CT-Based Descriptive Classification for Residual Talar Defects Associated With Failed Total Ankle Replacement: Technique Tip

Abstract

Keywords

computed tomography cyst osteolysis total ankle arthroplasty

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

Montgomery

Carlsson

Uncemented STAR total ankle prostheses: three to eight-year follow-up of fifty-one consecutive ankles. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(7):1321-1329.

Bestic

Peterson

DeOrio

et al . Postoperative evaluation of the total ankle arthroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(4):1112-1123.

Brunner

Barg

Knupp

et al . The Scandinavian total ankle replacement: long-term, eleven to fifteen-year, survivorship analysis of the prosthesis in seventy-two consecutive patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(8):711-718.

Daniels

Mayich

Penner

MJ.

Intermediate to long-term outcomes of total ankle replacement with the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement (STAR). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(11):895-903.

Hanna

Haddad

Lazarus

ML.

Evaluation of periprosthetic lucency after total ankle arthroplasty: helical CT versus conventional radiography. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(8):921-926.

Henricson

Carlsson

Survival analysis of the single- and double-coated STAR ankle up to 20 years: long-term follow-up of 324 cases from the Swedish Ankle Registry. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(10):1156-1160.

Jensen

Frokjaer

Gerke

Ludvigsen

Torfing

Evaluation of periprosthetic bone cysts in patients with a Scandinavian total ankle replacement: weight-bearing conventional digital radiographs versus weight-bearing multiplanar reconstructed fluoroscopic imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203(4):863-868.

Kohonen

I, KH

Mattila

Tiusanen

Computed Tomography of Osteolysis Related to Total Ankle Replacement CT scanning: Techniques and Applications. Rijeka, Croatia: Intech; 2011. Available at: https://www.intech.com/books/ct-scanning-techniques-and-applications/computed-tomography-of-osteolysis-related-to-total-ankle-replacement

Kotnis

Pasapula

Anwar

Cooke

Sharp

RJ.

The management of failed ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(8):1039-1047.

10.

Mann

Horton

STAR ankle: long-term results. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(5):S473-S484.

11.

Paprosky

Perona

Lawrence

JM.

Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty: a 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty. 1994;9(1):33-44.

12.

Prissel

Roukis

TS.

Incidence of revision after primary implantation of the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement System. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2013;30(2):237-250.

13.

Roukis

Prissel

MA.

Management of extensive talar osteolysis with Agility total ankle replacement systems using geometric metal-reinforced polymethylmethacrylate cement augmentation. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2014;53(1):108-113.

14.

Roukis

Prissel

MA.

Registry data trends of total ankle replacement use. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;52(6):728-735.

15.

Saltzman

Mann

Ahrens

et al . Prospective controlled trial of STAR total ankle replacement versus ankle fusion: initial results. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30(7):579-596.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.18 MB