A large scholarship surrounds the relationship between trade and the environment, with much of it centering on whether trade produces a race to the bottom or a race to the top in the environments of developing countries. While the effects of trade on key pollutants and on specific environmental policies have been widely attended to, scholars have not yet considered if and how trade impacts developing nations’ environmental performance, broadly speaking. This is a critical matter, as the effects of trade on the environment can only be appreciated fully through holistic assessment of the environment and environmental protection. The study that follows helps to fill this void through analysis of an all-inclusive measure of environmental performance that encompasses indicators of policy and practice. Findings demonstrate that exporting to the United States and the European Union improves environmental performance in developing countries; however, no such effect accompanies trade with other countries.
AcharyaA. (2009) Whose ideas matter? Agency and power in Asian regionalism, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
2.
AchenC. H. (2005) Let’s put garbage-can regressions and garbage-can probits where they belong. Conflict Management and Peace Science22(4): 327–339.
3.
AkbostanciE.TuncG. I.Turut-AsikS. (2007) Pollution haven hypothesis and the role of dirty industries in Turkey’s exports. Environment and Development Economics12(2): 297–322.
ArimuraT. H.DarnallN.GanguliR.KatayamaH. (2016) The effect of ISO 14001 on environmental performance: Resolving equivocal findings. Journal of Environmental Management166(15): 556–566.
6.
AykutD.GoldsteinA.United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2007) Developing country multinationals: South-South investment comes of age. Industrial development for the 21st century: Sustainable development perspectives, New York, NY: United Nations Publications, pp. 85–116.
BastiaensI.PostnikovE. (2017) Greening up: The effects of environmental standards in EU and US trade agreements. Environmental Politics26(5): 847–869.
9.
BergerA.BrandiC.BruhnD.ChiM. (2017) Towards “Greening” trade? Tracking environmental protections in the preferential trade agreements of emerging markets (Discussion Paper 2/2017), Bonn, Germany: German Development Institute.
10.
BerlinerD.PrakashA. (2013) Signaling environmental stewardship in the shadow of weak governance: The global diffusion of ISO 14001. Law and Society Review47(2): 345–373.
11.
BinderS.NeumayerE. (2005) Environmental pressure group strength and air pollution: An empirical analysis. Ecological Economics55(4): 527–538.
12.
BlancI.FriotD.MargniM.JollietO. (2008) Towards a new index for environmental sustainability based on a DALY weighting approach. Sustainable Development16(4): 251–260.
13.
BuitenzorgyM.MolA. P. J. (2011) Does democracy lead to a better environment? Deforestation and the democratic transition peak. Environmental and Resource Economics48(1): 59–70.
14.
BuschP.JörgensH. (2005) The international sources of policy convergence: Explaining the spread of environmental policy innovations. Journal of European Public Policy12(5): 1–25.
15.
CaoX.GreenhillB.PrakashA. (2013) Where is the tipping point? Bilateral trade and the diffusion of human rights. British Journal of Political Science43(1): 133–156.
16.
ColeM. A. (2004) Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: Examining the linkages. Ecological Economics48(1): 71–81.
17.
CopelandB. R.TaylorM. S. (1994) North-South trade and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics109(3): 755–787.
18.
CopelandB. R.TaylorM. S. (2004) Trade, growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic Literature42(1): 7–71.
19.
CurkovicS.SroufeR. (2011) Using ISO 14001 to promote a sustainable supply chain strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment20(2): 71–93.
20.
DasJ.DiRienzoC. E. (2010) Is ethnic diversity good for the environment? A cross-country analysis. The Journal of Environment & Development19(1): 91–113.
21.
DreznerD. (2001) Globalization and policy convergence. International Studies Review3(1): 53–78.
22.
DulalH. B.FoaR.KnowlesS. (2011) Social capital and cross-country environmental performance. The Journal of Environment & Development20(2): 121–144.
EstyD. C.LevyM.SrebotnjakT.de SherbininA. (2005) 2005 Environmental sustainability index: Benchmarking national environmental stewardship, New Haven, CT: Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy.
25.
EstyD. C.PorterM. E. (2005) National environmental performance: An empirical analysis of policy results and determinants. Environment and Development Economics10(4): 391–434.
26.
FiorinoD. J. (2011) Explaining national environmental performance: Approaches, evidence, and implications. Policy Sciences44(4): 367–389.
FrankelJ. A.RoseA. K. (2005) Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. The Review of Economics and Statistics87(1): 85–91.
29.
GreenJ. (2010) Private standards in the climate regime: The greenhouse gas protocol. Business and Politics12(3): 1–37.
30.
GreenhillB.MosleyL.PrakashA. (2009) Trade-based diffusion of labor rights: A panel study, 1986–2002. American Political Science Review103(04): 669–690.
31.
GrossmanG. M.KruegerA. B. (1993) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. In: GarberP. M. (ed.) The Mexico-US free trade agreement, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 13–56.
32.
HammondA.AdriaanseA.RodenburgE.BryantD.WoodwardR. (1995) Environmental indicators: A systematic approach to measuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in the context of sustainable development, Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
33.
HeadK.MayerT. (2013) Gravity equations: Toolkit, cookbook, workhorse. In: GopinathG.HelpmanE.RogoffK. (eds) Handbook of international economicsVol. 4, Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 131–195.
34.
HeydonK.WoolcockS. (2014) Comparing international trade policies: The EU, United States, EFTA and Japanese PTA strategies, Brussels, Belgium: Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union Policy Department.
35.
HolzingerK.KnillC.SommererT. (2008) Environmental policy convergence: The impact of international harmonization, transnational communication, and regulatory competition. International Organization62(4): 553–587.
36.
HolzingerK.SommererT. (2011) ‘Race to the bottom’ or ‘race to the top’? Environmental competition in Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies42(2): 315–339.
37.
HsuA.EmersonJ.LevyM.de SherbininA.JohnsonL.MalikO.JaitehM. (2016) 2016 Environmental performance index, New Haven, CT: Yale University. Retrieved from www.epi.yale.edu.
38.
International Monetary Fund (2014) Direction of trade statistics, Washington, DC: Author.
39.
JahnD. (2016) The politics of environmental performance: Institutions and preferences in industrialized countries, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
40.
JörgensH. (2004) Governance by diffusion: Implementing global norms through cross-national imitation and learning. In: LaffertyW. M. (ed.) Governance for sustainable development: Adapting form to function, Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar, pp. 246–283.
41.
JugJ.MirzaD. (2005) Environmental regulations in gravity equations: Evidence from Europe. The World Economy28(11): 1591–1615.
42.
KanemotoK.MoranD.LanzenM.GeschkeA. (2014) International trade undermines national emission reduction targets: New evidence from air pollution. Global Environmental Change24(1): 52–59.
43.
KohK. (2012) The discourse of environmental security in the ASEAN context. In: JessupB.RubensteinK. (eds) Environmental discourses in public and international law, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 218–237.
44.
KoniskyD. (2008) Regulator attitudes and the environmental race to the bottom. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory18(2): 321–344.
45.
LandriganP. J.FullerR. (2016) Pollution, health and development: The need for a new paradigm. Review of Environmental Health31(1): 121–124.
46.
LiQ.ReuvenyR. (2006) Democracy and environmental degradation. International Studies Quarterly50(4): 935–956.
47.
Marshall, M. G., & Jaggers, K. (2002). Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800-2002. Version p4v2002e [Computer File]. College Park: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland. Retrieved from http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/polity/index.htm.
48.
MidlarskyM. I. (1998) Democracy and the environment: An empirical assessment. Journal of Peace Research35(3): 341–361.
49.
MuradianR.Martinez-AlierJ. (2001) Trade and the environment: From a ‘Southern’ perspective. Ecological Economics36(2): 281–297.
50.
ÖzdenÇ.ReinhardtE. (2005) Unilateral preference programs: The evidence. In: HoekmanB. M.EvenettS. J. (eds) Economic development and multilateral trade cooperation, Washington, DC: The World Bank, pp. 189–212.
51.
PerkinsR.NeumayerE. (2012) Does the ‘California effect’ operate across borders? Trading- and investing-up in automobile emission standards. Journal of European Public Policy19(2): 217–237.
52.
PorterG. (1999) Trade competition and pollution standards: “Race to the bottom” or “stuck at the bottom”. The Journal of Environment & Development8(2): 133–151.
53.
PostnikovE. (2014) The design of social standards in EU and US preferential trade agreements. In: DeeseD. A. (ed.) Handbook of the international political economy of trade, Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 531–549.
54.
PrakashA.PotoskiM. (2006) Racing to the bottom? Trade, environmental governance, and ISO 14001. American Journal of Political Science50(2): 350–364.
55.
PrakashA.PotoskiM. (2017) The EU effect: Does trade with the EU reduce CO2 emissions in the developing world?Environmental Politics26(1): 27–48.
56.
SaikawaE. (2013) Policy diffusion of emission standards: Is there a race to the top?World Politics65(01): 1–33.
57.
ScruggsL. (2003) Sustaining abundance: Environmental performance in industrial democracies, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
58.
SheldonI. (2006) Trade and environmental policy: A race to the bottom?Journal of Agricultural Economics57(3): 365–392.
59.
SimmonsB.ElkinsZ. (2004) The globalization of liberalization. American Political Science Review98(1): 171–189.
60.
SonnenfeldD.MolA. P. J. (2006) Environmental reform in Asia: Comparisons, challenges, next steps. Journal of Environment & Development15(2): 112–137.
61.
SternD. I. (2004) The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development32(8): 1419–1439.
62.
VogelD. (1995) Trading up, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63.
WheelerD. (2001) Racing to the bottom? Foreign investment and air pollution in developing countries. Journal of Environment & Development10(3): 225–245.
64.
World Bank (2017) World Development Indicators, Washington, DC: Author.
65.
YanaiA. (2014) Environmental provisions in Japanese regional trade agreements with developing countries (Discussion Paper), Chiba, Japan: Institute of Developing Economies.
