Previous research leaves open which facets of leadership foster the implementation of process innovations. In this study, the authors analyze the effects of delegative-participative and consultative-advisory leadership, respectively, on the implementation success of process innovations. They argue that each of these leadership behaviors entails specific advantages and risks and that therefore the two patterns complement each other. The sample consisted of managers from different organizations. Although the posited main effects of both delegative-participative and consultative-advisory leadership are confirmed, the significant interaction between these two leadership styles has a different direction than the authors hypothesized.
Amabile, T.M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity . Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154-1184.
2.
Anderson, N.R., & King, N. (1993). Innovations in organizations. In C. I. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 1-33). Chichester , UK: Wiley.
3.
Atuahene-Gima, K. (2003). The effects of centrifugal and centripetal forces on product development speed and quality: How does problem solving matter ? Academy of Management Journal, 46, 359-373.
4.
Axtell, C.M., Holman, D.J., Unsworth, K.L., Wall, T.D., Waterson, P.E., & Harrington, E. (2000). Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestion and implementation of ideas. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 265-285.
5.
Bauer, T.N., & Green, S.G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1538-1567.
6.
Brehm, J.W. (1966). Theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.
7.
Brockner, J., & Siegel, P.A. (1996). Understanding the interaction between procedural and distributive justice. The role of trust. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 390-413). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Burpitt, W.J., & Bigoness, W.J. (1997). Leadership and innovation among teams. The impact of empowerment. Small Group Research , 28, 414-423.
9.
De Dreu, C.K.W. (2006). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. Journal of Management, 32, 83-107.
10.
Flanagan, J.C. (1954). The critical incidents technique. Psychological Bulletin,51, 327-358.
11.
Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1994). Action as the core of work psychology: A German approach. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 271-340). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
12.
Gebert, D., Boerner, S., & Kearney, E. (2006). Cross-functionality and innovation in new product development teams: A dilemmatic structure and its consequences for the management of diversity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15, 431-458.
13.
Jehn, K. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282.
14.
Krause, D.E. (2004). Influenced-based leadership as a determinant of the inclination to innovate and of innovation-related behaviors—An empirical investigation. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 79-102.
15.
Krause, D.E., & Kearney, K. (2006). The use of power in different contexts: Arguments for a context specific perspective. In C. A. Schriesheim & L. L. Neider (Eds.), Power and influence in organizations. New empirical and theoretical perspectives. Research in management: Vol. 5 (pp. 59-86). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
16.
Lazarus, R.S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Lewis, L.K., & Seibold, D.R. (1993). Innovation modification during intraorganizational adoption. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 322-354.
18.
Manz, C.C., Bastien D.T., Hostager, T.J., & Shapiro, G.L. (1989). Leadership and innovation: A longitudinal process view. In A. H. Van de Ven, H. L. Angle, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Research on the management of innovation: The Minnesota studies (pp. 613-636). New York: Harper & Row.
Oldham, G.R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607-634.
21.
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies . Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
22.
Quinn, R. E., & Cameron, K. S. (Eds.) (1988). Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organizations and management. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
23.
Scott, S.G., & Bruce, R.A. (1998). Following the leader in R&D: The joint effect of subordinate problem-solving style and leader-member relations on innovative behavior. IEEE Transactions on EngineeringManagement, 45, 3-10.
24.
Sheremata, W. (2000). Centrifugal and centripetal forces in radical new product development under time pressure. Academy of Management Review, 25, 398-408.
25.
Spector, P.E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research. Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Method, 9, 221-232.
26.
Tierney, P., Farmer, S.M., & Graen, G.B. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology , 52, 591-618.
27.
Tyler, T.R., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913-930.
28.
West, M. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation within groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 355-386.
29.
Yukl, G. (2006). Leadership in organizations (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
