One-Staged Simultaneous Soft Tissue and Metatarsal Reconstruction With Free Vascularized Bone Flaps for Traumatic Open Type III Foot Injury: A Clinical Series and Literature-Based Reconstructive Strategy
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online March, 2026
One-Staged Simultaneous Soft Tissue and Metatarsal Reconstruction With Free Vascularized Bone Flaps for Traumatic Open Type III Foot Injury: A Clinical Series and Literature-Based Reconstructive Strategy
Severe Gustilo-III foot injuries that combine segmental bone loss with extensive soft tissue damage remain challenging. One-stage reconstruction with a free fibular vascularized bone flap (FVBF) or free iliac vascularized bone flap (IVBF) offers the advantages of immediate skeletal stability, soft tissue resurfacing, and early mobilization, but contemporary outcome data are limited.
Methods:
From December of 2000 to November 2021, 6 patients who sustained from severe traumatic metatarsal, tarsal bone, and soft tissue defects were treated with a FVBF or IVBF incorporating soft tissue was used to reconstruct the metatarsal/tarsal bones and the soft tissue defect. Demographics, defect characteristics, perioperative variables, time to weightbearing, radiographic union, and complications were analyzed. Systematic literature review was performed to derive an evidence-graded reconstructive framework for managing Gustilo-Anderson type III open foot fractures.
Results:
Median length of follow-up is 24 months (range: 13 months to 2 years); all patients were able to walk independently and have returned to work. Six patients (mean age 32.8 ± 12.12 years) with defects of 8 to 22 cm were included. Partial weightbearing began at postoperative 10 weeks and mean return-to-work interval was 9.08 months. One partial muscle/skin necrosis (16.6%), 1 osteomyelitis (16.6%), and 1 venous congestion (16.6%) were observed postoperatively. No flap failure, nonunion, gait disturbance, instability, or amputation occurred.
Conclusion:
In this small consecutive series, single-stage free FVBF/IVBF reconstruction for Gustilo-Anderson type III foot injuries showed satisfactory union and a low infection rate. These findings support free FVBF/IVBF as a promising reconstructive strategy for complex foot trauma.
SongLZhangZWangY, et al. Reconstruction of a complex foot injury with free remodeled fibular osteocutaneous flap: a case report and literature review. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;57:610-614.
2.
LykoudisEGDimitriosPAlexandrosBE. One-stage reconstruction of the complex midfoot defect with a multiple osteotomized free fibular osteocutaneous flap: case report and literature review. Microsurgery. 2010;30:64-69.
3.
SalgadoCJLinC-HFullerDADuncanANCamisonLMardiniS. Foot salvage after loss of the first and second metatarsal rays with a free fibular osteocutaneous flap. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2011;101:531-536.
4.
MosconaRAUllmannYHirshowitzB. Free composite serratus anterior muscle–rib flap for reconstruction of severely damaged foot. Ann Plast Surg. 1988;20:167.
5.
KurokawaMMuneuchiGHamagamiHFujitaH. Reconstruction of four metatarsal bone and soft-tissue defects using a serratus anterior muscle rib osteomyocutaneous free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101:1616-1619.
6.
TanOAtikBErgenD. Management of a composite foot defect due to mine explosion using the free fibula osteocutaneous flap. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2008;24:53-56.
7.
RollCPrantlLNerlichMKinnerB. Osteo-fasciocutaneous parascapular flap transfer for reconstruction of the first ray of the foot. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008;128:857-863.
8.
KitsiouCPerrotPDuteilleF. La reconstruction des pertes de substance complexes du pied par lambeau libre ostéomusculaire de serratus anterior-côte : à propos de quatre cas. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2013;58:321-326.
9.
YamashitaYHashimotoIGoishiKFukunagaYAbeYNakanishiH. Reconstruction of metatarsal bone defects with a free fibular osteomyocutaneous flap incorporating soleus muscle. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66:277-280.
10.
WangC-YHanPChaiY-MLuS-DZhongW-R. Pedicled fibular flap for reconstruction of composite defects in foot. Injury. 2015;46:405-410.
11.
UnalMBSekerADemiralpBSahinMCiftHTOltuluI. Reconstruction of traumatic composite tissue defect of medial longitudinal arch with free osteocutaneous fibular graft. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;55:333-337.
12.
ArnežZMTroisiLColavittiG, et al. Reconstruction of the weightbearing area of the foot with vascularized chimeric osteocutaneous fibular flap: a case report. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020;59:128-130.
13.
GuptaRPfennigMGannonJ, et al. Utilization of the free fibular flap for first metatarsal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022;10:e4706.
14.
YajimaHTamaiSKobataYMurataKFukuiATakakuraY. Vascularized composite tissue transfers or open fractures with massive soft-tissue defects in the lower extremities. Microsurgery. 2002;22:114-121.
15.
UlusalBGLinY-TUlusalAELinC-HYenJ-T. Reconstruction of foot defects with free lateral arm fasciocutaneous flaps: analysis of fifty patients. Microsurgery. 2005;25:581-588.
16.
ZhuY-LWangYHeX-QZhuMLiF-BXuY-Q. Foot and ankle reconstruction: an experience on the use of 14 different flaps in 226 cases. Microsurgery. 2013;33:600-604.
17.
BibboC. The free fibula flap for lower extremity reconstruction. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2021;38:117-130.
18.
DemiralpBEgeTKoseOYurttasYBasbozkurtM. Amputation versus functional reconstruction in the management of complex hind foot injuries caused by land-mine explosions: a long-term retrospective comparison. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014;24:621-626.
19.
BroskyTA2ndMannJJDunnSPGonzalezGW. Staged reconstruction of a multiplane post-traumatic deformity: a case report. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;53:456-465.
20.
Godoy-SantosASchepersT. Soft-tissue injury to the foot and ankle: literature review and staged management protocol. Acta Ortop Bras. 2019;27:223-229.
21.
JonardBDeanE. Posttraumatic reconstruction of the foot and ankle in the face of active infection. Orthop Clin North Am. 2017;48:249-258.
22.
LeeY-KJeonMHoJ-W. Staged treatment with arterial reconstruction and flap transplantation for ischemic mangled extremity: an observational study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103:e38385.
23.
BattistonBSantoroDBaidoRLPasqueroF. Treatment of acute bone defects in severe lower limb Trauma. Injury. 2019;50:S40-S45.
24.
KorompiliasAVSoucacosPN. Vascularized bone grafts in trauma and reconstructive microsurgery, part 1. Microsurgery. 2009;29:337-341.
25.
AkaranuchatN. Lower extremity reconstruction with vascularized free-tissue transfer: 20 years of experience in the faculty of medicine Siriraj hospital, Mahidol university, Bangkok, Thailand. Siriraj Med J. 2021;73:462-470.
26.
PetrellaGTosiDPantaleoniFAdaniR. Vascularized bone grafts for post-traumatic defects in the upper extremity. Arch Plast Surg. 2021;48:84-90.
27.
Ebad AliSMRazakSKhanWF, et al. Outcomes of reconstruction with vascularized vs non vascularized bone graft after resection of bone tumours—a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2023;35:307-312.
28.
Di SummaPGde SchoulepnikoffCGuillierD, et al. Orthoplastic limb reconstruction using free fibula flap after trauma: outcomes from a retrospective European multicenter study. Microsurgery. 2024;44:e31054.
29.
ArchualAJBishopATShinAY. Vascularized bone grafts in orthopaedic surgery: a review of options and indications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022;30:60-69.
30.
GuidiMGuzziniMCivitengaC, et al. Multifactorial analysis of treatment of long-bone nonunion with vascularized and nonvascularized bone grafts. J Hand Microsurg. 2023;15:106-115.
31.
KitaokaHBAlexanderIJAdelaarRSNunleyJAMyersonMSSandersM. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15(7):349-353.
32.
WhelanDBBhandariMMcKeeMD, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variation in the assessment of the healing of tibial fractures after intramedullary fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84-B:15-18.
33.
WhelanDBBhandariMStephenD, et al. Development of the radiographic union score for tibial fractures for the assessment of tibial fracture healing after intramedullary fixation. J Trauma. 2010;68:629-632.
34.
HalperinJLLevineGNAl-KhatibSM, et al. Further evolution of the ACC/AHA clinical practice guideline recommendation classification system: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2016;133(14):1426-1428.
35.
ClavienPABarkunJde OliveiraML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187-196.
36.
Noorlander-BorgdorffMPAlkemadeEMJvan der SluisWB, et al. Long-term results and patient-reported outcomes after vascularized fibular graft use in the treatment of post-traumatic bone defects of femur shaft and tibia: a retrospective cohort and cross-sectional survey study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024;98:144-157.
37.
CaoZLiCHeJ, et al. Early reconstruction delivered better outcomes for severe open fracture of lower extremities: a 15-year retrospective study. J Clin Med. 2022;11:7174.
38.
SchaefferCVStranixJT. Tackling bone loss of the lower extremity: vascularized bone grafting. Plast Aesthet Res. 2022;9:27.
39.
PiccatoACrosioAAntoniniA, et al. Single-stage versus two-stage bone flap reconstruction in chronic osteomyelitis: multicenter outcomes comparison. Microsurgery. 2024;44:e31139.
40.
LeseIBiedermannRConstantinescuMGrobbelaarAOOlariuR. Predicting risk factors that lead to free flap failure and vascular compromise: a single unit experience with 565 free tissue transfers. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021;74:512-522.
41.
PedreiraRSiotosCChoB, et al. Vascularized bone grafting for reconstruction of oncologic defects in the spine: a systematic review and pooled analysis of the literature. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018;34:708-718.
42.
GilbertRSWolfeSW. Vascularized fibula grafts. In: LiebermanJRFriedlaenderGE, eds. Bone Regeneration and Repair. Humana Press; 2005:311-336.
43.
TuY-KYenC-Y. Role of vascularized bone grafts in lower extremity osteomyelitis. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007;38:37-49.
44.
YoussefMAbdalMoneim HafezMElsayed SemayaAEl-SayedA. Evaluation of the results of reconstruction of large bony defects of humerus using vascularized bone grafts. J Hand Microsurg. 2025;17:100198.
45.
PaulSVathulyaMKandwalPJagtapMBehlR. Comparative analysis of free vascularized fibula grafting and Ilizarov bone transport in management of segmental long bone defect of the lower limb: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop. 2024;50:84-91.
46.
FeltriPSolaroLErraniCSchiavonGCandrianCFilardoG. Vascularized fibular grafts for the treatment of long bone defects: pros and cons. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021;143:29-48.
47.
TorosTOzaksarK. Reconstruction of traumatic tubular bone defects using vascularized fibular graft. Injury. 2021;52:2926-2934.
48.
CariatiPArroyo RodriguezSPampin OzanDFerriAFerrariS. Iliac crest free flap: indications, tips and pitfalls. Front Oral Maxillofac Med. 2020;2:15.
49.
CaoZ-MSuiX-LXiaoYQingL-MWuP-FTangJ-Y. Efficacy comparison of vascularized iliac crest bone flap and Ilizarov bone transport in the treatment of traumatic bone defects of the tibia combined with large soft tissue defects. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18:349.
50.
MasqueletACKishiTBenkoPE. Very long-term results of post-traumatic bone defect reconstruction by the induced membrane technique. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105:159-166.
51.
SteffensonLRoszmanAWallaceC, et al. Induced membrane technique is effective for the management of acute traumatic bone loss in both diaphyseal and metaphyseal lower extremity fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2023;37:e194-e199.
52.
AziMLTeixeiraAACotiasRBJoerisAKfuriMJr.Membrane induced osteogenesis in the management of posttraumatic bone defects. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30:545-550.
53.
TaylorBCHancockJZitzkeRCastanedaJ. Treatment of bone loss with the induced membrane technique. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29:554-557.
54.
KołodziejczykKRopielewskiAGarlewiczRZłotorowiczMCzubakJ. Clinical observations of the effectiveness of the Masquelet induced membrane technique in the treatment of critical long-bone defects of the lower and upper extremities. Medicina (Kaunas). 2024;60:1933.
55.
GiannoudisPVHarwoodPJTosounidisTKanakarisNK. Restoration of long bone defects treated with the induced membrane technique: protocol and outcomes. Injury. 2016;47:S53-S61.
56.
GiotikasDTaraziNSpaldingLNabergojMKrkovicM. Results of the induced membrane technique in the management of traumatic bone loss in the lower limb: a cohort study. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33:131-136.
57.
AndrzejowskiPMasqueletAGiannoudisPV. Induced membrane technique (Masquelet) for bone defects in the distal tibia, foot, and ankle: Systematic review, case presentations, tips, and techniques. Foot Ankle Clin. 2020;25:537-586.
58.
MengCYeSJingJ. Masquelet technique combined with flap transplantation for infectious bone and soft tissue defects of lower leg. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020;34:756-760.
59.
ChoJ-WKentWTKimJ-K, et al. Outcome of multi-staged induced membrane technique based on post-debridement cultures for the management of critical-sized bone defect following fracture-related infection. Sci Rep. 2022;12:22637.
60.
WuJ-HBaoQ-WWangS-KZhouP-YXuS-G. Mechanisms of the Masquelet technique to promote bone defect repair and its influencing factors. Chin J Traumatol. 2025;28:157-163.
61.
AziMLde Almeida TeixeiraAACotiasRBJoerisAKfuriM. Induced-membrane technique in the management of posttraumatic bone defects. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2019;9:e22.
62.
ShenJWeiZWangS, et al. Treatment of infected bone defects with the induced membrane technique. Bone Joint Res. 2023;12:546-558.
63.
FreseJSchulzAPKowaldBGerlachU-JFroschK-HSchoopR. Treatment outcome of the Masquelet technique in 195 infected bone defects–a single-center, retrospective case series. Injury. 2023;54:110923.
64.
ChangLSKimDKHwangKTKimYHKimSW. A modified induced membrane 2-stage technique using a thoracodorsal artery perforator free flap followed by vascularized or non-vascularized free fibular transfer for the treatment of complex bone infection with concomitant severe soft tissue lesion—a case series of 9 cases. Injury. 2023;54:110956.
65.
CombalAThuauFFouasson-ChaillouxA, et al. Preliminary results of the “Capasquelet” technique for managing femoral bone defects—combining a Masquelet induced membrane and Capanna vascularized fibula with an allograft. J Pers Med. 2021;11:774.
66.
PiacentiniFCegliaMJBettiniLBiancoSBuzziRCampanacciDA. Induced membrane technique using enriched bone grafts for treatment of posttraumatic segmental long bone defects. J Orthop Traumatol. 2019;20:13. doi:10.1186/s10195-019-0522-6
67.
QiuX-SZhengXShiH-FXuG-YChenY-X. Induced membrane technique combined with a free vascularized fibula flap for the management of a severe acute femoral bone loss: a case report and literature review. J Reconstr Microsurg Open. 2017;2:e15-e18.
68.
ZhenPHuY-YLuoZ-JLiuX-YLuHLiX-S. One-stage treatment and reconstruction of Gustilo type III open tibial shaft fractures with a vascularized fibular osteoseptocutaneous flap graft. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:745-751.
69.
MotsitsiNS. Masquelet’s technique for management of long bone defects: from experiment to clinical application. East Cent Afr J Surg. 2012;17:43-47.
70.
YazarSLinCHWeiFC. One-stage reconstruction of composite bone and soft-tissue defects in traumatic lower extremities. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(6):1457-1466.
71.
CapannaRCampanacciDABelotN, et al. A new reconstructive technique for intercalary defects of long bones: the association of massive allograft with vascularized fibular autograft. Long-term results and comparison with alternative techniques. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007;38:51-60, vi.
72.
GongXCuiJJiangZMaharjanSLuLLiX. Comparison of perioperative complications of pedicled island flap in reconstruction of extremities. J Surg Res. 2017;220:94-104.
73.
KangMJChungCHChangYJKimKH. Reconstruction of the lower extremity using free flaps. Arch Plast Surg. 2013;40:575-583.
74.
BarretteL-XFowlerCCHendersonSR, et al. Does preoperative wound infection impact outcomes of lower extremity salvage via microvascular free flap reconstruction? A cohort study. Orthoplastic Surg. 2021;6:11-14.
75.
CepasAKiiskiJMajavaMKholováIKaartinenI. Myth-busting the zone-of-injury concept: a prospective study on the vascular response to high-energy lower extremity trauma. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024;154:190e-198e.
76.
StepanovsJOzoliņaARovīteVMamajaBVanagsI. Factors affecting the risk of free flap failure in microvascular surgery. Proc Latv Acad Sci B Nat Exact Appl Sci. 2016;70:356-364.
77.
Habarth-MoralesTEDavisHDRios-DiazAJ, et al. The Godina principle in the 21st century: free flap timing after isolated lower extremity trauma in a retrospective national cohort. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2025;41:469-477.
78.
HatzenbuehlerJRPullingTJ. Diagnosis and management of osteomyelitis. Am Fam Physician. 2011;84:1027-1033.
79.
BuryDRogersTDickmanMM. Osteomyelitis: diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2021;104:395-402.
80.
YajimaHKobataYShigematsuK, et al. Vascularized fibular grafting in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis and infected nonunion. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2004;20:13-20.
81.
PanteliMGiannoudisPV. Chronic osteomyelitis: what the surgeon needs to know. EFORT Open Rev. 2016;1:128-135.
82.
ArshadZLauEJAslamAThahirAKrkovicM. Management of chronic osteomyelitis of the femur and tibia: a scoping review. EFORT Open Rev. 2021;6:704-715.
83.
SmolleCHolzer-GeisslerJCJMandalP, et al. The vascularized fibula as salvage procedure in extremity reconstruction: a retrospective analysis of time to heal and possible confounders. Life (Basel). 2024;14:318.
84.
AliGMajidAAlmasDHameedSAslamRKhanZA. Donor site morbidity of fibular flap. Pak Armed Force Med J. 2021;71:387-391.
85.
WuHMaoJZhaiZ, et al. Analysis of related factors of long-term complications after vascularized fibular transplantation. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26:6961-6971.
86.
LiPFangQQiJLuoRSunC. Risk factors for early and late donor-site morbidity after free fibula flap harvest. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73:1637-1640.
87.
TaylorGMillerGDHamFJ. The free vascularized bone graft: a clinical extension of microvascular techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975;55:533-544.
88.
MoraisJAzevedoMBaptistaDGasparCZenhaHCostaH. Iliac crest free flap: a reappraisal of indications and donor site complications. Eur J Plast Surg. 2022;45:293-297.
89.
BoehmKSAl-TahaMMorzyckiASamargandiOAAl-YouhaSLeBlancMR. Donor site morbidities of iliac crest bone graft in craniofacial surgery: a systematic review. Ann Plast Surg. 2019;83:352-358.
90.
HilvenPHBaylissLCoskerT, et al. The vascularised fibular graft for limb salvage after bone tumour surgery. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B:853-861.
91.
NiethardMTiedkeCAndreouD, et al. Bilateral fibular graft: biological reconstruction after resection of primary malignant bone tumors of the lower limb. Sarcoma. 2013;2013:1-8.
92.
DomsonGFScarboroughMT. The use of a vascularized fibular autograft and massive allograft for reconstruction after intercalary resection of the tibia and femur for tumor. Tech Orthop. 2007;22:116-120.
93.
El-GammalTAEl-SayedAKotbMM. Microsurgical reconstruction of lower limb bone defects following tumor resection using vascularized fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap. Microsurgery. 2002;22:193-198.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
