Periprosthetic osteolysis is a common occurrence after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) and poses many challenges for the foot and ankle surgeon. Osteolysis may be asymptomatic and remain benign, or it may lead to component instability and require revision or arthrodesis. In this article, we present a current and comprehensive review of osteolysis in TAA with illustrative cases. We examine the basic science principles behind the etiology of osteolysis, discuss the workup of a patient with suspected osteolysis, and present a review of the evidence of various management strategies, including grafting of cysts, revision TAA, and arthrodesis.
AspenbergPGoodmanSToksvig-LarsenSRydLAlbrektssonT.Intermittent micromotion inhibits bone ingrowth. Titanium implants in rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand. 1992;63(2):141-145.
2.
AtkinsGJWelldonKJHoldingCAHaynesDRHowieDWFindlayDM.The induction of a catabolic phenotype in human primary osteoblasts and osteocytes by polyethylene particles. Biomaterials. 2009;30(22):3672-3681.
3.
BauerGEberhardtORosenbaumDClaesL.Total ankle replacement. Review and critical analysis of the current status. Foot Ankle Surg. 1996;2(2):119-126.
4.
BaumannBSeufertJJakobF, et al. Activation of NF-kappaB signalling and TNFalpha-expression in THP-1 macrophages by TiAlV- and polyethylene-wear particles. J Orthop Res. 2005;23(6):1241-1248.
5.
BeanBAConnorPMSchiffernSCHamidN.Outpatient shoulder arthroplasty at an ambulatory surgery center using a multimodal pain management approach. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018;2(10):e064.
6.
BedairHTingNJacovidesC, et al. The Mark Coventry Award: diagnosis of early postoperative TKA infection using synovial fluid analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(1):34-40.
7.
BerkowitzMJClareMPWallingAKSandersR.Salvage of failed total ankle arthroplasty with fusion using structural allograft and internal fixation. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(5):S493-S502.
8.
BesseJ-LLienhartCFessyM-H.Outcomes following cyst curettage and bone grafting for the management of periprosthetic cystic evolution after AES total ankle replacement. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2013;30(2):157-170.
9.
BischoffJEFrymanJCParcellJOrozco VillasenorDA.Influence of crosslinking on the wear performance of polyethylene within total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(4):369-376.
10.
Bolton-MaggsBGSudlowRAFreemanMA.Total ankle arthroplasty. A long-term review of the London Hospital experience. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67(5):785-790.
11.
BonninMGaudotFLaurentJREllisSColombierJAJudetT.The Salto total ankle arthroplasty: survivorship and analysis of failures at 7 to 11 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(1):225-236.
12.
BoyerBBordiniBCaputoDNeriTSteaSToniA.Is cross-linked polyethylene an improvement over conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene in total knee arthroplasty?J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(3):908-914.
13.
BrulefertKCordovaLABrulinB, et al. Pro-osteoclastic in vitro effect of polyethylene-like nanoparticles: involvement in the pathogenesis of implant aseptic loosening. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016;104(11):2649-2657.
14.
BrunnerSBargAKnuppM, et al. The Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement: long-term, eleven to fifteen-year, survivorship analysis of the prosthesis in seventy-two consecutive patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(8):711-718.
15.
BuchholzHWEngelbrechtESiegelA.Complete ankle joint endoprosthesis type “St. Georg.” Article in German. Chirurg1973;44(5):241-244.
16.
CampbellP.Arthrodesis of the ankle with modified distraction-compression and bone-grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72(4):552-556.
17.
CarlssonASMontgomeryFBesjakovJ.Arthrodesis of the ankle secondary to replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19(4):240-245.
18.
ChryssikosTParviziJGhanemENewbergAZhuangHAlaviA.FDG-PET imaging can diagnose periprosthetic infection of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(6):1338-1342.
19.
ClausAMEnghCAJrSychterzCJXenosJSOrishimoKFEnghCASr. Radiographic definition of pelvic osteolysis following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(8):1519-1526.
20.
CodyEAScottDJEasleyME.Total ankle arthroplasty: a critical analysis review. JBJS Rev. 2018;6(8):e8.
21.
CottrinoSFabrègueDCowieAP, et al. Wear study of total ankle replacement explants by microstructural analysis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;61:1-11.
22.
CracchioloAIIIDeorioJK.Design features of current total ankle replacements: implants and instrumentation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg2008;16(9):530-540.
23.
DalatFBarnoudRFessyMHBesseJL.Histologic study of periprosthetic osteolytic lesions after AES total ankle replacement. A 22 case series. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(6 suppl):S285-S295.
24.
DeanDDSchwartzZBlanchardCR, et al. Ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene particles have direct effects on proliferation, differentiation, and local factor production of MG63 osteoblast-like cells. J Orthop Res. 1999;17(1):9-17.
25.
DevriesJGBerletGCLeeTHHyerCFDeorioJK.Revision total ankle replacement: an early look at agility to INBONE. Foot Ankle Spec. 2011;4(4):235-244.
26.
EasleyMEVertulloCJUrbanWCNunleyJA.Total ankle arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002;10(3):157-167.
27.
EllingtonJKGuptaSMyersonMS.Management of failures of total ankle replacement with the agility total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(23):2112-2118.
28.
EspinosaNWaltiMFavrePSnedekerJG.Misalignment of total ankle components can induce high joint contact pressures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(5):1179-1187.
29.
FukudaTHaddadSLRenYZhangLQ.Impact of talar component rotation on contact pressure after total ankle arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31(5):404-411.
30.
GlazebrookMAArsenaultKDunbarM.Evidence-based classification of complications in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(10):945-949.
31.
GoodmanSB.The effects of micromotion and particulate materials on tissue differentiation. Bone chamber studies in rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1994;258:1-43.
32.
GoodmanSBGalloJ.Periprosthetic osteolysis: mechanisms, prevention and treatment. J Clin Med. 2019;8(12):2091.
33.
GoswamiKParviziJMaxwell CourtneyP.Current recommendations for the diagnosis of acute and chronic PJI for hip and knee-cell counts, alpha-defensin, leukocyte esterase, next-generation sequencing. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018;11(3):428-438.
34.
GrossCEricksonBJAdamsSBParekhSG.Ankle arthrodesis after failed total ankle replacement: a systematic review of the literature. Foot Ankle Spec. 2015;8(2):143-151.
35.
GrossCEHuhJGreenC, et al. Outcomes of bone grafting of bone cysts after total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;37(2):157-164.
36.
GrossCEPalancaAADeOrioJK.Design rationale for total ankle arthroplasty systems: an update. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018;26(10):353-359.
37.
HaddadSLCoetzeeJCEstokRFahrbachKBanelDNalysnykL.Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. A systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(9):1899-1905.
38.
HannaRSHaddadSLLazarusML.Evaluation of periprosthetic lucency after total ankle arthroplasty: helical CT versus conventional radiography. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(8):921-926.
39.
HaytmanekCTJrGrossCEasleyMENunleyJA.Radiographic outcomes of a mobile-bearing total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int2015;36(9):1038-1044.
40.
HintermannBZwickyLKnuppMHenningerHBBargA.HINTEGRA revision arthroplasty for failed total ankle prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(13):1166-1174.
41.
HopgoodPKumarRWoodPL.Ankle arthrodesis for failed total ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(8):1032-1038.
42.
HorisbergerMHenningerHBValderrabanoVBargA.Bone augmentation for revision total ankle arthroplasty with large bone defects. Acta Orthop2015;86(4):412-414.
43.
HsuARHaddadSLMyersonMS.Evaluation and management of the painful total ankle arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015;23(5):272-282
44.
JehanSHillSO.Operative technique of two parallel compression screws and autologous bone graft for ankle arthrodesis after failed total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(9):767-771.
45.
JonckJHMyersonMS.Revision total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Clin. 2012;17(4):687-706.
46.
KamradIHenricsonAMagnussonHCarlssonÅRosengrenBE.Outcome after salvage arthrodesis for failed total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(3):255-261.
47.
KempsonGEFreemanMATukeMA.Engineering considerations in the design of an ankle joint. Biomed Eng. 1975;10(5):166-171, 80.
48.
KienapfelHSpreyCWilkeAGrissP.Implant fixation by bone ingrowth. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14(3):355-368.
49.
KitaokaHBRomnessDW.Arthrodesis for failed ankle arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1992;7(3):277-284.
50.
KobayashiAMinodaYKadoyaYOhashiHTakaokaKSaltzmanCL.Ankle arthroplasties generate wear particles similar to knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;424:69-72.
51.
KoivuHKohonenISipolaEAlanenKVahlbergTTiusanenH.Severe periprosthetic osteolytic lesions after the Ankle Evolutive System total ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(7):907-914.
52.
KoivuHMackiewiczZTakakuboYTrokovicNPajarinenJKonttinenYT.RANKL in the osteolysis of AES total ankle replacement implants. Bone. 2012;51(3):546-552.
53.
KoivuHTakakuboYMackiewiczZ, et al. Autoinflammation around AES total ankle replacement implants. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(12):1455-1462.
54.
KrauseFGWindolfMBoraBPennerMJWingKJYoungerAS.Impact of complications in total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis analyzed with a validated outcome measurement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(9):830-839.
55.
LachmanJRRamosJAAdamsSBNunleyJAIIEasleyMEDeOrioJK.Patient-reported outcomes before and after primary and revision total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2019;40(1):34-41.
56.
LachmanJRRamosJAAdamsSBNunleyJAEasleyMEDeOrioJK.Revision surgery for metal component failure in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2019;4(1):2473011418813026.
57.
LaverniaCJ.Cost-effectiveness of early surgical intervention in silent osteolysis. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13(3):277-279.
58.
LefrancoisTYoungerAWingK, et al. A prospective study of four total ankle arthroplasty implants by non-designer investigators. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(4):342-348.
59.
LiSYMyersonMS.Management of talar component subsidence. Foot Ankle Clin. 2017;22(2):361-389.
60.
LucasyHernandezJLaffenêtreOToullecEDarcelVChauveauxD.AKILE™ total ankle arthroplasty: clinical and CT scan analysis of periprosthetic cysts. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(8):907-915.
61.
MasonLWWyattJButcherCWieshmannHMolloyAP.Single-photon-emission computed tomography in painful total ankle replacements. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(6):635-640.
62.
McInnesKAYoungerASOxlandTR.Initial instability in total ankle replacement: a cadaveric biomechanical investigation of the STAR and agility prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(17):e147.
63.
NaudieDDAmmeenDJEnghGARorabeckCH.Wear and osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15(1):53-64.
64.
NoordinSMasriB.Periprosthetic osteolysis: genetics, mechanisms and potential therapeutic interventions. Can J Surg. 2012;55(6):408-417.
65.
NunleyJAAdamsSBEasleyMEDeOrioJK.Prospective randomized trial comparing mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2019;40(11):1239-1248.
66.
OralEMuratogluOK.Radiation cross-linking in ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene for orthopaedic applications. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B. 2007;265(1):18-22.
67.
PappasMBuechelFFDePalmaAF.Cylindrical total ankle joint replacement: surgical and biomechanical rationale. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;118:82-92.
68.
ParviziJZmistowskiBBerbariEF, et al. New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(11):2992-2994.
69.
PattonDKiewietNBrageM.Infected total ankle arthroplasty: risk factors and treatment options. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(6):626-634.
70.
PaulJBargAHorisbergerMHerreraMHenningerHBValderrabanoV.Ankle salvage surgery with autologous circular pillar fibula augmentation and intramedullary hindfoot nail. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;53(5):601-605.
71.
PilliarRMLeeJMManiatopoulosC.Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;208:108-113.
72.
PugelyAJLuXAmendolaACallaghanJJMartinCTCramP.Trends in the use of total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis in the United States Medicare population. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(3):207-215.
73.
RahmSKlammerGBenningerEGerberFFarshadMEspinosaN.Inferior results of salvage arthrodesis after failed ankle replacement compared to primary arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(4):349-359.
74.
RenWWuBPengXHuaJHaoHNWooleyPH.Implant wear induces inflammation, but not osteoclastic bone resorption, in RANK(–/–) mice. J Orthop Res. 2006;24(8):1575-1586.
75.
RodriguezDBevernageBDMaldaguePDeleuPATribakKLeemrijseT.Medium term follow-up of the AES ankle prosthesis: high rate of asymptomatic osteolysis. Foot Ankle Surg. 2010;16(2):54-60.
76.
RoukisTSPrisselMA.Management of extensive talar osteolysis with Agility™ total ankle replacement systems using geometric metal-reinforced polymethylmethacrylate cement augmentation. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;53(1):108-113.
77.
RydLLinderL.On the correlation between micromotion and histology of the bone-cement interface: report of three cases of knee arthroplasty followed by Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. J Arthroplasty. 1989;4(4):303-309.
78.
SaltzmanCLMannRAAhrensJE, et al. Prospective controlled trial of STAR total ankle replacement versus ankle fusion: initial results. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(7):579-596.
79.
SamuelsonKMFreemanMATukeMA.Development and evolution of the ICLH ankle replacement. Foot Ankle. 1982;3(1):32-36.
80.
SatoTNakashimaYAkiyamaM, et al. Wear resistant performance of highly cross-linked and annealed ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene against ceramic heads in total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2012;30(12):2031-2037.
81.
SchipperONHaddadSLFullamSPourzalRWimmerMA.Wear Characteristics of conventional ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene versus highly cross-linked polyethylene in Total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(11):1335-1344.
82.
SchipperONHaddadSLPytelPZhouY.Histological analysis of early osteolysis in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38(4):351-359.
83.
SchwarzEMLuAPGoaterJJ, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha/nuclear transcription factor-kappaB signaling in periprosthetic osteolysis. J Orthop Res. 2000;18(3):472-480.
84.
SerinoJKunzeKNJacobsenSK, et al. Nuclear medicine for the orthopedic foot and ankle surgeon. Foot Ankle Int. 2020;41(5):612-623.
85.
SinghGReichardTHameisterR, et al. Ballooning osteolysis in 71 failed total ankle arthroplasties. Acta Orthop. 2016;87(4):401-405.
86.
SkyttäETKoivuHEskelinenAIkävalkoMPaavolainenPRemesV.Total ankle replacement: a population-based study of 515 cases from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2010;81(1):114-118.
87.
SpirtAAAssalMHansenSTJr.Complications and failure after total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(6):1172-1178.
88.
SundfeldtMV CarlssonLB JohanssonCThomsenPGretzerC.Aseptic loosening, not only a question of wear: a review of different theories. Acta Orthop. 2006;77(2):177-197.
89.
TownshendDNgPWingKPennerMYoungerA.SPECT-CT to evaluate painful total ankle replacement. Orthop. Proc. 2012;94-B(suppl XLIII):44-44.
90.
TrincatSGaudotFLavigneF.Total ankle arthroplasty and bone defects: results of autologous bone grafts at more than two years. Article in French. Rev Chir Orthop Trauma. 2011;97:S238-S239.
91.
UçkayIPedowitzDAssalMStullJD.What tests are useful to investigate a possible infection of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA)? What are their thresholds?Foot Ankle Int. 2019;40(1 suppl):22s-23s.
92.
van WijngaardenRvan der PlaatLNieuwe WemeRADoetsHCWestergaJHaverkampD.Etiopathogenesis of osteolytic cysts associated with total ankle arthroplasty, a histological study. Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;21(2):132-136.
93.
VickerstaffJAMilesAWCunninghamJL.A brief history of total ankle replacement and a review of the current status. Med Eng Phys. 2007;29(10):1056-1064.
94.
WaldeTAWeilandDELeungSB, et al. Comparison of CT, MRI, and radiographs in assessing pelvic osteolysis: a cadaveric study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;437:138-144.
95.
WilkinsonJMHamerAJStockleyIEastellR.Polyethylene wear rate and osteolysis: critical threshold versus continuous dose-response relationship. J Orthop Res. 2005;23(3):520-525.
96.
WynnAHWildeAH.Long-term follow-up of the Conaxial (Beck-Steffee) total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle. 1992;13(6):303-306.
97.
YangHYWangSHLeeKB. The HINTEGRA total ankle arthroplasty: functional outcomes and implant survivorship in 210 osteoarthritic ankles at a mean of 6.4 years. Bone Joint J. 2019;101-b(6):695-701.
98.
YiPHCrossMBMoricM, et al. Do serologic and synovial tests help diagnose infection in revision hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal bearings or corrosion?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(2):498-505.
99.
YoonHSLeeJChoiWJLeeJW.Periprosthetic osteolysis after total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(1):14-21.
100.
ZhaoHYangYYuGZhouJ.A systematic review of outcome and failure rate of uncemented Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement. Int Orthop. 2011;35(12):1751-1758.
101.
ZmistowskiBDella ValleCBauerTW, et al. Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(2 suppl):77-83.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
