Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Trust research in human-AI interaction over the past decades has identified various factors influencing trust dynamics within dyadic relationships between a single human and an AI agent. The current study addresses the gap of limited exploration in non-dyadic HAI scenarios by examining trust dynamics across two referents: AI and other humans. Using a custom-developed simulated mass evacuation testbed, we focus on a multi-operator-single-AI (MOSA) scenario, where multiple individuals need to evacuate to a safe area with the assistance of an AI guide. Participants can also report roadblocks to help others at a personal cost. We investigate trust dynamics in both the AI and other humans, specifically examining how trust changes after passing each waypoint. Our goal is to understand the effects of information transparency and individual compliance and reporting behaviors (at time t) on trust dynamics (trust_t+1 − trust_t). The study highlights that trust dynamics vary significantly depending on the referent.

Keywords

trust multi-referent trust human-AI interaction multi-agent information transparency altruism compliance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chung

Holder

Shah

J. A.

Yang

(2024). Developing a team classification scheme for human-agent teaming. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.

Costa

A. C.

Fulmer

C. A.

Anderson

N. R.

(2018). Trust in work teams: An integrative review, multilevel model, and future directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(2), 169–184.

De Visser

E. J.

Peeters

M. M.

Jung

M. F.

Kohn

Shaw

T. H.

Pak

Neerincx

M. A

. (2020). Towards a theory of longitudinal trust calibration in human–robot teams. International Journal of Social Robotics, 12(2), 459–478.

Dijkstra

E. W.

(1959). A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische mathematik, 1(1), 269–271.

Fowler

J. H.

Christakis

N. A.

(2010). Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(12), 5334–5338.

Fulmer

C. A.

Gelfand

M. J.

(2012). At what level (and in whom) we trust: Trust across multiple organizational levels. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1167–1230.

Guo

Yang

X. J.

Shi

(2023, July). Enabling team of teams: A trust inference and propagation (TIP) model in multi-human multi-robot teams. In Robotics: Science and Systems XIX. (arXiv:2305.12614 [cs])

Guo

Yang

X. J.

Shi

(2024, September). TIP: A trust inference and propagation model in multi-human multi-robot teams. Autonomous Robots, 48(7), 20.

W.-J.

Chen

Jiang

L.-L.

Perc

(2024). Information sharing promotes cooperation among mobile individuals in multiplex networks. Nonlinear Dynamics, 112(22), 20339–20352.

10.

Nowak

M. A.

(2006). Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. science, 314(5805), 1560–1563.

11.

Yang

X. J.

Schemanske

Searle

(2023). Toward quantifying trust dynamics: How people adjust their trust after moment-to-moment interaction with automation. Human Factors, 65(5), 862–878.

Understanding Multi-Referent Trust in AI-Supported Evacuations: The Role of Transparency and Altruism

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References