp. 29-58). Bern, Switzerland: Hogrefe & Huber.
55.
SchenkA. M.RagatzL. L.FremouwW. J. (2012). Vicious dogs part 2: Criminal thinking, callousness, and personality styles of their owners. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 57, 152-159.
56.
SchmittD. P.AllikJ.McCraeR. R.Benet-MartínezV. (2007). The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 173-212.
57.
SchuettlerD.BoalsA. (2011). The path to posttraumatic growth versus posttraumatic stress disorder: Contributions of even centrality and coping. Journal of Loss & Trauma, 16, 180-195.
58.
ShapiroD. N.ChandlerJ.MuellerP. A. (2013). Using Mechanical Turk to Study Clinical Populations. Clinical Psychological Science. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/2167702612469015
59.
SimmsL. J.GoldbergL. R.RobertsJ. E.WatsonD.WelteJ.RottermanJ. H. (2011). Computerized adaptive assessment of personality disorder: Introducing the CAT-PD project. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 380-389.
60.
SmithG. S.McCarthyD. M.AndersonK. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12, 102-111.
61.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P. (2009). Ten facet scales for the Big Five Inventory: Convergence with NEO PI-R facets, self-peer agreement, and discriminant validity. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(1), 84-90.
62.
SotoC. J.JohnO. P.GoslingS. D.PotterJ. (2008). The developmental psychometrics of Big Five self-reports: Acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 718-737.
63.
ThalmayerA. G.SaucierG.EigenhuisA. (2011). Comparative validity of brief to medium-length Big Five and Big Six personality questionnaires. Psychological Assessment, 23, 995-1009.
64.
ThomasK. M.YalchM. M.KruegerR. F.WrightA. G. C.MarkonK. E.HopwoodC. J. (2013). The convergent structure of DSM-5 personality trait facets and Five-Factor Model trait domains. Assessment, 20, 308-311.
65.
WidigerT. A.LynamD. R.MillerJ. D.OltmannsT. F. (2012). Measures to assess maladaptive variants of the five-factor model. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 450-455.
