This paper aims to analyze the impact of climate change on cotton production and processing. Using the panel data Vector autoregressive (VAR) model on a panel of 48 countries that are both producers and processors of cotton, the results show that Climate variability has a negative impact on cotton production and processing. In fact, 15% of the variation in production is due to variations in rainfall and 30% is due to variations in temperature. In addition, variations in cotton processing are similarly sensitive to climate variability, with 6% and 38% due to temperature and rainfall variations, respectively. At the same time, climate change has a negative impact on shocks to cotton production and processing, although these are more affected by variations in processing, estimated at 6% (12%), than by variations in temperature (rainfall). Moreover, the estimates by region (Africa, Asia, America, Europa) confirm the above-mentioned differential impacts, with the effects of temperature and rainfall variations being more pronounced in Africa and Asia.
AbrigoM. R. M.LoveI. (2016), Panel vector autoregression estimation in stata: A package of programs, The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 16(3), 778–804. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x1601600314
Alonso-BorregoC.ArellanoM. (1999). Symmetrically normalized instrumental-variable estimation using panel data. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 17(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1999.10524795
4.
AltenbuchnerC.VogelS.LarcherM. (2018). Social, economic and environmental impacts of organic cotton production on the livelihood of smallholder farmers in Odisha, India. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 33(4), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174217051700014X
5.
AvomD.MignamissiD., (2017), Why is intra -CEEAC trade so weak?Revue française d'économie, XXXII(3), 136–170.
6.
BachelierB.BalarabéO.BoulakiaS.DemenoisJ.GérardeauxE.GoebelR. (2018). Which ways forward for sustainable cotton production in Africa in the context of climate change? In 77th Plenary meeting of the international cotton advisory Committee (ICA) (pp. 2–6). December 2018, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire. agritrop. cirad.fr/589934/.
7.
BaffesJ. (2010). Markets for cotton by-products: Global trends and implications for African cotton producers. World Bank, 39.
8.
BikaiJ. L.BatoumenM. H.FossouoA., (2018). Determinants of inflation in CEMAC: The role of money, BEAC Working Paper BWP, No 05/16, 30p.
9.
CanovaF.CiccarelliM. (2013). Panel vector autoregressive models: A survey. Working Paper, 31, 205–246.
ChapagainA. K.HoekstraA. Y.SavenijeH. H. G.GautamR. (2006). The water footprint of cotton consumption: An assessment of the impact of worldwide consumption of cotton products on the water resources in the cotton producing countries. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.027
12.
CharfeddineL.KahiaM. (2019). Impact of renewable energy consumption and financial development on CO2 emissions and economic growth in the MENA region: A panel vector autoregressive (pvar) analysis. Renewable Energy, 139, 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.010
Cotton Incorporated. (2009). Summary of life cycle inventory data for cotton (Field to Bale- version 1.1-2 July 2009) (p. 31). Cotton incorporated.
15.
DjaganiK. K.FokM. (2019). Dangers potentiels de l’utilisation des insecticides dans la culture cotonnière au Togo de 1990 à 2010. Cahiers Agricultures, 28(23). https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2019023
16.
DjohyG. L.Boï WossoE.KinzoN. E. (2015). Variabilité climatique et production cotonnière dans la commune de Kandi au Nord Bénin (pp. 325–330). mémoire du XXVIIe colloque de l'Association Internationale de climatologie.
FAO. (2015). Measuring sustainability in cotton farming systems. Towards a guidance frameworkReport (168). FAO.
19.
FerrareziR. S.RodriguezK.SharpD. (2020). How historical trends in Florida all-citrus production correlate with devastating hurricane and freeze events. Weather, 75(3), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/wea.3512
20.
GarciaL. (2015). Impact du changement climatique sur les rendements du mil et de l'arachide au Sénégal : Approche par expérimentation virtuelle (69). Montpellier SupAgro.
21.
GbetibouoG. A.HassanR. M. (2005). Measuring the economic impact of climate change on major South African field crops: A Ricardian approach. Global and Planetary Change, 47(2-4), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2004.10.009
22.
GérardeauxE.SultanB.PalaïO.GuiziouC.OettliP.NaudinK. (2013). Positive effect of climate change on cotton in 2050 by CO2 enrichment and conservation agriculture in Cameroon. Agronomy for Sustainable development, 33(3), 485–495.
23.
HaddelandI.HeinkeJ.BiemansH.WisserD.FlörkeM.HanasakiN.KonzmannM.LudwigF.MasakiY.ScheweJ.StackeT.TesslerZ. D.WadaY., (2013), Global water resources affected by human interventions and climate change, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(9), 3251–3256. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222475110
24.
HansenL. P.SingletonK. J. (1982). Generalized Instrumental Variables Estimation of Nonlinear Rational Expectations Models. Econometrica, 50(5), 1269–1286. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911873
25.
HoekstraA.ChapagainA. (2007), The global component of freshwater demand and supply: An assessment of virtual water flows between nations as a result of trade in agricultural and industrial products. Water International, 33(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060801927812
26.
Holtz-EakinD.NeweyW.RosenH. S. (1988). Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica, 56(6), 1371–1395. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913103
27.
ICA. (2019). World cotton statistics, December 2019. (restricted access). https://www.ica.org
ITC. (2011a). Coton et changement climatique : Impacts et options de réduction et d'adaptation (pp. 1–36). ITC.
30.
ITC. (2011b). Stratégie de développement de la filière coton-textile-confection en Afrique centrale (pp. 1–115). Document de travail, CEEAC.
31.
JansY.Von BlohW.SchaphoffS.MüllerC. (2021). Global cotton production under climate change - implications for yield and water consumption. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 25(4), 2027–2044. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2027-2021
32.
JawadiF.MallickS. K.SousaR. M. (2016). Fiscal and monetary policies in the brics: A panel var approach. Economic Modelling, 58, 535–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.06.001
33.
JederH.KhalifaA. B.MongiS. (2013). Impact des changements climatiques sur l’agriculture dans la plaine de Jeffara au sud-est tunisien. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development (JAEID), 107(2), 229–242.
34.
KnoxJ.HessT.DaccacheA.WheelerT. (2012). Climate change impacts on crop productivity in Africa and South Asia. Environmental Research Letters, 7(3), Article 034032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/3/034032
35.
KuangB.LuX.HanJ.FanX.ZuoJ. (2020). How urbanization influences urban land consumption intensity: Evidence from China. Habitat International, 100, 102103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.20219.102103
36.
Le BarsM. (2020). Évaluation des risques liés à l’utilisation de pesticides en culture cotonnière au Mali. Cahiers Agricultures, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2020005
37.
LeclercC.MwongeraC.CamberlinP.MotronV. (2014). Cropping system dynamics, climate variability, and seed losses among East African smallholder farmers: A retrospective survey. Weather, Climate and Society, 6(3), 354–370. https://doi.org/10.1175/wcas-d-13-00035.1
38.
Le TreutH. (2004). Comment je vois le monde, Evolution climatique : les modeles et leurs limites. In Le TreutH.JancoviciJ. M. (Eds.), Effet de serre : allons-nous changer le climat ? Editions Champs (pp. 1–246). Flammarion.
39.
LinB.ZhuJ., (2017), Energy and carbon intensity in China during the urbanization and industrialization process: A panel var approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168(168), 780–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.013
40.
LobellD. B.SchlenkerW. S.Costa-RobertsJ. (2011). Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science, 333(6042), 616–620. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204531
41.
LoveI.ZicchinoL., (2006), Financial development and dynamic investment behavior: Evidence from panel VAR, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 46(2), 190–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2005.11.007
42.
MekonnenM. M.HoekstraA. Y. (2010). The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. In: Value of water. Main report, research report series No.48. (Volume 1, p. 43). UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education.
43.
MendelsohnR.DinarA. (2003). Climate, water, and agriculture. Land Economics, 79(3), 328–341. https://doi.org/10.2307/3147020
44.
MendelsohnR.NordhausW.ShawD. (1994). The impact of global warming on agriculture: A Ricardian analysis. American Economic Review, 84(4), 753–771.
45.
MpabeB. M. J.EkaneE. C.KabweO. F. (2021). Analysis of the access gap of enterprises to renewable energy between rural and urban areas in Cameroon. Environmental Economics, 12(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.12(1).2021.04
46.
MpabeB. M. J.FofanaM.KabweO. F. (2023). Firm size and pro-environmental behaviour in Cameroon. Environmental Economics, 14(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.14(1).2023.05
47.
MpabeM. J. B. (2021). Climate change, cotton prices and production in Cameroon. The European Journal of Development Research, 34(1), 22–54. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00345-1
48.
NadiruzzamanM.RahmanM.PalU.CroxtonS.RashidM. B.BahadurA.HuqS. (2021). Impact of climate change on cotton production in Bangladesh. Sustainability, 13(2), 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020574
49.
NguyenQ. V.WiedemannS. G.SimmonsA.ClarkeS. J. (2021). The environmental consequences of a change in Australian cotton lint production. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 26(12), 2321–2338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01994-y
50.
OECD & FAO. (2020). OECD and FAO agricultural outlook 2020-2029, Editions OCDE (pp. 233–243). Paris/FAO, Rome. https://doi.org/10.1787/ccc6f09c-fr
OXFAM France. (2020). L'impact de la mode : drame social, sanitaire et environnemental. https://www.oxfamfrance.org
54.
ReddyK. R.HodgesH. F.KimballB. A. (2000). Crop ecosystem response to climatic change: Cotton. In ReddyK. R.HodgesH. F. (Eds.), Climate change and global crop productivity (pp. 161–187). CAB International.
55.
RoodmanD. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 9(1), 86–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x0900900106
SmithP.MartinoD.CaïZ.GwaryD.JanzenH. H.KumarP.McCarlB., et al. (2007). Agriculture. In MetzB.DavidsonO. R.BoschP. R.DaveR.MeyerL. A. (Eds.), Climate change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 497–540). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58.
SoumaréM.HavardM.BachelierB. (2020). Cotton in West and central Africa: From agricultural revolution to agro-ecological transition. Cahiers Agricultures, 29(37). https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2020037
59.
SultanB.RoudierP.QuirionP.AlhassaneA.MullerB.DingkuhnM.CiaisP.GuimberteauM.TraoreS.BaronC. (2013). Assessing climate change impacts on sorghum and millet yields in the Sudanian and Sahelian savannas of West Africa. Environmental Research Letters, 8(014040), 9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014040
60.
TingemM.RivingtonM.CollsJ. (2008). Climate variability and maize production in Cameroon: Simulating the effects of extreme dry and wet years. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 29(3), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9493.2008.00344.x
61.
World Bank (2020). World development indicators, database.
WuH.LiY.HaoY.RenS.ZhangP. (2020). Environmental decentralization, local government competition, and regional green development: Evidence from China. The Science of the Total Environment, 708(1), 135085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135085
64.
ZhangZ.HuangJ.YaoY.PetersG.MacdonaldB.La RosaA. D.WangZ.SchererL. (2023). Environmental impacts of cotton and opportunities for improvement. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 4(10), 703–715. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00476-z
