Contrary to expectations, fishing countries have established relatively effective management plans for a few international fisheries. The model described in this article explains how such multilateral regulation can evolve in spite of strong political and economic barriers to cooperation. Qualitative cases from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas were used to test the model. Although there was not enough political will to maintain stocks at sustainable levels, fishing countries developed successful rebuilding plans for some overfished stocks. Developing countries played a critical role in this arena because the growth of their fleets provided incentives for developed countries to prefer stronger management. When powerful countries with high costs of production began to lose market share under open access, they turned to negotiated access rights in order to protect their fleets. This system also benefited developing countries when they garnered concessions and side payments for their cooperation.
Barkin, S., & Shambaugh, G. (1999). Hypotheses on the international politics of common pool resources. In S. Barkin & G. Shambaugh (Eds.), Anarchy and the environment (pp. 1-25). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
2.
Barrett, S. (2001). International cooperation for sale. European Economic Review, 45, 1835-1850.
3.
Bjorndal, T., Kaitala, V., Lindros, M., & Munro, G. R. (2000). The management of high seas fisheries. Annals of Operations Research, 94, 183-196.
4.
De Leiva Moreno, J. I., & Majkowski, J. (2005). Status of the tuna stocks of the world. In W. H. Bayliff, J. I. De Leiva Moreno, & J. Majkowski (Eds.), Proceedings of the second meeting of the Technical Advisory Committee of the FAO project, management of tunafishing capacity: Conservation and socio-economics (pp. 58-114, FAO Fisheries Proceedings 2). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved July 25, 2006, from http://www.fao.org/docrep/008/y5984e/y5984e0a.htm%23bm10
5.
De Sombre, E. R. (1999). Tuna fishing and common pool resources. In S. Barkin & G. Shambaugh (Eds.), Anarchy and the environment (pp. 51-69). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
6.
De Sombre, E. R. (2000). Domestic sources of international environmental policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
De Sombre, E. R. (2005). Fishing under flags of convenience: Using market power to increase participation in international regulation. Global Environmental Politics, 5(4), 73-94.
8.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2006). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2004. Rome: FAO Fisheries Department. Retrieved July 26, 2006, from http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/007/y5600e/y5600e00.htm%23TopOfPage
9.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Capture Production 1950-2004 Database. (2006). Rome: FAO Fisheries Department, Fishery Information, Data, and Statistics Department. Retrieved August 24, 2006, from http://www.fao.org/fi/statist/fisoft/FISHPLUS.asp
10.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Commodities Production and Trade 1976-2004 Database. (n.d.). Rome: FAO Fisheries Department, Fishery Information, Data, and Statistics Department. Retrieved August 24, 2006, from http://www.fao.org/fi/statist/fisoft/FISHPLUS.asp
11.
Haas, P. M., Keohane, R. O., & Levy, M. A. (Eds.). (1995). Institutions for the earth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
Hannesson, R. (1997). Fishing as supergame. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 32, 309-322.
13.
Hilborn, R., Orensanz, J. M., & Parma, A. M. (2005). Instituions, incentives, and the future of fisheries. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 360, 47-57.
14.
Indian Ocean Tuna Commission. (2005). Report of the eighth session of the scientific committee. Victoria, Seychelles: Author.
15.
Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission. (2006). Tunas and billfishes in the eastern Pacific Ocean in 2005 (Fisheries Status Report #4). La Jolla, CA: Author.
16.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1971). Annual report. Madrid: Author.
17.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1972). Annual report. Madrid: Author.
18.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1973). Annual report. Madrid: Author.
19.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1974). Annual report. Madrid: Author.
20.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1975). Annual report. Madrid: Author.
21.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1976). Annual report. Madrid: Author.
22.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1977). Annual report. Madrid: Author.
23.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1978). Annual report. Madrid: Author.
24.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1979). Annual report. Madrid: Author.
25.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1980). Annual report. Madrid: Author.
26.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1981). Annual report. Madrid: Author.
27.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1982). Annual report. Madrid: Author.
28.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1983). Annual report. Madrid: Author.
29.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1984). Annual report. Madrid: Author.
30.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1985). Annual report. Madrid: Author.
31.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1986). Annual report. Madrid: Author.
32.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1987). Annual report. Madrid: Author.
33.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1988). Annual report. Madrid: Author.
34.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1989). Annual report. Madrid: Author.
35.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1990). Annual report. Madrid: Author.
36.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1991). Annual report. Madrid: Author.
37.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1992). Annual report. Madrid: Author.
38.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1993). Annual report. Madrid: Author.
39.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1994). Annual report. Madrid: Author.
40.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1995a). Annual report of the commission. Madrid: Author.
41.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1995b). Annual report of the Standing Committee on Research and Statistics. Madrid: Author.
42.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1996a). Annual report of the commission. Madrid: Author.
43.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1996b). Annual report of the Standing Committee on Research and Statistics. Madrid: Author.
44.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1997a). Annual report of the commission. Madrid: Author.
45.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1997b). Annual report of the Standing Committee on Research and Statistics. Madrid: Author.
46.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1998a). Annual report of the commission. Madrid: Author.
47.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1998b). Annual report of the Standing Committee on Research and Statistics. Madrid: Author.
48.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1999a). Annual report of the commission. Madrid: Author.
49.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (1999b). Annual report of the Standing Committee on Research and Statistics. Madrid: Author.
50.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (2000a). Annual report of the commission. Madrid: Author.
51.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (2000b). Annual report of the Standing Committee on Research and Statistics. Madrid: Author.
52.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (2001a). Annual report of the commission. Madrid: Author.
53.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (2001b). Annual report of the Standing Committee on Research and Statistics. Madrid: Author.
54.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (2002a). Annual report of the commission. Madrid: Author.
55.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (2002b). Annual report of the Standing Committee on Research and Statistics. Madrid: Author.
56.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (2003a). Annual report of the commission. Madrid: Author.
57.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (2003b). Annual report of the Standing Committee on Research and Statistics. Madrid: Author.
58.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (2004a). Annual report of the commission. Madrid: Author.
59.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (2004b). Annual report of the Standing Committee on Research and Statistics. Madrid: Author.
60.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (2005a). Annual report of the commission. Madrid: Author.
61.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (2005b). Annual report of the Standing Committee on Research and Statistics. Madrid: Author.
62.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. (2006). Compendium of management recommendations resolutions adopted by ICCAT for the conservation of Atlantic tunas and tuna-like species. Madrid: Author. Retrieved July 13, 2006, from http://www.iccat.es/RecsRegs.asp
63.
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas Landings 1950-2004 Database. (2006). [Catch data]. Retrieved July 23, 2006, from http://www.iccat.es/downloads.htm
64.
International Monetary Fund World Economic Outlook Database (2006). [Economic data]. Retrieved September 19, 2006, from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2006/02/data/download.aspx.
65.
Juda, L. (1996). International law and ocean use management. New York: Routledge.
66.
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2001). Power and interdependence (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.
67.
March, J., & Simon, H. (1958). Organizations. New York: John Wiley.
68.
McKelvey, R., Sandal, L., & Steinshamn, S. (2003). Regional fisheries management on the high seas: The hit-and-run interloper model. International Game Theory Review, 5(4), 327-345.
69.
Munro, G., Van Houtte, A., & Willmann, R. (2004). The conservation and management of shared fish stocks: Legal and economic aspects (FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 465). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
70.
Opsomer, J. D., & Conrad, J. M. (1994). An open-access analysis of the northern anchovy fishery. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, 21-37.
71.
Peterson, M. J. (1995). International fisheries management. In P. M. Haas, R. O. Keohane, & M. A. Levy (Eds.), Institutions for the earth (pp. 249-305). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72.
Sprinz, D., & Vaahtoranta, T. (1994). The interest-based explanation of international environmental policy. International Organization, 48(1), 77-105.
73.
Stokke, O. S., Anderson, L. G., & Mirovitskaya, N. (1999). The Barents Sea fisheries. In O. Young (Ed.), The effectiveness of international environmental regimes (pp. 91-154). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
74.
Sydnes, A. K. (2001). Regional fishery organizations: How and why organizational diversity matters. Ocean Development and International Law, 32(4), 349-372.
75.
Webster, D. G. (2006). The marlin conundrums: Turning the tide for by-catch species. Bulletin of Marine Science, 79(3), 561-575.
76.
World Development Indicators Online Database. (2006). [Economic data]. Retrieved September 19, 2006, from http://devdata.worldbank.org/dataonline/old-default.htm
