The COVID-19 pandemic has cast into stark relief challenges to student learning during remote relative to in-person school classroom instruction. These effects can be understood from a social cybernetic perspective --- there are design limitations inherent to E-learning environments that compromise social cooperation essential to the learning process. Social cybernetics offers a comprehensive framework for understanding the patterns of social cooperation inherent to student, instructor and classmate interactions with each other, and with educational institutions, in both physical and virtual learning environments.
BendersJ.de HaanJ.BennettD. (Eds.) (1995). The Symbiosis of Work and Technology. London: Taylor & Francis.
2.
BrinkerhoffJ.KoroghlanianC.M. (2007). Online students’ expectations: enhancing the fit between online students and course design. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(4) 383-393.
3.
ByrneR.W.WhitenA. (Eds.) (1988). Machiavellian Intelligence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4.
CookeN.J.SalasE.Cannon-BowersJ.A.StoutR.J. (2000). Measuring team knowledge. Human Factors, 42(1), 151-173.
5.
DietrichR.ChildressT.M. (Eds.) (2004). Group Interaction in High Risk Environments. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
6.
DraperJ.V.KaberD.B.UsherJ.M. (1998). Telepresence. Human Factors, 40(3), 354-375.
7.
DunbarR.I.M.ShultzS. (2007). Evolution in the social brain. Science, 317(5843), 1344-1347.
8.
FoxO.H. (2005). Diversity in online teaching: when culture and online education conflict. Home Health Care Management & Practice, 17(4), 342-345.
HalloranC.JackR.OkunJ.C.OsterE. (2021). Pandemic schooling mode and student test scores: evidence from U.S. states. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research (Working Paper 29497).
11.
JohnsonD.W.JohnsonF. (1987). Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12.
JohnsonD.W.JohnsonR.T. (1989). Cooperation and Competition. Theory and Research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
13.
JohnsonD.W.MaruyamaG.JohnsonR.NelsonD.SkonL. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: a metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89(1), 47-62.
14.
KaoH.S.SmithK.U. (1971). Social feedback: determination of social learning. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 152, 289-297.
15.
KaoH.S.SmithK.U. (1977). Delayed visual feedback in inter-operator social tracking performance. Psychologia - An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 20(1), 20-27.
16.
KerrS. (2010-2011). High school online: pedagogy, preferences, and practices of three online teachers. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 39(3), 221-244.
17.
McNeeseM.D.SalasE.EndsleyM. (Eds.) (2001). New Trends in Cooperative Activities: Understanding System Dynamics in Complex Environments. Washington, D.C.: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
18.
National Science Foundation, NSF Cyber infrastructure Council (2006). Cyberinfrastructure Vision for 21st Century Discovery (Version 7.1, July 20, 2006). Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation. (available from http://www.nsf.gov/od/oci/ci-v7.pdf)
19.
OkoroJ.I.BallenB.AftermanM.AdamsonC.H.RobertsonM.M. (2021). Increasing physical activity among elementary school students during distance learning: the StandUp Kids study.Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 65th Annual Meeting, 395-397.
20.
PattersonB.McFaddenC. (2009). Attrition in online and campus degree programs. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12(2), 1–8.
21.
SalasE.FioreS.M. (Eds.) (2004). Team Cognition: Understanding the Factors That Drive Process and Performance. Washington, D.C.: APA Press.
22.
SauterS.L.SmithK.U. (1971). Social feedback: quantitative division of labor in social interactions. Journal of Cybernetics, 1(2), 80-93.
23.
SchmidtR.A.LeeT.D. (1999). Motor Control and Learning. A Behavioral Emphasis. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
24.
SchneiderW. (1985). Training high performance skills: fallacies and guidelines. Human Factors, 27(3), 285-300.
25.
SmithK.U. (1972). Cybernetic psychology. In
SingerR.N. (Ed.), The Psychomotor Domain (pp. 285-348). New York: Lea and Febiger.
26.
SmithK.U.SmithM.F. (1966). Cybernetic principles of learning and educational design. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
27.
SmithT.J. (2013). Designing learning environments to promote student learning – ergonomics in all but name. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 44, S39-S60.
28.
SmithT.J. (2018). Ergonomic and ecological perspectives. In
HenningM.A.KrägelohC.U.DryerR.MoirF.BillingtonR.HillA.G. (Eds.). Well-Being in Higher Education: Cultivating a Healthy Lifestyle among Faculty and Students (Chap. 15). New York: Routledge.
29.
SmithT.J.HenningR.A.SmithK.U. (1995). Performance of hybrid automated systems - a social cybernetic analysis. International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing, 5(1), 29-51.
30.
SmithT.J.RacineS.BhuanantanondhP. (2001). Human Factors/Ergonomics Issues with Online and Distance Education. In Virtual Conference Proceedings, ‘Home on the Web: The Challenges and Opportunities of Online Learning Communities.’ Minneapolis, MN: The Collaboration for the Advancement of College Teaching & Learning.
31.
SmithT.J.SmithK.U. (1987). Feedback-control mechanisms of human behavior. In
SalvendyG. (Ed.), Handbook of Human Factors (Chap. 2.9, pp. 251- 293). New York: Wiley.
32.
SmithT.J.SmithK.U. (1988). The cybernetic basis of human behavior and performance. In
GregPat Williams (Eds.), Continuing the Conversation. A Newsletter of Ideas in Cybernetics. Special Issue on Behavioral Cybernetics (Number 15, pp. 1-28, Winter). Gravel Switch, KY: HortIdeas.
33.
StoneN.J. (2021). Understanding learning environments, personality, and proctoring during mandatory remote delivery. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 65th Annual Meeting, 767-770.
34.
VergesJ. (2021). Study: remote instruction reduced learning. St. Paul Pioneer Press (Nov. 20), 1A.
