Economic and population growth in the U.S.-Mexico border region has had a negative impact on the region’s water resources. Although water-related problems along the border are binational in nature, the presence of interdependence alone might not be sufficient to overcome the considerable obstacles to binational collaboration. This study seeks to explain the presence and absence of binational civil society collaboration to address water-related problems in the U.S.-Mexico border region. To do so, the research compares levels of binational civil society collaboration in the Tijuana-San Diego, Ambos Nogales, Paso del Norte, and Los Dos Laredos areas. The study finds that while interdependence is a powerful concept, domestic political institutions create opportunities to pursue policy concerns through domestic channels. While transnational institutions exist, only the Border 2012 program currently produces binational civil society collaboration. Successful cooperation is dependent on key network actors that can bridge differences across the border.
Alvarez, S. E., Dagnino, E., & Arturo, E. (Eds.). (1998). Cultures of politics, politics of cultures: Re-visioning Latin American social movements. Boulder: Westview.
2.
Bandy, J. (2004). Paradoxes of transnational civil societies under neoliberalism: The coalition for justice in the Maquiladoras. Social Problems, 51(3), 410-431.
3.
Biekart, K. (2004, July 11-14). The reality of sustainability: The survival of civil society organisations in Latin America after the withdrawal of international aid. Paper presented at the International Society for Third Sector Research, Toronto, Canada.
4.
Border Environment Cooperation Commission. (1996). Minutes of the 7th Public Meeting of the Board of Directors 1996. Retrieved September 27, 2005, from www.cocef.org/apartcom/mi180196.htm
5.
Burt, R. S. (1990). Kinds of relations in American discussion networks. In C. Calhoun, M. W. Meyer, & W. R. Scott (Eds.), Structures of power and constraint (pp. 411-451). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Cook, K. S. (1977). Exchange and power in networks of interorganizational relations. Sociological Quarterly, ’, 62-81.
8.
Crawford, S. E. S., & Ostrom, E. (1995). Agrammar of institutions. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 582-600.
9.
Desarrollo Social Municipal. (2003). Directorio de Organismos de la Sociedad Civil [Directory of Civil Society Organizations]. Tijuana, Mexico: H. Ayuntamiento de Tijuana, 2003.
Environmental Protection Agency and Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. (2003). Border 2012: U.S.-environmental program. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency.
12.
Fischer, C. S. (1982). To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Fox, C. F. (1999). The fence and the river: Culture and politics and the U.S.-Mexico border. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
14.
Fox, J. (2002). Lessons from civil society coalitions. In D. Brooks & J. Fox (Eds.), Cross-border dialogues: U.S.-Mexico social movement networking (pp. 341-418). La Jolla, CA: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.
15.
Fundación del Empresariado Chihuahuense A.C. (2000). Directorio de las Organizaciones de la Sociedad Civil de Chihuahua [Directory of Chihuahuan Civil Society Organizations]. Chihuahua, Mexico: Author.
16.
Fundación del Empresariado Sonorense A.C. (2004). Fesac - Nogales: Directorio de las Organizaciones de la Sociedad Civil [FESAC-Nogales: Directory of Civil Society Organizations]. Nogales, Mexico: Author.
17.
Galaskiewicz, J. (1979). Exchange networks and community politics. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18.
Galaskiewicz, J. (1985). Interorganizational relations. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 281-304.
19.
Galaskiewicz, J., & Shatin, D. (1981). Leadership and networking among neighborhood human service organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 434-448.
20.
Gould, R. (1993). Collective action and network structure. American Sociological Review, 58(2), 182-196.
21.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
22.
Groundwater Users Advisory Council. (1996, February 28). Letter to Roy Frauenfelder. Arizona: The Border Environmental Cooperation Commission Library.
23.
Gulati, R., & Gargiulo, M. (1999). Where do interorganizational networks come from?American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1439-1493.
24.
Hansmann, H. (1987). Economic theories of nonprofit organizations. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 27-42). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25.
Ingram, H., Laney, N. K., & Gillilan, D. M. (1995). Divided waters: Bridging the U.S.-Mexico border. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
26.
International Community Foundation. (2003). Survey of Baja California nonprofit organizations. San Diego, CA: Author.
27.
Kay, T. (in press). Labor transnationalism and global governance. The impact of NAFTA on transnational labor relationships in North America. American Journal of Sociology, 11(3).
28.
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
29.
Kelly, M. E. (2002). Cross-border work on the environment: Evolution, successes, problems, and future outlook. In D. Brooks & J. Fox (Eds.), Cross-border dialogues: U.S.-Mexico social movement networking (pp. 133-144). LaJolla, CA: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.
30.
Ketter, R. (1998). Paso Del Norte Air Quality Task Force: A case studyEl Paso, TX: Environmental Defense Fund and Ford Foundation.
31.
Khalid, S. (2004, July 11-14). Donor-NGO relationship in northern Nigeria. Paper presented at the Meeting of the International Society for Third Sector Research, Toronto, Canada.
32.
Lara, F. (1999). Transboundary networks for environmental management in the San Diego-Tijuana border region. In L. Herzog (Ed.), Shared space: Rethinking the U.S.-Mexico border environment (pp. 155-181). La Jolla, CA: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.
33.
Martinez, O. J. (1994). Border people: Life and society in the U.S.-Mexico borderlands. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
34.
Martinez, O. J. (Ed.). (1986). Across boundaries: Transborder interaction in comparative perspective. El Paso: Texas Western Press.
35.
McHugh, R. (2005). Cross-border joint-management tool could set trend: Paso Del Norte Water Task Force fills void. Silver City, NM: International Relations Center.
36.
Michel, S. (2000). Place, power, and water pollution in the Californias: A geographical analysis of water quality politics in the Tijuana-San Diego metro region. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado.
37.
Michel, S. (Ed.). (2003). The U.S.-Mexican border environment: Binational water planning. San Diego, CA: San Diego State University Press.
38.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
40.
Parsons Engineering. (2002). Sistema de agua potable de Nuevo Laredo, Tamaulipas: Informe de diagnostico, modelaje, y expansion [Water system diagnosis, modeling and expansion report of Nuevo Lardo, Tamaulipas]. Prepared para United States Section, International Boundary and Water Commission.
41.
Schmandt, J., Stoop, C., Ward, G., & Rhodes, L. (1999). Navigating the waters of the Paso Del Norte: A people’s guide. Austin, TX: Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs.
42.
Staudt, K., & Coronado, I. (2002). Fronteras no mas: Toward social justice at the U.S.-Mexico border. New York: Palgrave Macmillian.
43.
Tarrow, S. (2004). Beyond globalization: Why creating transnational social movements is so hard and when it is most likely to happen [Global Solidarity Dialogue, downloaded October 21 2004]. Available from www.antenna.nl/%7Ewaterman/tarrow.html
44.
Thorup, C. L. (1991). The politics of free trade and the dynamics of cross-border coalitions in U.S.-Mexico relations. Columbia Journal of World Business, 26(2), 12-26.
45.
Varady, R., & Mack, M. (1995). Transboundary water resources and public health. Journal of Environmental Health, 57(8), 8-14.
46.
Vasquez-Castillo, M. T. (2001). Mesico-US bilateral planning: Institutions, planners and communities. European Planning Studies, 9(5), 649-662.
47.
Weisbrod, B. (1988). The nonprofit economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
