Abstract
Background:
The initial ultimate load for graft fixation is one of the essential factors in the reconstruction of lateral ankle ligaments. Several anchoring devices have been developed to fix the substitute ligament into the bone. A fair comparison of these fixation methods warrant a reproducible examination system. The purpose of this study was to make an experimental animal model and to compare the initial ultimate loads of 3 graft fixation methods, including the use of EndoButton (EB), interference screw (IFS), and a novel socket anchoring (SA) technique.
Methods:
Porcine calcaneus bones and 5-mm-wide split bovine Achilles tendons were used as fixation bases and graft materials, respectively. Both ends were firmly sutured side-by-side, using the circumferential ligation technique as a double-strand substitute that was 45 mm in length. Porcine calcanei with similar characteristics to adult human calcanei were mounted on a tensile testing machine, and substitutes were fixed into bones using the 3 fixation methods. A polyester tape was passed through the tendon loop and connected to a crosshead jig of the testing machine. The initial ultimate loads were measured in 15 specimens for each fixation method to simulate a lateral ankle ligament (LAL) injury.
Results:
The ultimate loads (ULs) were 223.6 ± 52.7 N for EB, 229.7 ± 39.7 N for SA, and 208.8 ± 65.3 N for IFS. No statistically significant difference was observed among the 3 groups (P = .571). All failures occurred at the bone–ligament substitute interface.
Conclusion:
The initial ULs in all 3 fixation methods were sufficient for clinical usage. These values were larger than the UL of the anterior talofibular ligament; however, these were smaller than the UL of the calcaneofibular ligament.
Clinical Relevance:
In an experimental animal model, ULs for SA, EB, and IFS techniques showed no significant difference. All failures were observed in the fixation site of the calcaneus and were overwhelmingly related to suture fixation failure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
