This article develops a framework to evaluate net benefits from mining and utilizes it to assess the Marlin mine in Guatemala. The framework integrates “weak” and “strong” sustainability principles. Under weak sustainability, a net gain in human welfare can substitute for the loss of nonrenewable resources. Under strong sustainability, nature’s life-support systems are not substitutable. We define “net benefits” as the joint generation of net gains to human welfare, defined as local acceptance and high economic benefits, and low risks to the resilience of environmental life-support systems, especially water, evidenced by best practice management standards. We find little evidence that the Marlin mine meets either weak or strong sustainability criteria: there is strong local resistance to the mine and economic benefits are low, while environmental risk is high, especially in terms of potential long-term contamination of life-supporting ground and surface water.
AmezagaJ. M.RottingT. S.YoungerP.NairnR. W.NolesA.OyarzunR.QuintanillaJ. (2011). A rich vein? Mining and the pursuit of sustainability. Environmental Science and Technology, 45, 21-26.
2.
Annual Monitoring Report (AMR) (2006-2009). Environmental and social performance annual monitoring report, Montana Exploradora for Goldcorp. Retrieved from www.goldcorp.com
3.
ArocaP. (2000). Diversification and development in local economies based on the mining sector: The case of Chilean II Region. Paper presented at the UNCTAD regional workshop for mineral economies in Africa, Cape Town, South Africa. Retrieved from http://www.natural-resources.org/society/
4.
Asociacion de Investigacion y Estudios Sociales (ASIES) (2010, May7). Estudio Costo Beneficio de la Mina Marlin en San Marcos, Guatemala [Costs and Benefits of the Marlin Mine in San Marcos, Guatemala]. San Marcos, Guatemala: Author.
5.
AzapagicA. (2004). Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 12, 639-662.
BlignautJ. N.HassanR. M. (2002). Assessment of the performance and sustainability of mining sub-soil assets for economic development in South Africa. Ecological Economics, 40(1), 89-101.
10.
Central American Institute for Fiscal Studies and Center for Economic and Social Rights (ICEFI & CESR) (2009). Rights or privileges? Fiscal commitments to the rights to health, education and food in Guatemala. New York, NY: Author.
11.
Centro de Investigaciones Economicas Nacionales (CIEN). (2009, September24). La Mineria en Guatemala: Una Opportunidad para el Desarrollo [Mining in Guatemala: An Opportunity for Development]. Guatemala City, Guatemala: Author.
12.
China Mining (2010). Zambia: IMF urges Zambia to up mine taxes to fight poverty. Retrieved from Chinamining.org
13.
ClementsK. W.YeQ. (1995). A new input-output table for Western Australia. Nedlands: Economic Research Centre, The University of Western Australia.
14.
Climate Change Team (Environment Department, World Bank) and Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (2011, April). Guatemala: Vulnerability, risk reduction, and adaptation to climate change. Washington, DC, World Bank.
15.
Comision Pastoral Paz y Ecologia (COPAE). (2009, July). Second annual report on the monitoring and analysis of the water quality, San Marcos. San Marcos, Guatemala: Author.
16.
Compliance Advisor Ombudsman(CAO). (2005, September7). Assessment of a complaint submitted to CAO in relation to the Marlin Mining Project in Guatemala. Washington, DC: International Finance Corporation.
17.
DasguptaP.HealM. G. (1974). The optimal depletion of exhaustible resources. Review of Economic Studies, 41, 3-28.
Economic Commission on Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2010). Economics of climate change in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: United Nations.
EkinsP.SimonS.DeutschL.FolkeC.DeGrootR. (2003), A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability. Ecological Economics, 44, 165-185.
22.
E-Tech International (2010, August). Evaluation of predicted and actual water quality conditions at the Marlin Mine. Guatemala City, Guatemala: Author.
23.
Financial Times (2011, June11). “Resource nationalism” returns to commodities.
24.
GallagherK.ZarskyL. (2007). Enclave economy: Foreign investment and sustainable development in Mexico’s Silicon Valley. Cambridge: MIT Press.
25.
Goldcorp. (2009). Goldcorp’s Marlin mine receives International Cyanide Code certification. Retrieved from http://www.goldcorp.com/news/
26.
Goldcorp. (2010). Annual report 2010 and 2009. Retrieved from www.goldcorp.com
GoldVal. (n.d.). GoldVal online information service. Retrieved from http://www.GoldVal.com.
31.
GoodlandR. (2012, September17). Guatemala’s Marlin gold mine: Suggestions to rectify its most serious errors. London, UK: Business and Human Rights Resource Center.
32.
HartwickJ. M. (1977). Intergenerational equity and the investing of rents of exhaustible resources. American Economic Review, 67, 972-974.
33.
HowellC.ChristophersenD. (2009, April). Three-phase mining effluent treatment plant to meet stringent standards, Engineering and Mining Journal.
KP Consulting (2010). Environmental review for the Human Rights Impact Assessment-Marlin Mine Guatemala. Burlington, Ontario, Canada: Author.
41.
KumahL. (2006). Sustainability and gold mining in the developing world. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 315-323.
42.
KuyekJ. (2008). The need to shift Canadian tax incentives to reduce the impact of the mineral industry on the environment and local communities. In ChalifourN.. (Eds). Critical issues in environmental taxation: International and comparative perspectives, Volume 5 (pp. 481-498). New York, NY: Oxford University Press
43.
LaurenceD.C. (2011). Establishing a sustainable mining operation—An Overview. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19, 278-284.
44.
LockeP.CliftonC.WestraS. (2011, April21). Extreme weather events and the mining industry. Engineering and Mining Journal.
45.
MarkyandaA. (2001). The valuation of health impacts in developing countries. In SeroaR.da Motta (Ed.), Environmental economics and policymaking in developing countries, current issues (pp. 82-117). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
46.
Mining Watch (2010, May24). OAS Human Rights Commission urges suspension of mining activity at Goldcorp's Marlin Mine in Guatemala. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Author.
47.
Mining Weekly (2010, November5). Mining companies encouraged to register for Royalty Act. Johannesburg: South Africa.
48.
MoranR. (2004, February). New country, same story: Review of the Glamis Gold Marlin Project EIA, Guatemala. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Mining Watch.
49.
NeumayerE. (2007). Weak and strong sustainability in the SEEA: Concepts and measurement. Ecological Economics, 61, 617-626.
50.
NeumayerE. (2010). Weak versus strong sustainability, third edition. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), African Development Bank, United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA), United Nations Programme Development (2011). African Economic Outlook 2011. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
53.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2009). Latin American economic outlook 2009. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/dev/
54.
PearceD. W.TurnerR. K. (1990). Economics of natural resources and the environment. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
55.
PortilloE. (2011, April18). Guatemala will boost mining and oil industries. Latin Daily Financial News.
56.
RobertsonA. (2009, April21). Dam Inspection— November 2009, Tailings dam review board report no. 9, Marlin Project, Guatemala. Vancouver, British Columbia: Canada: Roberston Geoconsultants Inc. Retrieved from www.goldcorp.com
57.
SolowR. M. (1974). Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. Review of Economic Studies Symposium, 41, 29-46.
58.
StanleyL. (2011). Goldcorp’s Marlin: Contracts, royalties and super-profits Unpublished manuscript.
59.
StetsonG. (2012). Oil politics and indigenous resistance in the Peruvian Amazon: The rhetoric of modernity against the reality of coloniality. Journal of Environment and Development, 21, 76-97.
60.
StevensonM. (2005, April15). Latin America gold rush comes with concerns. Associated Press.
61.
Sustainanalytics (2010). Jantzi research recommends Goldcorp ineligible for SRI portfolios. Retrieved from www.sustainalytics.com.
62.
TodaNoticia (2010, June18). UN rapporteur calls on Guatemala approve law on indigenous peoples consultation (translated from Spanish). Retrieved from www.todanoticia.com
Transparency International (2010). Corruption perceptions index 2010 results. Retrieved from www.transparency.org/
65.
United Nations Conference for Trade and Development (UNCTAD) and World Bank (2007. March). Chile: The challenge of mineral wealth: Using resource endowments to foster sustainable development. Geneva: Switzerland: Authors.
66.
Van de SandtJ. (2009, September). Mining conflicts and indigenous peoples in Guatemala. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: CORDAID.
67.
Van de WauwJ.EvensR.MachielsL. (2010, October14). Are groundwater overextraction and reduced infiltration contributing to arsenic related health problems near the Marlin mine (Guatemala)?Ghent, Belgium: University of Ghent.
