Limited access to basic foot care and protective footwear may contribute to diabetic foot complications. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of foot complications, ongoing foot care, and footwear use in diabetic subjects in a remote northern Canadian Aboriginal community.
Methods:
This was a cross-sectional cohort study of 169 diabetic people, including interview, physical examination, and retrospective chart review.
Results:
The mean age of the 169 diabetic individuals in the study was 56 ± 12 years and their duration of diabetes 10 ± 7 years. There were 139 (82%) individuals who had 418 diabetic foot complications (average, 3.0 complications per subject with complications), including toenail pathology, foot and ankle deformities, calluses, impaired pulses, neuropathy, past or present ulcer, amputation, and Charcot arthropathy. Risk classification showed that 69 (41%) individuals were at risk for future ulceration. Fifty-five (33%) individuals had inadequate footwear for their foot risk category, and only 11 (17%) of 66 individuals in the higher risk categories (categories 2 and 3) had suitable footwear. In a 7-year period, only 0.7 screening foot examinations per diabetic subject per year were documented. However, during this period, foot problems accounted for 498 (18%) local emergency room visits, 359 (16%) hospitalization days, 109 (11%) nonemergency transfers, and 4 (6%) emergency transfers to a tertiary care hospital.
Conclusions:
Foot and ankle complications of diabetes in this remote Aboriginal community were common and associated with substantial morbidity. Preventive diabetic foot screening examinations and footwear were inadequate. The results suggest that programs for prevention and early detection of complications are needed, including foot screening, provision of appropriate footwear, and foot care.
ApelqvistJRagnarson-TennvallGPerssonULarssonJ: Diabetic foot ulcers in a multidisciplinary setting. An economic analysis of primary healing and healing with amputation. J. Intern. Med. 235:463–471, 1994.
2.
ArmstrongDGLaveryLAVelaSAQuebedeauxTLFleischliJG:. Choosing a practical screening instrument to identify patients at risk for diabetic foot ulceration. Arch. Intern. Med. 158:289–292, 1998.
3.
BaileyTSYuHMRayfieldEJ: Patterns of foot examination in a diabetes clinic. Am. J. Med. 78:371–374, 1985.
4.
BirkeJASimsDS: Plantar sensory threshold in the ulcerative foot. Lepr. Rev. 57:261–267, 1986.
5.
BoultonAJ: Lowering the risk of neuropathy, foot ulcers and amputations. Diabet. Med. 15(Suppl. 4): S57–S59, 1998.
ChantelauEHaageP: An audit of cushioned diabetic footwear: relation to patient compliance. Diabet. Med. 11:114–116, 1994.
8.
ChantelauEKushnerTSpraulM: How effective is cushioned therapeutic footwear in protecting diabetic feet? A clinical study. Diabet. Med. 7:355–359, 1990.
9.
de Heus-van PuttenMASchaperNCBakkerK: The clinical examination of the diabetic foot in daily practise. Diabet. Med. 13:S55–S57, 1996.
10.
DuffyJCPatoutCAJr: Management of the insensitive foot in diabetes: lessons learned from Hansen's disease. Mil. Med. 155:575–579, 1990.
11.
DussaultRErasmusGChartrandPLAH: Report of the Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. Ottawa, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, 1996.
12.
EdelsonGWArmstrongDGLaveryLACaiccoG: The acutely infected diabetic foot is not adequately evaluated in an inpatient setting. Arch. Intern. Med. 156:2373–2378, 1996.
13.
EdmondsMEBlundellMPMorrisME: Improved survival of the diabetic foot: the role of a specialised foot clinic. Quart. J. Med. 60:763–771, 1986.
14.
EdmondsMEVan AckerKFosterAV: Education and the diabetic foot. Diabet. Med. 13:S61–S64, 1996.
15.
FagliaEFavalesFAldeghiA: Change in major amputation rate in a center dedicated to diabetic foot care during the 1980s: prognostic determinants for major amputation. J. Diab. Complic. 12:96–102, 1998.
16.
FosterAVMSnowdenSGrenfellAWatkinsPJEdmondsME: Reduction of gangrene and amputations in diabetic renal transplant patients: the role of a special foot clinic. Diabet. Med. 12:632–635, 1995.
17.
FrykbergRG: The team approach in diabetic foot management. Adv. Wound Care11:71–77, 1998.
18.
GinHRigalleauVBailletLRabemanantsoaC: Comparison between monofilament, tuning fork and vibration perception tests for screening patients at risk of foot complication. Diabetes Metab. 28(6 Pt. 1):457–461, 2002.
19.
GreenCBlanchardJFYoungTKGriffithJ: The epidemiology of diabetes in the Manitoba-registered First Nation population. Diabetes Care26:1993–1998, 2003.
20.
KnowlesEABoultonAJM: Do people with diabetes wear their prescribed footwear?Diabet. Med. 13:1064–1068, 1996.
21.
KumarSFernandoDJSVevesA: Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments: a simple, effective and inexpensive screening device for identifying diabetic patients at risk of foot ulceration. Diabetes Res. Clin. Prac. 13:63–67, 1991.
22.
LeeJSLuMLeeVS: Lower-extremity amputation. Incidence, risk factors, and mortality in the Oklahoma Indian Diabetes Study. Diabetes42:876–882, 1993.
23.
LitzelmanDKSlemendaCWLangefeldCD: Reduction of lower extremity clinical abnormalities in patients with non-insulin- dependent diabetes mellitus. Ann. Intern. Med. 119:36–41, 1993.
24.
MacaulayACMontourLTAdelsonN: Prevalence of diabetic and atherosclerotic complications among Mohawk Indians of Kahnawake. PQ. CMAJ139:221–224, 1988.
25.
MaloneJMSnyderMAndersonG: Prevention of amputation by diabetic education. Am. J. Surg. 158:520–524, 1989.
26.
MartensPBondRJebamaniL: The health and health care use of registered First Nations people living in Manitoba: a population-based study. Winnipeg, Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, 2002.
27.
MayfieldJAReiberGENelsonRGGreeneT: Do foot examinations reduce the risk of diabetic amputation?J. Fam. Practice49:499–504, 2000.
28.
MayfieldJAReiberGENelsonRGGreeneT: A foot risk classification system to predict diabetic amputation in Pima Indians. Diab. Care19:704–709, 1996.
29.
McNeelyMJBoykoEJAhroniJH: The independent contributions of diabetic neuropathy and vasculopathy in foot ulceration. Diab. Care18:216–219, 1995.
30.
MeltzerSLeiterLDanemanD: 1998 clinical practice guidelines for the management of diabetes in Canada. CMAJ159(8 Suppl.):S1–S29, 1998.
Northern Medical Unit: A look back at 2003. Northern Medical Unit News2(1):1, 2004.
33.
OllendorfDAKotsanosJGWishnerWJ: Potential economic benefits of lower-extremity amputation prevention strategies in diabetes. Diab. Care21:1240–1245, 1998.
34.
PecoraroREReiberGEBurgessEM: Pathways to diabetic limb amputation. Basis for prevention. Diabetes Care13:513–521, 1990.
35.
PerryJEUlbrechtJSDerrJACavanaghPR: The use of running shoes to reduce plantar pressures in patients who have diabetes. J. Bone Joint Surg. 77-A:1819–1828, 1995.
36.
PinzurMSKernan-SchroederDEmanueleNVEmanuelM: Development of a nurse-provided health system strategy for diabetic foot care. Foot Ankle Int. 22:744–746, 2001.
37.
PirartJ: Diabetes mellitus and its degenerative complications: a prospective study of 4,400 patients observed between 1947 and 1973. Diab. Care1:168–188, 1978.
38.
PirartJ: Diabetes mellitus and its degenerative complications: a prospective study of 4,400 patients observed between 1947 and 1973. Part 2. Diabetes Care1:252–263, 1978.
39.
RamseySDNewtonKBloughD: Incidence, outcomes, and cost of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care22:382–387, 1999.
40.
RateRGKnowlerWCMorseHG: Diabetes mellitus in Hopi and Navajo Indians. Diabetes32:894–899, 1983.
41.
ReiberGE: The epidemiology of diabetic foot problems. Diabetes Med. 13(Suppl. 1):S6–S11, 1996.
42.
ReiberGEVileikyteLBoykoEJ: Causal pathways for incident lower-extremity ulcers in patients with diabetes from two settings. Diabetes Care22:157–162, 1999.
43.
Rith-NajarianSJStoluskyTGohdesDM: Identifying diabetic patients at high risk for lower-extremity amputation in a primary health care setting. Diab. Care15:1386–1389, 1992.
44.
Rith-NajarianSJValwaySEGohdesDM: Diabetes in a northern Minnesota Chippewa tribe. Diabetes Care16:266–270, 1993.
45.
RoseGDuerksenFBlanchardJ: Complications of the lower extremities in persons with diabetes presenting to a multidisciplinary foot clinic. Proceedings of the 1998–1999 BSc (Med) Programme, University of Manitoba 141–147, 1999.
46.
SchraerCDMayerAMVogtAM: The Alaska Native diabetes program. Int. J. Circumpolar Health60:487–494, 2001.
47.
SchulzLOLalicataMCarnesDRith-NajarianSJ: Prevalence of diabetes and factors associated with diabetic complications in Oneida Indians. Life Sci. 60:299–306, 1997.
Statistics Canada: Census of Population, May 15, 2001. www12.statcan.ca, accessed May 22, 2004.
50.
SteedDLEdingtonHMoosaHHWebsterMW: Organization and development of a university multidisciplinary wound care clinic. Surgery114:775–779, 1993.
51.
UccioliLFagliaEMonticoneG: Manufactured shoes in the prevention of diabetic foot ulcers. Diab. Care18:1376–1378, 1995.
52.
UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group:Intensive blood- glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet352:837–853, 1998.
53.
WagnerFW: The dysvascular foot: a system for diagnosis and treatment. Foot Ankle2:64–122, 1981.
54.
WunderlichRPArmstrongDGHusainSKLaveryLA: Defining loss of protective sensation in the diabetic foot. Adv. Wound Care11:123–128, 1998.
55.
Wylie-RosettJWalkerEAShamoonH: Assessment of documented foot examinations for patients with diabetes in inner-city primary care clinics. Arch. Fam. Med. 4:46–50, 1995.
56.
YoungMJBreddyJLVevesABoultonAJM: The prediction of diabetic neuropathic foot ulceration using vibration perception thresholds. Diabetes Care17:557–560, 1994.
