Costa Rica's Biodiversity Law of 1998 is perhaps the most comprehensive legislation implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity. It includes provisions to better protect the intellectual property rights of rural communities regarding uses they have developed for natural resources and plants and animals they have bred. This article addresses how groups representing these peoples—the National Indigenous Board and National Peasant Board—obtained these provisions despite opposition from traditionally more powerful scientific and business communities. Data were collected on the formulation of the Biodiversity Law through qualitative techniques, including intensive interviews and archival research. It was found that fortuitous political conditions, or political opportunity structures, were crucial to the success of organizations representing rural communities. These supports included better-resourced allies, favorable international legal obligations and public opinion, and existing law that could be built on. Indicating broader patterns, it also was found that such political conditions have been salient during indigenous and peasant political activism elsewhere in Latin America and during formulation of similar biodiversity policy in developing countries.
Ameringer, C. (1982). Democracy in Costa Rica. New York: Praeger.
2.
Anuradha, R.V., Taneja, B., & Kothari, A. (2001). Experiences with biodiversity policy making and community registers in India. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
3.
Arias Sánchez, O. (1983). Grupos de Presión en Costa Rica [Pressure groups in Costa Rica]. San José, Costa Rica: Editorial Costa Rica.
4.
Asamblea Legislativa. (1998a). Ley de Biodiversidad No. 7788(Expediente No. 12.635) [Biodiversity Law No.7788, Proceeding No. 12.635]. San José, Costa Rica: Departamento de Archivo, Investigación y Trámite.
5.
Asamblea Legislativa. (1998b, May 27). Ley de Biodiversidad No. 7788 [Biodiversity Law No. 7788]. La Gaceta, pp. 1-10.
6.
Asociación de Desarrollo Integral del Territorio Indígena Bribri (ADITIBRI), Gobierno de Canadá, & Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad (INBio). (1998, June). Diálogo sobre Recursos Naturales y Desarrollo Sostenible en los Territorios Indígenas entre Líderes de Talamanca y Canadá [Dialogue on natural resources and sustainable development in the indigenous territories between leaders of Talamanca and Canada] (Conference in Shiroles, Costa Rica, February 18-20, 1998). Santo Domingo, Costa Rica: Author.
7.
Barber, C., Glowka, L., & La Viña, A. (2002). Developing and implementing national measures for genetic resources access regulation and benefit-sharing. In S. Laird (Ed.),Biodiversity and traditional knowledge: Equitable partnerships in practice (pp. 363-414). London: Earthscan.
8.
Booth, J. (1998). Costa Rica: Quest for democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview.
9.
Borge, C., & Villalobos, V. (1994). Talamanca en la Encrucijada [Talamanca in the crossroads]. Sabanilla, Costa Rica: Editorial Universidad Estatal a Distancia.
10.
Brockett, C. (1991). The structure of political opportunities and peasant mobilization in Central America. Comparative Politics,23, 253-274.
11.
Brysk, A. (2000). From tribal village to global village: Indian rights and international relations in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
Cabrera Medaglia, J. (2004). Access to genetic resources, protection of traditional knowledge, and intellectual property rights: The Costa Rican experience. In S. Twarog & P. Kapoor (Eds.),Protecting and promoting traditional knowledge: Systems, national experiences and international dimensions (pp. 197-212). New York: United Nations.
13.
De Azqueta, D. (1997, September). El Conocimiento Indígena sobre la Biodiversidad y sus Usos [Indigenous knowledge on biodiversity and its uses]. Ambien-Tico, pp. 1-8.
14.
Dutfield, G. (2004). Intellectual property, biogenetic resources and traditional knowledge. London: Earthscan.
15.
Edelman, M. (1998). Transnational peasant politics in Central America. Latin American Research Review, 33, 49-86.
16.
García, R., Obando, V., & Solís, G. (1998). Informe de País al Convención sobre la Diversidad Biológica: Costa Rica[Country report to the convention on biological diversity: Costa Rica]. San José, Costa Rica: Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad (INBio).
17.
Georgetown University Political Database of the Americas. (2005). República de Costa Rica[Republic of Costa Rica]. Retrieved May 17, 2005, from http://www.georgetown.edu/pdba/Constitutions/Costa/costa2.html.
18.
GRAIN. (2005). Access and benefit sharing. Retrieved April 7, 2006, from http://www.grain.org/brl/?typeid=20.
19.
Hopkins, J. (1995). Policy making for conservation in Latin America: national parks, reserves, and the environment. Westport, CT: Praeger.
20.
Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad. (INBio). (1992). Conservando, Conociendo y Utilizando la Biodiversidad Costarricense: Informe Annual 1991 [Conserving, knowing and using Costa Rican biodiversity: Annual report 1991]. Heredia, Costa Rica: Author.
21.
Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad. (INBio). (2004). Lista de Acuerdos de Bioprospección: Académicos, Fundaciones y Otros [List of bioprospecting agreements: Academic, foundations and others]. Retrieved May 17, 2005, from http://www.inbio.ac.cr/pdf/acuerdos%20academia.pdf.
22.
Madrigal, P., Solís Rivera, V., Ayales Cruz, I., & Marozzi Rojas, M. (1997). The sustainable use of biodiversity in Mesoamerica: Towards the consolidation of democracy. San José, Costa Rica: World Conservation Union (IUCN).
23.
Martin, P. (2003). The globalization of contentious politics: The Amazonian indigenous rights movement. New York: Routledge.
24.
Martínez, L. (1996). Proyecto de Ley, Ley de Biodiversidad, Expediente No. 12635[The Biodiversity Bill, Proceeding No. 12635].San José, Costa Rica:Asamblea Legislativa
25.
Martínez, L. (Ed.). (1997). El Desafío de la Biodiversidad [The challenge of biodiversity]. San José, Costa Rica: Asamblea Legislativa.
26.
Mesa Nacional Indígena. (2002). Informe Final: Consulta sobre la Naturaleza y Alcances de los Derechos Intelectuales Comunitarios Sui Generis [Final report: Consultations on the nature and scope of the sui generis communal intellectual rights]. San José, Costa Rica: Author.
27.
Obando, V. (2002). Biodiversidad en Costa Rica: Estado del Conocimiento y Gestión [Biodiversity in Costa Rica: State of knowledge and management]. Santo Domingo, Costa Rica: Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad (INBio).
28.
Oficina de la Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT) para América Central, Panamá y la República Dominicana. (2001). Convenio No. 169 sobre Pueblos Indígenas y Tribales en Países Independientes [Convention No. 169 concerning indigenous and tribal peoples in independent countries]. San José, Costa Rica: Author.
29.
Porter, G., & Welsh Brown, J. (1996). Global environmental politics. Boulder, CO: Westview.
30.
Programa Cambio Social, Biodiversidad y Sostenibilidad del Desarrollo. (CAMBIOS). (1998). La Biodiversidad y sus Recursos: ¿Cómo los Defendemos y Cómo los Recuperamos? [Biodiversity and its resources: How do we defend them and how do we recover them?]Heredia, Costa Rica: Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica.
31.
Rodríguez Cervantes, S. (1993). Conservation, contradiction and sovereignty erosion: The Costa Rican state and the natural protected areas (1970-1992). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin–Madison.
32.
Rojas, D. (2004, October). Indígenas Ticos Pierden Tierras [Indigenous ticos lose land]. Ambien-Tico, p. 6-6.
33.
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. (2001). Handbook of the Convention on Biological Diversity. London: Earthscan.
34.
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. (2005). Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity/Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Retrieved May 17, 2005, from http://www.biodiv.org/world/parties/asp.
35.
Seligson, M. (1980). Peasants of Costa Rica and the development of agrarian capitalism. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
36.
Silva, E. (1999). Forests, livelihood, and grassroots politics: Chile and Costa Rica compared. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 66, 39-73.
37.
Sittenfeld, A., & Lovejoy, A. (1998). Biodiversity prospecting frameworks: The INBio experience in Costa Rica. In L. Guruswamy & J. McNeely (Eds.), Protection of global biodiversity: Converging strategies (pp. 223-244). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
38.
Solís, V., & Madrigal, P. (1999). Costa Rica's biodiversity law: Sharing the process. Paper prepared for the Workshop on Biodiversity Conservation and the Intellectual Property Regime, organized by the Research and Information System for the Non-Aligned and Other Developing Countries (RIS) with the World Conservation Union (IUCN), New Delhi, India, January 29-31; abridged and edited jointly with Genetic Resources Action International (GRAIN) for the BIO-IPR Internet list server (bio-ipr@cuenet.com).
39.
Solís, V., Madrigal, P., & Ayales, I. (1998). Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica: Un Texto para Todos [The convention on biological diversity: A text for everyone]. San José, Costa Rica: Unión Mundial para la Naturaleza (UICN).
40.
Stavenhagen, R. (2002). Indigenous peoples and the state in Latin America: An ongoing debate. In R. Sieder (Ed.),Multiculturalism in Latin America: Indigenous rights, diversity and democracy (pp. 24-44). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
41.
Steinberg, P. (2001). Environmental leadership in developing countries: Transnational relations and biodiversity policy in Costa Rica and Bolivia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42.
Swaby Rodríguez, A. (1994). Comentarios del Sector Indígena [Commentaries of the indigenous sector]. In R. Salazar, J. Cabrera Medaglia, & A. López Mora (Eds.),Biodiversidad: Políticas y Legislación a la Luz del Desarrollo Sostenible [Biodiversity: Policies and legislation in light of sustainable development] (pp. 303-306). San José, Costa Rica: Fundación AMBIO.
43.
Swiderska, K., Daño, E., & Dubois, O. (2001). Developing the Philippines' Executive Order No. 247 on access to genetic resources. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
44.
Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics(2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Tobin, B., & Swiderska, K. (2001). Speaking in tongues: Indigenous participation in the development of a sui generis regime to protect traditional knowledge in Peru. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
46.
Unión Costarricense de Cámaras y Asociaciones de la Empresa Privada. (UCCAEP). (2005). Cámaras Asociadas [Associated chambers]. Retrieved May 17, 2005, from http://www.uccaep.or.cr/camarasasoc.html%23top.
47.
Van Cott, D. (2000). The friendly liquidation of the past: The politics of diversity in Latin America. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburg Press.
48.
Vargas Mena, E. (1992, August). El INBio y la Merck: ¿El Fin del Colonialismo Farmacológico? [INBio and Merck: The end of pharmacological colonialism?]Ambien-Tico, pp. 3-4.
49.
Watson, V., Cervantes, S., Castro, C., Mora, L., Solís, M., Porras, I., et al. (1998). Abriendo Espacio para una Mejor Actividad Forestal [Making space for better forestry]. San José, Costa Rica: Centro Científico Tropical (CCT).
50.
Wilson, B. (1998). Costa Rica: Politics, economics, and democracy. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
51.
World Bank. (2004). World Development Report 2005: A better investment climate for everyone. Washington, DC: Author.
52.
Wynberg, R., & Swiderska, K. (2001). South Africa's experience in developing a policy on biodiversity and access to genetic resources. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
