Debugging process plays a crucial role in helping students pinpoint their specific learning weaknesses, allowing them to modify their strategies for enhanced academic performance. Notably, changes in pupil dilation serve as an indicator of arousal associated with confronting learning challenges. This physiological response acts as a “physiological footprint” that reflects cognitive engagement, facilitating internally focused cognitive processes such as insight generation and mind-wandering. In this study, we proposed that pupil dilation could be a valuable predictor of students’ metacognitive awareness throughout the debugging process, specifically within an augmented reality (AR) learning environment. The findings revealed significant differences in pupil dilation among students categorized by their varying levels of debugging, which represents a specific dimension of the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory.
AndersonJ. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89(4), 369.
2.
ArielR.CastelA. D. (2014). Eyes wide open: Enhanced pupil dilation when selectively studying important information. Experimental Brain Research, 232(1), 337–344.
3.
BaddeleyA. (2010). Working memory. Current Biology, 20(4), R136–R140.
4.
BouretS.SaraS. J. (2005). Network reset: a simplified overarching theory of locus coeruleus noradrenaline function. Trends in Neurosciences, 28(11), 574–582.
5.
ÇekenB.TaşkınN. (2022). Multimedia learning principles in different learning environments: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 19.
ChiM. T.BassokM.LewisM. W.ReimannP.GlaserR. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13(2), 145–182.
8.
ChiuC.-K.ChuangJ.-H.PaganoC. C.BabuS. V. (2024, October). Investigating the carryover effects of calibration of size perception in augmented reality to the real world. In EckU.SraM.StefanucciJ.SugimotoM.TatzgernM.WilliamsI. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR 2024) (pp. 806–815). IEEE Computer Society.
9.
D’MelloS.LehmanB.PekrunR.GraesserA. (2014). Confusion can be beneficial for learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 153–170.
10.
FlavellJ. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906.
11.
FranklinM. S.BroadwayJ. M.MrazekM. D.SmallwoodJ.SchoolerJ. W. (2013). Window to the wandering mind: Pupillometry of spontaneous thought while reading. SAGE Publications.
12.
GuoW.KimJ. H. (2021). Designing augmented reality learning systems with real-time tracking sensors. In Advances in neuroergonomics and cognitive engineering: Proceedings of the AHFE 2021 virtual conferences on neuroergonomics and cognitive engineering, industrial cognitive ergonomics and engineering psychology, and cognitive computing and internet of things, July 25–29, 2021, USA (Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Vol. 269–276). Springer International Publishing.
13.
JärveläS.JärvenojaH.MalmbergJ. (2019). Capturing the dynamic and cyclical nature of regulation: Methodological progress in understanding socially shared regulation in learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 14, 425–441.
14.
KahnemanD.BeattyJ. (1966). Pupil diameter and load on memory. Science, 154(3756), 1583–1585.
15.
KimJ. H.MonhantyS.PulipatiV.WangF.MostowfiS.OpreanD.WangY.SeoK. (2024). Assessing student performance through pupil dilation and problem-solving time in augmented reality. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (Vol. 1, pp. 589–595). . SAGE Publications.
16.
KimJ. H.YangX. (2020). Measuring driver’s perceived workload using fractal dimension of pupil dilation. In Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (Vol. 64, pp. 1620–1624). SAGE Publications.
17.
MagnoC. (2010). A measure for scientific thinking. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 6(1), 71–86.
18.
MetcalfeJ. (2009). Metacognitive judgments and control of study. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 159–163.
19.
MohantyS.KimJ. H.PulipatiV.WangF.MostowfiS.OpreanD.WangY.SeoK. (2024). Measuring cognitive workload in augmented reality learning environments through pupil area analysis. In International Conference on human–computer interaction (Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 13415, pp. 167–181). Springer Nature Switzerland.
20.
NelsonT. O. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In BowerG. H. (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 125–173). Elsevier.
21.
PapeshM. H.GoldingerS. D.HoutM. C. (2012). Memory strength and specificity revealed by pupillometry. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(1), 56–64.
22.
Pijeira-DíazH. J.DrachslerH.KirschnerP. A.JärveläS. (2018). Profiling sympathetic arousal in a physics course: How active are students?Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(4), 397–408.
23.
RobisonM. K.BrewerG. A. (2022). Individual differences in working memory capacity, attention control, fluid intelligence, and pupillary measures of arousal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 48(9), 1296.
SeufertT. (2018). The interplay between self-regulation in learning and cognitive load. Educational Research Review, 24, 116–129.
27.
SwellerJ. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.
28.
Van GogT.PaasF.SwellerJ. (2010). Cognitive load theory: Advances in research on worked examples, animations, and cognitive load measurement. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 375–378.
29.
VanLehnK. (1999). Rule-learning events in the acquisition of a complex skill: An evaluation of cascade. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(1), 71–125.
30.
Van MerrienboerJ. J.SwellerJ. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 147–177.
31.
YangX.KimJ. H. (2019). Measuring workload in a multitasking environment using fractal dimension of pupil dilation. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(15), 1352–1361.
32.
YuC.-Y.KimJ. H.MostowfiS.WangF.OpreanD.SeoK. (2023). Developing an augmented reality–based interactive learning system with real-time location and motion tracking. In International conference on human–computer interaction (Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 13336, pp. 227–238). Springer Nature Switzerland.
