During the 1970s, anthropologist Mary Douglas developed a twodimensional framework for cultural comparisons: (a) grid or constraint by rules, and (b) group or incorporation into a bounded social unit. According to Douglas and her colleagues, the four grid/ group types constitute stable social configurations that are associated with distinctive values or ideologies: individualism, fatalism, hierarchy, and egalitarianism. The theory has inspired a great deal of elaboration, numerous intrasocietal studies, some controlled comparisons between social units in different societies, and some limited cross-national studies. Although plausible, the framework has not been subjected to extensive cross-cultural testing. This article addresses a preliminary question in the more rigorous crosscultural testing of the framework: Are grid, group, and ideology empirically separate dimensions as Douglas contends? A pilot study employing factor analysis of precoded variables from the 60-culture Human Relations Area Files (HRAF) probability sample file suggests that they may be. Further steps in testing this theoretical framework are proposed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Almond, G., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
Asad, T. (1979). Anthropology and the analysis of ideology. Man, 14, 607-627.
3.
Atkins, R., Jr. (1991). Egalitarian community: Ethnography and exegesis. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama.
4.
Bale, T. (1997). Toward a ‘cultural theory’ of parliamentary party groups. Journal of Legislative Studies, 3(4), 25-43.
5.
Beidelman, T. O. (1993). Review of Mary Douglas, Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. American Anthropologist, 95(4), 1065-1066.
6.
Boholm, A. (1996). Risk perception and social anthropology: Critique of cultural theory. Ethnos, 61(1-2), 64-84.
7.
Caulkins, D. (1995a). Stumbling into applied anthropology: Collaborative roles of academic researchers. Practicing Anthropology, 17, 21-24.
8.
Caulkins, D. (1995b). High technology entrepreneurs in the peripheral regions of the United Kingdom. In R. Byron (Ed.), Economic futures on the North Atlantic margin: Selected contributions to the Twelfth International Seminar on Marginal Regions(pp. 285-297). Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
9.
Caulkins, D. (1997). Is small still beautiful? Low growth firms and regional development in Scotland’s Silicon Glen. In J. Andelson (Ed.), Anthropology matters: Essays in honor of Ralph Luebben(pp. 53-63). Grinnell, IA: Grinnell College.
10.
Dake, K. (1991). Orienting dispositions in the perception of risk: An analysis of contemporary worldviews and cultural biases. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 22, 61-82.
11.
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
12.
Douglas, M. (1970). Natural symbols, explorations in cosmology. New York: Penguin.
13.
Douglas, M. (1978). Cultural bias(Occasional paper No. 35). London: Royal Anthropological Institute.
14.
Douglas, M. (1982). In the active voice. Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
15.
Douglas, M. (1989). Culture and collective action. In M. Freilich (Ed.), The relevance of culture(pp. 39-55). New York: Bergin and Garvey.
16.
Douglas, M. (1991). Forward. In R. Atkins, Jr., Egalitarian community: Ethnography and exegesis(pp. ix-xv). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama.
17.
Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.
18.
Douglas, M.,& Ney, S. (1998). Missing persons: A critique of personhood in the social sciences. Berkeley: University of California Press.
19.
Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20.
Ellis, R., & Wildavsky, A. (1990). A cultural analysis of the role of abolitionists in the coming of the Civil War. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 31, 89-116.
21.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
Grendstad, G. (1990). Europe by cultures. An exploration in grid/ groupanalysis. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Bergen.
23.
Grendstad, G. (1995). Party followership and leadership in Norway. A political culture approach. Party Politics, 1, 221-243.
24.
Grendstad, G., & Selle, P. (1995). Culture theory and the new institutionalism. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 7, 5-27.
25.
Grendstad, G., & Selle, P. (1996). Kultur som levemaate[Culture as a way of life]. Oslo: Samlaget.
26.
Grendstad, G.,& Selle, P. (1997). Culture theory, postmaterialism and environmental attitudes. In R. Ellis & M. Thompson (Eds.), Culture matters: Essays in honor of Aaron Wildavsky. Boulder, CO: Westview.
27.
Gross, J. L., & Rayner, S. (1985). Measuring culture: A paradigm for the analysis of social organization. NewYork: Columbia University Press.
28.
Heap, S. H., & Ross, A. (Eds.). (1992). Understanding the enterprise culture: Themes in the work of Mary Douglas. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
29.
Hood, C. (1996). Control over bureaucracy: Culture theory and institutional variety. Journal of Public Policy, 15, 207-230.
30.
Johnson, B. B. (1987). The environmentalist movement and grid/group analysis: Amodest critique. In B. B. Johnson& V. T. Covello (Eds.), The social and cultural construction of risk: Essays on risk selection and perception(pp. 147-175). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.
31.
Kemper, T. D., & Collins, R. (1990). Dimensions of microinteraction. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 32-68.
32.
Kim, J., & Mueller, C. (1978). Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
33.
Levinson, D., & Wagner, R. (1986). HRAF research series in quantitative cross-cultural data: Vol. 1. General cultural and religious data. New Haven, CT: HRAF.
34.
Mars, G. (1982). Cheats at work: An anthropology of workplace crime. Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
35.
Mars, G., & Nicod, M. (1984). The world of waiters. Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
36.
Rayner, S. (1991). A cultural perspective on the structure and implementation of global environmental agreements. Evaluation Review, 15, 75-102.
37.
Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
38.
Schwarz, M., & Thompson, M. (1990). Divided we stand: Redefining politics, technology and social choice. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
39.
Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D.P.S., & Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240-275.
40.
Spickard, J. V. (1989). A guide to Mary Douglas’s three versions of grid/group theory. Sociological Analysis, 50, 151-170.
41.
Thompson, M., Ellis, R., & Wildavsky, A. (1990). Culture theory. Boulder, CO: Westview.
42.
Triandis, H. C. (1993). Collectivism and individualism as cultural syndromes. Cross-Cultural Research, 27(3-4), 155-180.
43.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
44.
Wildavsky, A. (1989). Frames of reference come from cultures: A predictive theory. In Morris Freilich (Ed.), The relevance of culture(pp. 58-74). New York: Bergin and Garvey.
