As autonomous vehicles (AVs) advance, understanding driver visual attention and trust in various driving modes is crucial for ensuring safety and effective design. This study examined the relationship between trust and visual attention in a simulated Level 3 driving environment, utilizing eye-tracking metrics: fixation duration (FD), fixation count (FC), and time to first fixation (TFF). Thirty-four participants navigated scenarios involving automation, handover, manual, and takeover modes while interacting with a human-machine interface. Results from generalized linear mixed models and multivariate regression revealed that higher trust significantly influenced attention allocation, particularly in automation and handover modes. Trust was associated with increased FD and FC on in-vehicle displays and decreased TFF, especially for tablet-related areas of interest. These findings highlight the nonlinearity of trust in modulating visual engagement, suggesting that overly high trust may lead to reduced attention to monitoring-critical interfaces.
BanksV. A.PlantK. L.StantonN. A. (2018). Driver error or designer error: Using the Perceptual Cycle Model to explore the circumstances surrounding the fatal Tesla crash on 7th May 2016. Safety Science, 108, 278–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.023
2.
BrightA. B.CotterJ. E.TenhundfeldN. L. (2023). Degradations of trust in automation associated with repeated monitoring checks. In 2023 systems and information engineering design symposium (SIEDS) (pp. 171–176). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS58326.2023.10137809
3.
BrownR. D.GalsterS. M. (2004). Effects of reliable and unreliable automation on subjective measures of mental workload, situation awareness, trust and confidence in a dynamic flight task. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 48(1), 147–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120404800132
4.
ClementsL. M.KockelmanK. M. (2017). Economic Effects of Automated Vehicles. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2606(1), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.3141/2606-14
5.
De VisserE. J.PhillipsE.TenhundfeldN.DonadioB.BarentineC.KimB.MadisonA.RiesA.TossellC. C. (2023). Trust in automated parking systems: A mixed methods evaluation. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 96, 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2023.05.018
6.
GasparJ.CarneyC. (2019). The effect of partial automation on driver attention: A naturalistic driving study. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 61(8), 1261–1276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819836310
7.
HergethS.LorenzL.VilimekR.KremsJ. F. (2016). Keep your scanners peeled: gaze behavior as a measure of automation trust during highly automated driving. Human Factors, 58(3), 509–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815625744
8.
HuffE. W.DellaMariaN.PosadasB.BrinkleyJ. (2019). Am I Too Old to Drive?: Opinions of older adults on self-driving vehicles. In The 21st international ACM SIGACCESS conference on computers and accessibility (pp. 500–509). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3353801
9.
LiangN.YangJ.YuD.Prakah-AsanteK. O.CurryR.BlommerM.SwaminathanR.PittsB. J. (2021). Using eye-tracking to investigate the effects of pre-takeover visual engagement on situation awareness during automated driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 157, 106143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106143
10.
LlanerasR. E.SalingerJ.GreenC. A. (2013). Human factors issues associated with limited ability autonomous driving systems: Drivers’ allocation of visual attention to the forward roadway. In Proceedings of the 7th international driving symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training, and vehicle design : Driving assessment 2013 (pp. 92–98). Public Policy Center. https://doi.org/10.17077/drivingassessment.1472
11.
MaY.QiS.ZhangY.LianG.LuW.ChanC.-Y. (2020). Drivers’ visual attention characteristics under different cognitive workloads: An on-road driving behavior study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), 5366. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155366
12.
McMainsS. A.KastnerS. (2009). Visual attention. In BinderM. D.HirokawaN.WindhorstU. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of neuroscience (pp. 4296–4302). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-29678-2_6344
13.
MeyerD.DimitriadouE.HornikK.WeingesselA.LeischF. (1999). e1071: Misc functions of the department of statistics, probability theory group (Formerly: E1071), TU Wien (p. 1.7-16) [Dataset]. https://doi.org/10.32614/CRAN.package.e1071
14.
PipkornL.DozzaM.TivestenE. (2024). Driver visual attention before and after take-over requests during automated driving on public roads. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 66(2), 336–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208221093863
TabachnickL. S.FidellB. G. (2006). Using Multivariate Statistics. Allyn & Bacon.
19.
TenhundfeldN.DemirM.de VisserE. (2022). Assessment of trust in automation in the “real world”: Requirements for new trust in automation measurement techniques for use by practitioners. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 16(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/15553434221096261
20.
TenhundfeldN. L.de VisserE. J.HaringK. S.RiesA. J.FinomoreV. S.TossellC. C. (2019). Calibrating trust in automation through familiarity with the autoparking feature of a tesla model X. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 13(4), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343419869083
21.
TivestenE.VictorT.MorandoA. (2015, November9). The timecourse of driver visual attention in naturalistic driving with adaptive cruise control and forward collision warning. In 4th international driver distraction and inattention conference, Sydney, New South Wales.
