The MMPI-2 Superlative (S) scale was developed by Butcher and Han (1995) to assess individuals’ tendencies to present themselves in an unrealistically positive light. The current study examined the performance of the L, K, and S scales in accurately distinguishing the MMPI-2 profiles of 379 psychiatric inpatients who produced one or more elevations on the basic scale profiles, from 82 psychiatric inpatients who produced no clinical range elevation on any of the eight basic clinical scales (excluding scales 5 and 0). The findings from the present study indicate that the S scale appears to be effective in the identification of defensiveness among psychiatric inpatients, with mean effect sizes in the moderate to large range. The optimal T-score cutoff for identifying defensive responders was 70 for both men and women. Further, results of hierarchical regression analyses showed that the S scale added incrementally to the prediction levels achieved by the optimal combination of the L and K scales.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental health disorders. Washington, DC: Author .
2.
Archer, R. P., Aiduk, R., Griffin, R., & Elkins, D. E. (1996). Incremental validity of the MMPI-2content scales in a psychiatric sample . Assessment, 3, 79-90 .
3.
Archer, R. P., Fontaine, J., & McCrae, R. R. (1998). Effects of two MMPI-2 validity scales on basic scale relations to external criteria . Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 87-102 .
4.
Archer, R. P., Griffin, R., & Aiduk, R. (1995). MMPI-2 clinical correlates for ten common codes . Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 391-407 .
5.
Archer, R. P., White, J. L., & Ovrin, G. H. (1979). MMPI characteristics and correlates among adolescent psychiatric inpatients . Journal of Clinical Psychology, 35, 498-504 .
6.
Baer, R. A., Wetter, M. W., Nichols, D. S., Greene, R., & Berry, D. T. R. (1995). Sensitivity of MMPI-2 validity scales to underreporting of symptoms . Psychological Assessment, 7, 419-423 .
7.
Bagby, R. M., Nicholson, R, A., Buis, T., Radovanovic, H. & Fidler, B. J. (1999). Defensive responding on the MMPI-2 in family custody and access evaluations . Psychological Assessment, 11, 24-28 .
8.
Bagby, R. M., Rogers, R., Nicholson, R. A., Buis, T., Seeman, M. V., & Rector, N. A. (1997). Effectiveness of the MMPI-2 validity indicators in the detection of defensive responding in clinical and nonclinical samples . Psychological Assessment, 9, 406-413 .
9.
Barthlow, D. L., Graham, J R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., & McNulty, J. L. (1999). Incremental validity of MMPI-2 content scales in an out-patient mental health setting . Psychological Assessment, 11, 39-47 .
10.
Ben-Porath, Y. S., Butcher, J. N., & Graham, J. R. (1991). Contributions of the MMPI-2 content scales to the differential diagnosis of schizophrenia and major depression . Psychological Assessment, 3, 634-640 .
11.
Ben-Porath, Y. S., McCully, E., & Almagor, M. (1993). Incremental validity of the MMPI-2 content scales in the assessment of personality and psychopathology by self-report . Journal of Personality Assessment, 61, 557-575 .
12.
Burish, T. G., & Houston, B. K. (1976). Construct validity of the lie scale as a measure of defensiveness . Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 310-313 .
13.
Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Kaemmer, B. (2001). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation (Rev. ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press .
14.
Butcher, J. N., & Han, K. (1995). Development of an MMPI-2 scale to assess the presentation of self in a superlative manner: The S scale. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 10, pp. 25-50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
15.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
16.
Dahlstrom, W. G., Welsh, G. S., & Dahlstrom, L. E. (1972). An MMPI handbook: Vol. I. Clinical interpretation (Rev. ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press .
17.
Derogatis, L. R. (1983). SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual-II. Towson, MD: Clinical Psychometric Research .
18.
Friedman, A. F., Lewak, R., Nichols, D. S., & Webb, J. T. (2001). Psychological assessment with the MMPI-2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
19.
Graham, J. R. (2000). MMPI-2: Assessing personality and psycho-pathology (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press .
20.
Greene, R. L. (2000). The MMPI: An interpretive manual (2nd. ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon .
21.
Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1940). A multiphasic personality schedule (Minnesota): I. Construction of the schedule . Journal of Psychology, 10, 249-254 .
22.
Lim, J., & Butcher, J. N. (1996). Detection of faking on the MMPI-2: Differentiation among faking-bad, denial, and claiming extreme virtue . Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 1-25 .
McKinley, J. C., Hathaway, S. R., & Meehl, P. E. (1948). The MMPI: VI. The K scale . Journal of Consulting Psychology, 12, 20-31 .
25.
Watkins, C. E., Campbell, V. L., Nieberding, R., & Hallmark, R. (1995). Contemporary practice of psychological assessment by clinical psychologists . Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 54-60 .
26.
Wiggins, J. S. (1959). Interrelationship among MMPI measures of dissimulation under standard and social desirability instructions . Journal of Consulting Psychology, 23, 419-427 .
