Method for Designing Operational Management Concepts for Low-Crewed Surface Vessels

Abstract

In this work, we outline and appraise a method for creating and evaluating an Operational Management Concept (OMC) for Low- Crewed Surface Vessels (LSVs) in the Royal Netherlands Navy (RNLN). Utilizing Cognitive Work Analysis (CWA) and Design Thinking tools, three workshops were carried out with seven Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) focused on task allocation and the feasibility of minimal crewing. The first two workshops developed a task allocation concept, considering human responsibility, automation, and shore support. The third workshop utilized a tabletop game to evaluate the OMC’s feasibility and to enrich the OMC with more detail. The workshops led to an innovative OMC with roughly a dozen crew members, heavily dependent on automation, redundant systems, and shore support. The workshops allowed SMEs to expand their current experiences and encouraged discussions on human responsibility, collaboration, and technological support. The workshops underscored the need for deeper immersion (e.g., by using Virtual Reality) to effectively assess advanced automated systems.

Keywords

operational management navy cognitive work analysis design thinking concept development task allocation crew design

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Boeing

A. A.

Jorritsma

Griffin

M. A.

Parker

S. K.

(2020). Surfacing the social factors early: A sociotechnical approach to the design of a future submarine. Australian Journal of Management, 45(3), 527–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896220920338

IDEO. (n.d.). Design thinking. IDEO U. Retrieved February 7, 2025, from https://www.ideou.com/pages/design-thinking

Johnson

Bradshaw

J. M.

Feltovich

P. J.

Jonker

C. M.

Van Riemsdijk

M. B.

Sierhuis

(2014). Coactive design: Designing support for interdependence in joint activity. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, 3(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.5898/jhri.3.1.johnson

Miller

M. J.

Feigh

K. M.

(2019). Addressing the envisioned world problem: a case study in human spaceflight operations. Design Science, 5. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2019.2

Naikar

Pearce

Drumm

Sanderson

P. M.

(2003). Designing teams for First-of-a-Kind, complex systems using the initial phases of cognitive work analysis: case study. Human Factors, 45(2), 202–217. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.45.2.202.27236

Potter

S. S.

Roth

E. M.

Woods

D. D.

Elm

W. C.

(2000). Bootstrapping multiple converging cognitive task analysis techniques for system design. In Schraagen

J.M.

Chipman

S.F.

Shalin

V. L.

(Eds.), Cognitive task analysis (pp. 317–340). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Proud

R. W.

Hart

J. J.

Mrozinski

R. B.

(2003). Methods for determining the level of autonomy to design into a human spaceflight vehicle: a function specific approach. NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS). https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20100017272

Royal Netherlands Navy (RNLN) (2023). Sail plan vooruit! [Sail plan ahead!] https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/brochures/2023/05/17/brochure-sail-plan

Strain

Eason

(2000). Exploring the implications of allocation of function for human resource management in the Royal Navy. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 52(2), 319–334.

10.

U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2024). Actions needed to improve support for sailor-led maintenance. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-24-106525

11.

Vicente

K. J.

(1999). Cognitive work analysis: Toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

12.

Woods

Dekker

(2000). Anticipating the effects of technological change: A new era of dynamics for human factors. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 1(3), 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220110037452