Item response theory (IRT) analyses have, over the past 3 decades, added much to our understanding of the relationships among and characteristics of test items, as revealed in examinees' response patterns. Assessment instruments used outside the educational context have only infrequently been analyzed using IRT, however. This study demonstrates the relevance of IRT to personality data through analyses of Scale 2 (the Depression Scale) on the revised Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2). A rich set of hypotheses regarding the items on this scale, including contrasts among the Harris-Lingoes and Wiener-Harmon subscales and differences in the items' measurement characteristics for men and women, are investigated through the IRT analyses.
Bejar, I. I.
(1980). A procedure for investigating the unidimensionality of achievement based on item parameter estimates.Journal of Educational Measurement, 17, 282-296.
2.
Birnbaum, A.
(1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick (Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp. 392-479). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
Block, J.
, Gjerde, P. F., & Block, J. H. (1991). Personality antecedents of depressive tendencies of 18-year-olds: A prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 726-738.
4.
Butcher, J. N.
, Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2: Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
5.
Childs, R. A.
, Dahlstrom, W. G., Kemp, S. M., & Panter, A. T. (1992). Item response theory in personality assessment: The MMPI-2 Depression scale (Research Rep. No. 92-1). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, L. L. Thurstone Psychometric Laboratory.
6.
Dahlstrom, W. G.
, Welsh, G. S., & Dahlstrom, L. E. (1972). An MMPI handbook: Vol. 1. Clinical interpretation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
7.
Ellis, B. B.
, & Kimmel, H. D. (1992). Identification of unique cultural response patterns by means of item response theory.Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 177-184.
8.
Gumbiner, J.
, & Flowers, J. (1997). Sex differences on the MMPI-1 and MMPI-2. Psychological Reports, 81, 479-482.
9.
Harris, R. E.
, & Lingoes, J. C. (1955). Subscales for the MMPI: An aid to profile interpretation. Mimeographed materials, Department of Psychiatry, University of California at San Francisco.
10.
Hathaway, S. R.
, & McKinley, J. C. (1942). A multiphasic personality schedule (Minnesota): III. The measurement of symptomatic depression.Journal of Psychology, 14, 73-84.
11.
Hovanitz, C. A.
, & Jordan-Brown, L. (1986). The validity of MMPI subtle and obvious items in psychiatric patients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 42, 100-108.
12.
Hulin, C. L.
, Drasgow, F., & Komocar, J. (1982). Applications of item response theory to analysis of attitude scale translations.Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 818-825.
13.
Jackson, D. N.
(1971). The dynamics of structured personality tests: 1971. Psychological Review, 78, 229-248.
14.
Kemp, S. M.
(1993, August). Analyzing the individual characteristics of subtle and obvious MMPI items. In R. L. Green (Chair), Item response theory applications in personality assessment. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
15.
Lord, F. M.
, & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16.
Mislevy, R.
(1986). Recent developments in the factor analysis of categorical data. Journal of Educational Statistics, 11, 3-31.
17.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S.
(1987). Sex differences in unipolar depression: Evidence and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 259-282.
18.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S.
(1991). Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 569-582.
19.
Panter, A. T.
, Swygert, K. A., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Tanaka, J. S. (1997). Factor analytic approaches to personality item-level data. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 561-589.
20.
Paulhus, D. L.
(1989). Socially desirable responding: Some new solutions to old problems. In D. M. Buss & N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 201-209). New York: Springer-Verlag.
21.
Reckase, M. D.
(1997). The past and future of multidimensional item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 25-36.
22.
Reise, S. P.
(1999). Personality measurement issues viewed through the eyes of IRT. In S. E. Embretson & S. L. Hershberger (Eds.), The new rules of measurement (pp. 219-241). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
Reise, S. P.
, & Waller, N. G. (1990). Fitting the twoparameter model to personality data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 45-58.
24.
Reiser, M.
(1981). Latent trait modeling of attitude items. In G. W. Bohrnstedt & E. F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues (pp. 117-144). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25.
Schaeffer, N. C.
(1988). An application of item response theory to the measurement of depression. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 271-307). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
26.
Schwarz, N.
(1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. T. Higgins & R. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 527-561). New York: Guilford.
27.
Sireci, S. G.
(1997). Dimensionality issues related to the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Commissioned paper for the National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council's Committee on the Evaluation of National and State Assessments of Educational Progress.
28.
Steinberg, L.
, & Thissen, D. (1995). Item response theory in personality research. In P. E. Shrout & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Personality research, methods, and theory: A festschrift honoring Donald W. Fiske (pp. 161-181). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29.
Stout, W.
(1987). A nonparametric approach for assessing latent trait unidimensionality. Psychometrika, 52, 589-617.
30.
Thissen, D.
(1991). MULTILOG user's guide: Multiple, categorical item analysis and test scoring using item response theory (Version 6.0). Chicago: Scientific Software.
31.
Thissen, D.
, Steinberg, L., & Gerrard, M. (1986). Beyond group-mean differences: The concept of item bias. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 118-128.
32.
Waller, N. G.
, & Reise, S. P. (1989). Computerized adaptive personality assessment: An illustration with the Absorption Scale.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1051-1058.
33.
Wiener, D. N.
, & Harmon, L. R. (1946). Subtle and obvious keys for the MMPI: Their development (Advisement Bulletin No. 16). Minneapolis, MN: Regional Veterans Administrative Office.
34.
Zalewski, C.
, Schatz, C. T., Gottesman, I. I., & Nichols, D. S. (1997). Discriminant validity of the MMPI Depression Subtle (D-S) and Depression Obvious (D-O) scales. Assessment, 4, 311-319.
