As advanced reactors near deployment, there is an economically driven need to consider greater levels of automation as part of the concept of operations. Recent efforts to modernize control rooms have shifted from analog to digital concepts of operations, but there is still a need for additional fundamental human factors research to establish optimal levels of automation. This paper presents a novel automation testbed comprised of a simplified reactor simulator (Rancor Microworld Simulator), a computer-based procedure system (Rancor Integrated Procedure System), and a virtual operator framework (Human Unimodel for Nuclear Technology to Enhance Reliability). By systematically varying the activities of the virtual operator acting as the automation system, it is possible to create operating scenarios that fall into distinct levels of automation. Such a testbed is necessary to accelerate the successful deployment of automated concepts of operations for future nuclear power plants.
AlbertiA. L.AgarwalV.GutowskaI.PalmerC. J.de OliveiraC. R. E. (2023). Automation levels for nuclear reactor operations: A revised perspective. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 157, 104559.
2.
AlivisatosC. (2023). Evaluating remote operations for advanced nuclear reactor control: Feasibility, benefits, and implementation criteria (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.
3.
American National Standards Institute/American Nuclear Society. (2024). Nuclear power plant simulators for use in operator training and examination, ANSI/ANS-3.5-2018 (R2024). American National Standards Institute.
4.
BoringR. (2023). Human factors for advanced reactors. AHFE Open Access, 94, 156–165.
5.
BoringR. (2024). Early demonstration of human factors concepts of operations for advanced reactors. Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, 131(1), 372–375.
6.
BoringR. L. (2020). The first decade of the Human Systems Simulation Laboratory: A brief history of human factors research in support of nuclear power plants. Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Software and Systems Engineering, 1213, 528–535.
7.
BoringR. L.RasmussenM. (2016). GOMS-HRA: A method for treating subtasks in dynamic human reliability analysis. In Risk, reliability and safety: Innovating theory and practice, Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Conference (pp. 956–963). CRC Press.
8.
BoringR. L.LewR.UlrichT. A. (2025). Rancor Integrated Procedure System (RIPS): A computer-based procedure platform for advanced reactor research. In Proceedings of the 14th Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control and Human-Machine Interface Technologies (pp. 199–208). American Nuclear Society.
9.
BoringR. L.UlrichT. A.LewR. (2023). The next-generation control room: Using the Rancor microworld simulator to modernize digital control rooms. In Proceedings of the 13th Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control and Human-Machine Interface Technologies (pp. 677–684). American Nuclear Society.
10.
BoringR. L.UlrichT. A.LewR. (2023). Levels of digitization, digitalization, and automation for advanced reactors. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 67, 207–213.
11.
BoringR.UlrichT.LewR.HallA.ParkJ. (2023a). Preliminary empirical findings on dependency from a simulator study. In Proceedings of the 13th Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control and Human-Machine Interface Technologies (pp. 195–204). American Nuclear Society.
12.
BoringR.UlrichT.LewR.ParkJ. (2023b). HUNTER Procedure Performance Predictor: Supporting new procedure development with a dynamic human reliability analysis method. AHFE Open Access, 117, 29–38.
13.
BoringR. L.UlrichT. A.LewR.ParkJ. (2025a). Rancor-HUNTER: Using a simulator engine for realistic human performance modeling of nuclear power operations. In Proceedings of the Probabilistic Safety Assessment Conference (pp. 8–17). American Nuclear Society.
14.
BoringR. L.UlrichT. A.LewR.ParkJ. (2025b). Virtual human in the loop (VHITL): Generating synthetic human performance data with HUNTER. AHFE Open Access, 173, 1–11.
15.
HallA.AlivisatosC.UlrichT. A.LewR.BoringR. L.PoreskyC. (2023). Visual style elements in human-system interface design for nuclear power operations: Does style affect performance and preference?Human Factors. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208231209148
16.
IEEE Standards Association. (2022). IEEE guide for human factors applications of computerized operating procedure systems (COPS) at nuclear power generating stations and other nuclear facilities, IEEE-Std-1786. IEEE Standards Association.
17.
ParkJ.BoringR. L.UlrichT. A.LewR.LeeS.ParkB.KimJ. (2022). A framework to collect human reliability analysis data for nuclear power plants using a simplified simulator and student operators. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 221, 108326.
18.
UlrichT. A.LewR.WernerS.BoringR. L. (2017). Rancor: A gamified microworld nuclear power plant simulation for engineering psychology research and process control applications. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 61, 398–402.
19.
United States Federal Government. (2007). Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10 – Energy, Chapter I – Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Part 55 – Operators’ licenses, 10 CFR 55. U.S. Government Printing Office.
