Environmental Cooperation in Conflict Zones: Riparian Infrastructure at the Armenian

Abstract

Due to historical grievances, Armenia and Turkey experience severe international conflicts and do not maintain diplomatic ties. Yet, as a vestige of the Soviet period, when Armenia was not an independent country, both nations share the Arpacay/Akhuryan Dam, and riparian cooperation exists at the local level. We observed that local cross-border water institutions are authorized to manage the dam and do so via polycentric management principles. We suggest that such a devolved model of governance facilitates this unique cooperation. Furthermore, there is a positive relationship between private management of water resources in such areas and the ability to sustain cooperation. However, so far, the positive impacts of this cooperation on improving international relations have been little, if any. We suggest that what makes cooperation possible in this context also inhibits its expansion to broader peacebuilding. We also suggest that increased localization of management, coincident with improved relations, maximizes cooperation potential.

Keywords

Kura–Araks Arpacay/Akhuryan Dam transboundary water management Armenia Turkey USSR severe international conflicts water cooperation polycentric management devolution

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adeel, Z., & Wirsing, R. (Eds.). (2017). Imagining Industan: Overcoming water insecurity in the Indus basin. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

Agreement. (1927). Protocol on the Beneficial Uses of Boundary Waters. Signed between Turkey and the USSR.

Agreement. (1963). Protocol on the Joint Construction of the Arpacay/Akhuryan Dam. Signed between Turkey and the USSR.

Agreement. (1973). Cooperation Agreement on the Construction of a Dam on the Bordering Arpacay River and the Constitution of a Dam Lake. Signed between Turkey and the USSR.

Agreement. (1990). Protocol Concerning Mainly Technical Cooperation, Riverbed Changes, and Construction of Joint Hydrotechnical Facilities. Signed between Turkey and the USSR.

Agreement. (2009a). Protocol on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations. Signed between Armenia and Turkey.

Agreement. (2009b). Protocol on the Development of Bilateral Relations. Signed between Armenia and Turkey.

Akamani

Wilson

P. I.

(2011) Toward the adaptive governance of transboundary water resources. Conservation Letters 4(6): 409–416. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00188.x.

Alharmoosh

Heaton

Hasbini

P. H.

Oyola-Sepúlveda

Smith

Smither

Wisely

(2014) Water, cooperation and peace: The peacebuilding impact of joint Israeli-Palestinian wastewater projects, Washington, DC: American University.

10.

Ali

S. H.

(2007) Peace parks: Conservation and conflict resolution, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

11.

Ali

S. H.

(2018) A casualty of peace? Lessons on de-militarizing conservation in the Cordillera Del Condor Corridor. In: Lookingbill

Smallwood

(eds) Collateral values of natural capital (Chap. 8), Berlin, Germany: Springer doi:10.2139/ssrn.2951307.

12.

Altingoz

Belinskij

Bréthaut

Ó, A.

Gevinian

Hearns

Wolf

A. T.

(2018) Promoting development in shared river basins: Case studies from international experience, Washington, DC: World Bank Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10986/29449.

13.

Aptsiauri, G. (2015). Georgia and South Ossetia in rare accord. Retrieved from https://iwpr.net/global-voices/georgia-and-south-ossetia-rare-accord.

14.

Biswas

A. K.

(2011) Cooperation or conflict in transboundary water management: Case study of South Asia. Hydrological Sciences Journal 56(4): 662–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2011.572886 .

15.

Blatter

Ingram

(2000) States, markets and beyond: Governance of transboundary water resources. Natural Resources Journal 40: 439–473.

16.

Bodin

Ö.

Crona

B. I.

(2009) The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change 19(3): 366–374. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.002.

17.

Bullock, J., & Darwish, A. (1993). Water wars: Coming conflicts in the Middle East. St. Edmundsbury: London.

18.

Cash

D. W.

Adger

Berkes

Garden

Lebel

Olsson

Young

(2006) Guest editorial, part of a special feature on scale and cross-scale dynamics scale and cross-scale dynamics: Governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society 11(2): 8.

19.

Conca

(2012) Decoupling water and violent conflict. Issues in Science and Technology 29(1): 39–48.

20.

Conca, K., & Dabelko, G. D. (Eds.). (2002). Environmental peacemaking. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

21.

Conca, K., & Weinthal, E. (Eds.). (2018). The Oxford handbook of water politics and policy. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

22.

Wolf, A. T. (2012). Climate change and the institutional resilience of international river basins. Journal of Peace Research, 49(1), 193–209.

23.

Dietz

Ostrom

Stern

P. C.

(2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302(5652): 1907–1912. Retrieved from www.sciencemag.org.

24.

Exchange on Environment, Conflict and Cooperation (2017) Turkey-Armenia: Water-quality challenges. Environment, Conflict, and Cooperation Library and Factbook, Berlin, Germany: Author.

25.

Folke

(2006) Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change 16(3): 253–267. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002.

26.

Folke

Hahn

Olsson

Norberg

(2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30(1): 441–473. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511.

27.

Grey

Sadoff

Connors

(2016) Effective cooperation on transboundary waters, Washington, DC: The World Bank Publications.

28.

Heikkila

Villamayor-Tomas

Garrick

(2018) Bringing polycentric systems into focus for environmental governance. Environmental Policy and Governance 28(4): 207–211. doi:10.1002/eet.1809.

29.

Homer-Dixon, T. F. (1994a). Environmental scarcities and violent conflict: Evidence from cases. International Security, 19(1), 5–40.

30.

Homer-Dixon, T. F. (1994b). Environmental changes as causes of acute conflict. Conflict after the Cold War: Arguments on causes of War and Peace. New York: Macmillan.

31.

Jögerskog, A. (2003). Why states cooperate over shared water: The water negotiations in the Jordan River Basin (Doctoral dissertation, Linköping University Electronic Press).

32.

Hurriyet Daily News. (2014). Eastern Turkish bird sanctuary threatened due to drought. Retrieved from www.hurriyetdailynews.com/eastern-turkish-bird-sanctuary-threatened-due-to-drought-72063.

33.

Khagram

Ali

(2006) Environment and security. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31(1): 395–411. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.134901.

34.

Krampe

(2017) Water for peace? Post-conflict water resource management in Kosovo. Cooperation and Conflict 52(2): 147–165. doi:10.1177/0010836716652428.

35.

Leb

Henshaw

Iqbal

Rehberger Bescos

(2018) Promoting development in shared river basins: Tools for enhancing transboundary basin management, Washington, DC: World Bank Group doi:10.1596/29462.

36.

Lowi

(1995) Water and power: The politics of a scarce resource in the Jordan River basin, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

37.

Ostrom

(1999) Coping with tragedies of the commons. Annual Review of Political Science 2: 493–535. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.493.

38.

Ostrom

(2012) Nested externalities and polycentric institutions: Must we wait for global solutions to climate change before taking actions at other scales? Economic Theory 49(2): 353–369. doi:10.1007/s00199-010-0558-6.

39.

Ostrom

Tiebout

C. M.

Warren

(1961) The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. American Political Science Review 55(4): 831–842. doi:10.1017/S0003055400125973.

40.

Pahl-Wostl, C. (2007). Requirements for adaptive water management. In: C. Pahl-Wostl, P. Kabat, & J. Möltgen (Eds.), Adaptive and integrated water management (pp. 1–22). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-75941-6_1.

41.

Pahl-Wostl

(2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change 19(3): 354–365. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001.

42.

Pahl-Wostl

Conca

Kramer

Maestu

Schmidt

(2013) Missing links in global water governance: A processes-oriented analysis. Ecology and Society 18(2): 33 doi:10.5751/ES-05554-180233.

43.

Ramsar. (2009). Turkey names 13th Ramsar site. Retrieved from https://www.ramsar.org/news/turkey-names-13th-ramsar-site.

44.

Rijke

Brown

Zevenbergen

Ashley

Farrelly

Morison

van Herk

(2012) Fit-for-purpose governance: A framework to make adaptive governance operational. Environmental Science and Policy 22: 73–84. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.06.010.

45.

Sabonis-Helf, T. (2017). The future of hydropower in the country of Georgia. Retrieved from https://www.hydroworld.com/articles/hr/print/volume-36/issue-7/articles/the-future-of-hydropower-in-the-country-of-georgia.html.

46.

Sadoff

C. W.

Grey

(2005) Cooperation on international rivers: A continuum for securing and sharing benefits. Water International 30(4): 420–427. doi:10.1080/02508060508691886.

47.

Schroder

N. J. S.

(2018) The lens of polycentricity: Identifying polycentric governance systems illustrated through examples from the field of water governance. Environmental Policy and Governance 28(4): 236–251.

48.

Sekercioglu, C. (2014). Putting Turkey on the conservation map. Retrieved from https://whitleyaward.org/winners/kuyucuk-lake-kars-turkey/.

49.

Sevastianov, S. V., Laine, J. P., & Kireev, A. A. (Eds.). (2015). Introduction to border studies. Vladivostok, Russia: Far Eastern Federal University.

50.

Soghoian, Y. (2009). Pollution in border reservoir worries Armenia. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/TOKY5P.

51.

Starr, J. R. (1991). Water wars. Foreign Policy Spring Vol. 82, 17–36.

52.

Subramanian

Brown

(2012) Reaching across the waters: Facing the risks of cooperation in international waters, Washington, DC: The World Bank Publications.

53.

Turkish State Meteorological Service. (2018). Extreme maximum, minimum and average temperatures measured in long period (℃) – Cities & holiday resorts | KARS. Retrieved from https://www.mgm.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx?k=undefined&m=KARS.

54.

United Nations Development Programme. (2018). New Nicosia wastewater treatment plant. Retrieved from www.cy.undp.org/content/cyprus/en/home/projects/NWWTP.

55.

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (2009) River basin commissions and other institutions for transboundary water cooperation: Capacity for water cooperation in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia, New York, NY: United Nations Publications.

56.

Vinogradov

(1996) Transboundary water resources in the former Soviet Union: Between conflict and cooperation. Natural Resources Journal 36(2): 393–415.

57.

Water Conflict Chronology. (2018). Pacific Institute. Retrieved from http://www.worldwater.org.

58.

Wolf

A. T.

(1998) Conflict and cooperation along international waterways. Water Policy 1(2): 251–265. doi:10.1016/S1366-7017(98)00019-1.

59.

Wolf

A. T.

(2007) Shared waters: Conflict and cooperation. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32: 3.1–3.29. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.32.041006.101434.

60.

Wolf, A. T., Kramer, A., Carius, A., & Dabelko, G. D. (2005). Managing Water Conflict and Cooperation. In E. Assadourian, L. Brown, A. Carius, R. Cincotta, K. Conca, G. Dabelko, A. T. Wolf (Eds.), State of the World Redefining Global Security (pp. 80–95). Worldwatch Institute.

61.

Wolf

A. T.

Yoffe

S. B.

Giordano

(2003) International waters: Identifying basins at risk. Water Policy 5: 29–60.

Environmental Cooperation in Conflict Zones: Riparian Infrastructure at the Armenian–Turkish Border

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References