Neurofeedback Training for Cognitive Optimization: Effects on Performance and Workload in a Simulation Task

Abstract

Neurofeedback (NF) training allows individuals to learn to control brain activity with the aid of real-time electroencephalography (EEG) feedback, with possible applications in attention and cognitive control. Although its influences have been confirmed in lab tests, NF’s use in active, high-pressure situations has yet to be studied. This study examined NF’s effect on cognitive performance and workload in a simulated “search and shoot” task. Forty individuals were randomly assigned to an NF or control group. Both underwent three sessions, but only the NF group received real-time EEG-based visual feedback on their focus. Pre- and post-training measures included enemies neutralized, shots fired, survival time, and subjective workload (NASA-TLX). The NF group showed significantly better performance and a greater reduction in perceived workload. While both groups improved with time, only the NF group showed consistent gains. These findings support NF’s feasibility for simulation-based training. Future work should explore long-term and real-world applications.

Keywords

Neurofeedback EEG cognitive performance simulation training mental workload human factors

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baumeister

R. F.

Vohs

K. D.

Tice

D. M.

(2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00534.x

Carver

C. S.

Scheier

M. F.

(1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge University Press.

Enriquez-Geppert

Huster

R. J.

Herrmann

C. S.

(2019). EEG-neurofeedback as a tool to modulate cognition and behavior: A review tutorial. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 51. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00051

Gruzelier

J. H.

(2014). EEG-neurofeedback for optimising performance. I: A review of cognitive and affective outcome in healthy participants. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 44, 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.09.015

Hammond

D. C.

(2005). Neurofeedback treatment of depression and anxiety. Journal of Adult Development, 12(2–3), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-005-7029-5

Hancock

P. A.

Warm

J. S.

(1989). A dynamic model of stress and sustained attention. Human Factors, 31(5), 519–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088903100503

Hockey

G. R.

(1997). Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical framework. Biological Psychology, 45(1–3), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0511(96)05223-4

Matsuzaki

Nomura

Sato

Tanaka

(2023). Neurofeedback combined with cognitive training: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 48(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-022-09559-w

Mazur

L. M.

Mosaly

P. R.

Thomas

Nuamah

Adapa

Marks

L. B.

(2021). Effect of simulation-based training and neurofeedback interventions on radiation technologists’ workload, situation awareness, and performance. Journal of Radiological Protection, 41(3), 458–472. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ac126c

10.

Parasuraman

(2003). Neuroergonomics: A new brain science of human factors. Human Factors, 45(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.45.1.27.27211

11.

Putman

van Peer

Maimari

van der Werff

(2010). EEG theta/beta ratio in relation to fear-modulated response-inhibition, attentional control, and affective traits. Biological Psychology, 83(2), 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.10.008

12.

Thibault

R. T.

Lifshitz

Raz

(2016). The self-regulating brain and neurofeedback: Experimental science and clinical promise. Cortex, 74, 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.10.024

13.

Vernon

Egner

Cooper

Compton

Neilands

Sheri

Gruzelier

(2003). The effect of training distinct neurofeedback protocols on aspects of cognitive performance. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 47(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(02)00091-0

14.

Warm

J. S.

Parasuraman

Matthews

(2008). Vigilance requires hard mental work and is stressful. Human Factors, 50(3), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X312152

15.

Wickens

C. D.

Hollands

J. G.

Banbury

Parasuraman

(Eds.). (2004). Engineering psychology and human performance (3rd ed.). Pearson.