Toward a New Scenario in Agricultural Sustainability Certification? The Response of the Indonesian National Government to Private Certification

Abstract

This article discusses a new development in the relationships between private sustainability standards and governments, one in which Southern governments reclaim the authority from mainly Northern-based businesses and nongovernmental organizations. It examines how the Indonesian government, a forerunner in this field, responds to the private certification of palm oil. The results of this in-depth study are compared with similar trends in the coffee and cocoa sectors in Indonesia. The article observes that a change takes place from a nonresponsive stance, a modest involvement in terms of sustaining the implementation of private certifications, to an active development of alternative public national standards and certifications. The article defines some factors that facilitate the development of Southern public standards as an addition or alternative to private regulations and reviews the implications for the future of private standards and certification.

Keywords

sustainability standards private certification sustainable agricultural commodities roles of governments the Indonesian government

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anggraini

Grundmann

(2013) Transactions in the supply chain of oil palm fruits and their relevance for land conversion in smallholdings in Indonesia. The Journal of Environment & Development 22(4): 391–410.

Auld

Renckens

Cashore

(2015) Transnational private governance between the logics of empowerment and control. Regulation & Governance 9: 108–124.

Badrun

(2013) Oil palm-based agriculture: From waste towards blue economy, Jakarta, Indonesia: In collaboration with GAPKI.

Bangun

(2010) Memoirs “ambassador” of the Indonesian oil palm, Jakarta, Indonesia: Kompas Publishing.

Bartley, T. (May, 2010). Certification as a mode of social regulation (Jerusalem Papers in Regulation and Governance, Working Paper No. 8). Jerusalem Forum on Regulation & Governance. The Hebrew University Mount Scopus Jerusalem, 91905, Israel. ISSN: 2079–5882.

Bartley

(2014) Transnational governance and the re-centered state: Sustainability or legality? Regulation & Governance 8: 93–109.

Birner

Resnick

(2010) The political economy of policies for smallholder agriculture. World Development 38(10): 1442–1452.

Bitzer, V. (2012). Partnering for change in chains: The capacity of partnerships to promote sustainable change in global agrifood chains. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 15 (Special Issue B), pp. 13–38.

Bitzer

Glasbergen

(2015) Business–NGO partnerships in global value chains: Part of the solution or part of the problem of sustainable change? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 12: 35–40.

10.

Brandi

Cabani

Hosang

Schirmbeck

Westermann

Wiese

(2015) Sustainability standards for palm oil: Challenges for smallholder certification under the RSPO. Journal of Environment & Development 24(3): 292–314.

11.

Bush

S. R.

Oosterveer

Mol

A. P. J.

Kusumawati

Belton

Hall

T. T. T.

(2013) Certify sustainable aquaculture? Science 341(6150): 1067–1068.

12.

Caroko

Komarudin

Obidzinski

Gunarso

(2011) Policy and institutional framworks from the development of palm-oil based biodiesel in Indonesia, Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.

13.

Cashore

Auld

Newsom

(2004) Governing through markets: Forest certification and the emergence of non-state authority, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

14.

Central Bureau of Statistics. (2014). Palm oil exports by major destination country 2008–2014. Retrieved from http://www.bps.go.id/linkTabelStatis/view/id/1026.

15.

Directorate General of Estate Crops. (2011). A strong determination to implement ISPO announced on the celebration of 100 years oil palm industry. Retrieved from http://ditjenbun.pertanian.go.id/tanhun/berita-173-tekad-untuk-menerapkan-ispo-telah-dicanangkan-pada-peringatan-semarak-100-tahun-industri-kelapa–saw.html.

16.

Directorate General of Estate Crops. (2013). The importance of ISCOffee (Indonesian sustainable coffee). Retrieved from http://ditjenbun.pertanian.go.id/pascapanen/berita-214-pentingnya-iscoffee-indonesian-sustainable-coffee.html.

17.

Douma, M., & van Wijk, J. (2012). ASC certified shrimp: Can extensive shrimp farming benefit? A case study of Indonesia (Working Paper No. 2012/46). Maastricht, the Netherlands: Maastricht School of Management.

18.

Fuchs

Kalfagianni

Havinga

(2011) Actors in private food governance: The legitimacy of retail standards and multistakeholder initiatives with civil society participation. Agriculture and Human Values 28(3): 353–367.

19.

GAPKI. (2013). About GAPKI. Retrieved from the Indonesian Palm Oil Association website: http://www.gapki.or.id/Page/About.

20.

Giessen, L., Burns, S., Sahide, A., & Wibowo, A. (n.d.). From private governance to public government in forest and agricultural certification: The key role of state bureaucracies for private governance in Argentina and Indonesia. Retrieved from http://www.icpublicpolicy.org/conference/file/reponse/1433250564.pdf.

21.

Gillespie

(2012) Participation and power in Indonesian oil palm plantations. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 53(3): 254–271.

22.

Giovannucci

Von Hagen

Wozniak

(2013) Corporate social responsibility and the role of voluntary sustainability standards. In: Schmitz-Hoffmann

(eds) Voluntary standards systems—A contribution to sustainable development, Berlin, Germany: Springer Publishing, pp. 359–384.

23.

Glasbergen

(2010) Global action networks: Agents for collective action. Global Environmental Change 20: 130–141.

24.

Glasbergen

(2011) Mechanisms of private meta-governance. An analysis of global private governance for sustainable development. International Journal of Strategic Business Alliances 2(3): 189–206.

25.

Glasbergen

(2013) Legitimation of certifying partnerships in the global market place. Environmental Policy and Governance 23(6): 354–367.

26.

Glasbergen

Schouten

(2015) Transformative capacities of global private sustainability standards: A reflection on scenarios in the field of agricultural commodities. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship 58: 85–101.

27.

Gulbrandsen

L. H.

(2012) Dynamic governance interactions: Evolutionary effects of state responses to non-state certification programs. Regulation & Governance 8(1): 74–92.

28.

T. T. T.

Bush

S. R.

Mol

A. P. J.

van Dijk

(2012) Organic coasts? Regulatory challenges of certifying integrated shrimp-mangrove production systems in Vietnam. Journal of Rural Studies 28(4): 631–639.

29.

Hatanaka

(2010) Certification, partnership, and morality in an organic shrimp network: Rethinking transnational alternative agrifood networks. World Development 38(5): 706–716.

30.

Henson

Humphrey

(2010) Understanding the complexities of private standards in global agri-food chains as they impact developing countries. The Journal of Development Studies 46(9): 1628–1646.

31.

Hospes

(2014) Marking the success or end of global multi-stakeholder governance? The rise of national sustainability standards in Indonesia and Brazil for palm oil and soy. Agriculture and Human Values 31(3): 425–437.

32.

Hospes, O., & Kentin, A. (2012, July). Sustainability governance and scale framing: The case of palm oil. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Conference on Multi-organisational Partnerships, Alliances and Network, 2–4 July 2012, Wageningen University, the Netherlands.

33.

ICO. (2014). April trade statistics. International coffee organization (ICO). Retrieved from http://www.ico.org/trade_statistics.asp?section=Statistics.

34.

ISPO. (2013). About ISPO. Indonesian sustainable palm oil (ISPO). Retrieved from http://www.ispo-org.or.id/.

35.

International Trade Centre (2011) The interplay of public and private standards: Literature review series on the impacts of private standards Vol. Part III, Geneva, Switzerland: Author.

36.

Kalfagianni

Pattberg

(2013a) Global fisheries governance beyond the State: Unraveling the effectiveness of the Marine stewardship council. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 3(2): 184–193.

37.

Kalfagianni

Pattberg

(2013b) Fishing in muddy waters: Exploring the conditions for effective governance of fisheries and aquaculture. Marine Policy 38: 124–132.

38.

Karns

M. P.

Mingst

K. A.

(2010) International organizations: The politic and process of global governance, 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

39.

KPMG, Advisory

N. V.

(2012) Certification and biodiversity: Exploring improvements in the effectiveness of certification schemes on biodiversity, Amsterdam, the Netherlands: KPMG Climate Change and Sustainability Services.

40.

Lestari, D. (2010). Palm oil entrepreneurs criticized the role of RSPO. Retrieved from http://www.bumn.go.id/ptpn4/berita/642/Pebisnis.Sawit.Gugat.Peran.RSPO.

41.

Martinez

M. G.

Poole

(2004) The development of private fresh produce safety standards: Implications for developing Mediterranean exporting countries. Food Policy 29(3): 229–255.

42.

Marx, A., Maertens, M., Swinnen, J., & Wouters, J. (Eds.). (2012). Private standards and global governance. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.

43.

Mayer

Gereffi

(2010) Regulation and economic globalization: Prospects and limits of private governance. Business and Politics 12(3): 11.

44.

McCarthy

J. F.

(2010) Processes of inclusion and adverse incorporation: Oil palm and agrarian change in Sumatra, Indonesia. The Journal of Peasant Studies 37(4): 821–850.

45.

McCarthy

J. F.

Gillespie

Zen

(2012) Swimming upstream: Local Indonesian production networks in “globalized” palm oil production. World Development 40(3): 555–569.

46.

Media Perkebunan. (2013, March 25). Standardization as a proof of identity. Retrieved from http://mediaperkebunan.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=421:standarisasi-bukti-jatidiri&catid=17:berita.

47.

Neilson

(2008) Global private regulation and value-chain restructuring in Indonesian smallholder coffee systems. World Development 36(9): 1607–1622.

48.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2012) OECD Review of agricultural policies: Indonesia, Paris, France: Author.

49.

Overdevest

Zeilin

(2014) Assembling an experimentalist regime: Transnational governance interactions in the forest sector. Regulation & Governance 8: 22–48.

50.

Pesqueira

Glasbergen

(2013) Playing the politics of scale: Oxfam’s intervention in the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil. Geoforum 45: 296–304.

51.

Pichler

(2013) “People, planet & profit”: Consumer-oriented hegemony and power relations in palm oil and agrofuel certification. Journal of Environment & Development 22(4): 370–390.

52.

Ponte

Cheyns

(2013) Voluntary standards, expert knowledge and the governance of sustainability networks. Global Networks 13: 459–477.

53.

Reinecke

Manning

von Hagen

(2012) The emergence of a standards market: Multiplicity of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry. Organization Studies 33(5–6): 791–814.

54.

Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil. (2007). RSPO-principles and criteria for sustainable palm oil production. Retrieved from Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil website: http://www.rspo.org/resources/key-documents/certification/rspo-principles-and-criteria..

55.

Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil. (2008). National interpretation of RSPO principles and criteria for sustainable palm oil production, Republic of Indonesia. Retrieved from http://www.rspo.org/file/PDF/RSPO_national%20interpretation/ghana/indonesia/NI_INANIWG_Final_English_May2008_ver01.pdf.

56.

Sahide

M. A.

Nurrochmat

D. R.

Giessen

(2015) The regime complex for tropical rainforest transformation: Analysing the relevance of multiple global and regional land use regimes in Indonesia. Land Use Policy 47: 408–425.

57.

Sawit Watch. (2013). Petition of guarantee fairness, transparency and balance in the RSPO grievance mechanism. Retrieved from http://sawitwatch.or.id/2013/11/1445/.

58.

Schouten

Bitzer

(2015) The emergence of Southern standards in agricultural value chains: A new trend in sustainability governance? Ecological Economics 120: 175–184.

59.

Schouten

Glasbergen

(2011) Creating legitimacy in global private governance: The case of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil. Ecological Economics 70(11): 1891–1899.

60.

Schouten

Leroy

Glasbergen

(2012) On the deliberative capacity of private multi-stakeholder governance: The roundtables on responsible soy and sustainable palm oil. Ecological Economics 83: 42–50.

61.

Steering Committee of the State-of-Knowledge Assessment of Standards and Certification (2012) Towards sustainability: The roles and limitations of certification, Washington, DC: Resolve, Inc.

62.

Subagyo. (2014, March 20). ISPO certified palm land reaches 378 thousand hectares. Antaranews. Retrieved from http://www.antaranews.com/berita/425158/lahan-sawit-tersertifikasi-ispo-378-ribu-ha.

63.

Sudarsono. (2014, Maret 3). Palm oil companies will get the incentive. Sindonews. Retrieved from http://ekbis.sindonews.com/read/840614/34/perusahaan-sawit-akan-dapat-insentif-1393818001.

64.

Suharto, R. (2010, December 2). Indonesia needs ISPO. The Jakarta Post. Retrieved from http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2010/12/02/why-indonesia-needs-ispo.html.

65.

Todaro

M. P.

Smith

S. C.

(2003) Economic development, 8th ed. Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited.

66.

Trade Standards Practitioners Network. (2011). Food-related voluntary sustainability standards: A strategy guide for policy makers [Draft for discussion]. Retrieved from www.tradestandards.org.

67.

UNDP. (2013, November 1). ISPO and RSPO enter into strategic co-operation [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.id.undp.org/content/indonesia/en/home/presscenter/pressreleases/2013/11/01/ispo-and-rspo-enter-into-strategic-co-operation-.html.

68.

Van der Geest

Unno

(2012) A new extraterritoriality? Aquaculture certification, sovereignty, and empire. Political Geography 31(6): 358–367.

69.

van Dijk

M. P.

Trienekens

European Association of Development Research, Training Institutes (2012) Global value chains: Linking local producers from developing countries to international markets, Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Amsterdam University PressRetrieved from http://site.ebrary.com/id/10537748.

70.

Vellema

Ton

de Roo

van Wijk

(2013) Value chains, partnerships and development: Using case studies to refine programme theories. Evaluation 19(3): 304–320.

71.

Vellema

van Wijk

(2015) Partnerships intervening in global food chains: The emergence of co-creation in standard-setting and certification. Journal of Cleaner Production 107: 105–113. .

72.

Vermeulen

W. J. V.

Kok

M. T. J.

(2012) Government interventions in sustainable supply chain governance: Experience in Dutch front-running cases. Ecological Economics 83: 183–196.

73.

Wahyudi, T., & Jati, M. (September, 2012). Challenges of sustainable coffee certification in Indonesia. Paper presented at the Seminar on the Economic, Social and Environmental Impact of Certification on the Coffee Supply Chain: International Coffee Council 109th Session, London, England. Retrieved from http://www.ico.org/event_pdfs/seminar-certification/certification-iccri-paper.pdf.

74.

World Growth (2011) The economic benefit of palm oil to Indonesia, Arlington, VA: Author.

75.

Zadek

(2010) Emerging nations and sustainability. Chimera or leadership. Notizie di Politeia 26(89): 153–167.