The purpose of this empirical study was to examine the interface between two key models of communication style: social style and communicator style. Social style is based on a two-by-two matrix composed of two dimensions of observable patterns of behavior: assertiveness and emotiveness. Communicator style was established in the communication discipline and involves nine factors and one global assessment of communicator image. The current study measured self-assessments of social style and communicator style by 852 individuals to test the theoretical interface of the models. Factor analysis confirmed the social style dimensions and some of the communicator style dimensions. The resulting components were factored, resulting in four dimensions of transactional style: emotive, assertive, relaxed, and accurate. Regression results indicate three of the dimensions are predictive of communicator self-image and explain nearly 36% of the variance.
Andersen, J.F., Norton, R.W., & Nussbaum, J.F. (1981). Three investigations exploring relationships between perceived teacher communication behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 30, 377-392.
2.
Bacon, C.C., & Severson, M.L. (1986). Assertiveness, responsiveness, and versatility as predictors of leadership emergence. Communication Research Reports,3, 53-59.
3.
Baker, D.D., & Ganster, D.C. (1985). Leader communication style: A test of average versus vertical dyad linkage models. Group and Organization Studies, 10(3), 242-259.
4.
Bales, R.F., & Cohen, S.P. (1979). SYMLOG: A system for the multiple level observation of groups. New York: Free Press .
5.
Bednar, D.A. (1982). Relationships between communicator style and managerial performance in complex organizations: A field study. Journal of Business Communication, 19(4), 51-76.
6.
Blake, R.R., & Mouton, J.S. (1974). Building a dynamic corporation through grid organization development. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
7.
Borgatta, E.F., Cottrell, L.S., & Mann, J.H. (1958). The spectrum of individual interaction characteristics: An interdimensional analysis. Psychological Reports, 4, 279-319.
8.
Buchholz, S.W. (1976). The effects of training in managing interpersonal relationships on the perceptions of social style: An empirical study. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska, Lincoln. (UMI No. 7714635)
9.
Buchholz, S.W., Lashbrook, W.B., & Wenburg, J.R. (1976). Toward the measurement and processing of social style. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Portland, OR.
10.
Duran, R.L., & Zakahi, W.R. (1987). Communication performance and communication satisfaction: What do we teach our students?Communication Education, 36, 13-22.
11.
Fiedler, F.E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
Giffin, K. (1967). The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication process. Psychological Bulletin,68, 102-120.
13.
Honeycutt, J.M., & Worobey, J.L. (1987). Impressions about communication styles and competence in nursing relationships. Communication Education, 36(1), 217-227.
14.
House, R.J., & Mitchell, T.R. (1974). Path-goal theory of leadership . Journal of Contemporary Business, 3, 81-98.
15.
Infante, D.A., Anderson, C.M., Martin, M.M., Herington, A.D., & Kim, J. (1993). Subordinates' satisfaction and perceptions of superiors' compliance-gaining tactics, argumentativeness, verbal aggressiveness, and style. Management Communication Quarterly,6, 307-326.
16.
Infante, D.A., & Gorden, W.I. (1989). Argumentativeness and affirming communicator style as predictors of satisfaction/dissatisfaction with subordinates. Communication Quarterly, 37, 81-90.
17.
Infante, D.A., Rancer, A.S. & Jordan, F.F. (1996). Affirming and nonaffirming style, dyad sex, and the perception of argumentation and verbal aggression in an interpersonal dispute. Human Communication Research, 22(3), 315-334.
18.
Inglis, M. (1993). The communicator style measure applied to nonnative speaking teaching assistants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 17, 89-105.
19.
Kearney, P. (1984). Perceptual discrepancies in teacher communication style. Communication, 13(1), 95-108.
20.
Knutson, P.K., & Lashbrook, W.B. (1976). Communication apprehension as an antecedent to social style. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Francisco.
21.
Lashbrook, V.J., & Lashbrook, W.B. (1980). Social style as a basis for adult training. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Central States Speech Association, Chicago .
22.
Lashbrook, W.B., Knutson, P.K., Parsely, M.L., & Wenburg, J.R. (1976). An empirical examination of versatility as a consequence of perceived social style. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Speech Communication Association, San Francisco.
23.
Lashbrook, W.B., & Lashbrook, V.J. (1979). The statistical adequacy of the social style profile. Eden Prairie, MN: WilsonLearning.
24.
Lashbrook, W.B., Lashbrook, V.J., Parsely, M.L., & Wenburg, J.R. (1977). A study of the relationship between social style and measures of perceived versatility and interpersonal trust. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Berlin.
25.
Levy, J., Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., & Morganfield, B. (1997). Language and cultural factors in students' perceptions of teacher communication style. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 21(1), 29-56.
26.
May, G.L., & Gueldenzoph, L.E. (2006). The impact of social style on student peer evaluation ratings in group projects. Journal of Business Communication, 43(1), 4-20.
27.
Merrill, D. (1981). Personal styles and effective performance: Make your style work for you. Radnor, PA: Chilton.
28.
Merrill, D., & Reid, R. (1981). Personal styles and effective performance. Radnor, PA: Chilton.
29.
Norton, R. (1977). Teacher effectiveness as a function of communicator style. In B. Ruben (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 1 (pp. 525-542). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
30.
Norton, R. (1978). Foundation of a communicator style construct. Human Communication Research, 4, 99-112.
31.
Norton, R. (1983). Communicator style: Theory, applications, and measures. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
32.
Norton, R., & Nussbaum, J. (1980). Dramatic behaviors of the effective teacher. In B. Ruben (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 4 (pp. 565-582). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
33.
Nunnally, J.C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York : McGraw-Hill.
34.
Prince, G.L. (1986). Staff development for improving administrators' social style. Journal of Staff Development, 71, 66-72.
35.
Prince, G.L. (1991). Style and versatility: The unique factors. Educational Considerations, 18(2), 7-10.
36.
Prisbell, M. (1994). Students' perceptions of instructors' style of communication and satisfaction with communication in the classroom. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 1398.
37.
Sallinen-Kuparinen, A. (1992). Teacher communicator style. Communication Education, 41, 153-166.
38.
Sallinen-Kuparinen, A., Marttinen, P., Peramaki, P., & Porhola, M. (1987). Teacher effectiveness and communicator style. In A. Sallinen-Kuparinen (Ed.), Perspectives on instructional communication (pp. 97-111). Jyvaskyla , Finland: University of Jyvaskyla.
39.
Schereer, K., London, H., & Wolf, J. (1973). The voice of confidence: Paralinguistic cues and audience evaluation, Journal of Research in Personality, 7, 31-44.
40.
Snavely, W.B. (1981). The impact of social style upon person perception in primary relationships. Communication Quarterly, 29, 132-143.
41.
Snavely, W.B. (1992). The measurement and evaluation of social style . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Las Vegas, NV.
42.
Snavely, W.B. (1997). Human communication in organizations. In F. Luthans (Ed.), Virtual OB . New York: McGraw-Hill.
43.
Snavely, W.B., & Walters, E.V. (1983). Differences in communication competence among administrative social styles. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 11(2), 120-135.
44.
Sorenson, R.L., & Savage, G.T. (1989). Signaling participation through relational communication: A test of the leader interpersonal influence model. Group and Organization Studies, 14(3), 325-354.
45.
Sullivan, D.L. (1977). Explorations in stylistic interpersonal communication: A conceptual framework and an empirical strategy. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska, Lincoln. (UMI No. 7723162)
46.
Thompson, C.A., & Klopf, D.W. (1995). Social style among North American, Finnish, Japanese and Korean university students. Psychological Reports, 77, 60-62.
47.
Wenschlag, R. (1987). The versatile salesperson. New York: John Wiley.
