Bringing together the knowledge-, identity-, and morality-based accounts of trust, this article proposes a multilevel framework where all variants of interpersonal/institutional trust are factorially distinct yet collectively subsumed by a moralistic propensity to trust. As such, trust has both object-general and object-specific properties. With the integrated theorizing on trust, I attempt to uncover the causes and consequences of generalized trust toward international institutions, namely, international institutional trust. Specifically, I argue that international institutional trust is derived from a combination of outward exposure (knowledge-based), transnational identity (identity-based), and belief in human goodness (morality-based). Besides, people’s general orientations toward international institutions spill over and shape their more concrete views about world affairs. Individuals high in international institutional trust are expected to hold more favorable attitudes toward immigration and foreign nations. More importantly, given cross-national variability, such spillover effects are moderated by a country’s degree of openness to the international community. While the effects of international institutional trust become stronger in countries with low and high levels of openness, they decrease in countries with middle levels of openness, resulting in a U-shaped pattern. Analyses of the AsiaBarometer Survey and the World Values Survey lend empirical support to the above arguments.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Westley.
2.
BartelsL. M. (1994). The American public’s defense spending preferences in the post-cold war era. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58(4), 479–508. https://doi.org/10.1086/269444
3.
BauerP. C. (2015). Negative experiences and trust: A causal analysis of the effects of victimization on generalized trust. European Sociological Review, 31(4), 397–417. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcu096
4.
BayramA. B. (2015). What drives modern Diogenes? Individual values and cosmopolitan allegiance. European Journal of International Relations, 21(2), 451–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066114541879
5.
BayramA. B. (2017). Aiding strangers: Generalized trust and the moral basis of public support for foreign development aid. Foreign Policy Analysis, 13(1), 133–153.
6.
BayramA. B.ShieldsT. (2021). Who trusts the WHO? Heuristics and Americans’ trust in the World Health Organization during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social Science Quarterly, 102(5), 2312–2330. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12977
7.
BearceD. H.Jolliff ScottB. J. (2019). Popular non-support for international organizations: How extensive and what does this represent?The Review of International Organizations, 14(2), 187–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-019-09351-3
8.
BerghA.ÖhrvallR. (2018). A sticky trait: Social trust among Swedish expatriates in countries with varying institutional quality. Journal of Comparative Economics, 46(4), 1146–1157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2018.06.002
9.
BerinskyA. J. (2009). In time of war: Understanding American public opinion from World War II to Iraq. University of Chicago Press.
10.
BilgicA.Hoogensen GjørvG.WilcockC. (2019). Trust, distrust, and security: An untrustworthy immigrant in a trusting community. Political Psychology, 40(6), 1283–1296. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12613
11.
BinningK. R. (2007). “It’s us against the world”: How distrust in Americans versus people-in-general shapes competitive foreign policy preferences. Political Psychology, 28(6), 777–799. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00603.x
12.
BrewerM. B. (1981). Ethnocentrism and its role in interpersonal trust. In BrewerM. B.CollinsB. E. (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and the social sciences (pp. 214–231). Jossey-Bass.
BrewerP. R.GrossK.AdayS.WillnatL. (2004). International trust and public opinion about world affairs. American Journal of Political Science, 48(1), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519899
16.
BrewerP. R.GrossK.VercellottiT. (2018). Trust in international actors. In UslanerE. M. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social and political trust (pp. 657–686). Oxford.
17.
BrewerP. R.SteenbergenM. R. (2002). All against all: How beliefs about human nature shape foreign policy opinions. Political Psychology, 23(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00269
18.
ChuS.HolbigH.NarlikarA.PlagemannJ. (2024). In the eyes of the beholders: The legitimacy of global governance institutions under multipolarity. International Studies Quarterly, 68(2), sqae034. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqae034
DellmuthL.ScholteJ. A.TallbergJ.VerhaegenS. (2022). Citizens, elites, and the legitimacy of global governance. Oxford University Press.
21.
DellmuthL.TallbergJ. (2023). Legitimacy politics: Elite communication and public opinion in global governance. Cambridge University Press.
22.
DellmuthL. M.ScholteJ. A.TallbergJ. (2019). Institutional sources of legitimacy for international organisations: Beyond procedure versus performance. Review of International Studies, 45(4), 627–646. https://doi.org/10.1017/s026021051900007x
23.
DellmuthL. M.TallbergJ. (2020). Why national and international legitimacy beliefs are linked: Social trust as an antecedent factor. The Review of International Organizations, 15(2), 311–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-018-9339-y
24.
DevineD.ValgarðssonV. O. (2024). Stability and change in political trust: Evidence and implications from six panel studies. European Journal of Political Research, 63(2), 478–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12606
25.
DivenP. J.ConstantelosJ. (2011). The domestic foundations of confidence in the United Nations. Peace Studies Journal, 4(2), 1–23.
26.
DreherA. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied Economics, 38(10), 1091–1110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500392078
27.
DurandC.Peña IbarraL. P.RezguiN.WutchiettD. (2021). How to combine and analyze all the data from diverse sources: A multilevel analysis of institutional trust in the world. Quality and Quantity, 56(3), 1755–1797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01088-1
28.
EdwardsM. S. (2009). Public support for the international economic organizations: Evidence from developing countries. The Review of International Organizations, 4(2), 185–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-009-9057-6
29.
ElffM.HeisigJ. P.SchaefferM.ShikanoS. (2021). Multilevel analysis with few clusters: Improving likelihood-based methods to provide unbiased estimates and accurate inference. British Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 412–426. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123419000097
30.
FanisM. (2011). Secular morality and international security: American and British decisions about war. University of Michigan Press.
31.
FierroJ.ParellaS. (2023). Social trust and support for immigrants’ social rights in Spain. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 49(7), 1881–1897. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2021.1951688
32.
FreitagM.TraunmüllerR. (2009). Spheres of trust: An empirical analysis of the foundations of particularised and generalised trust. European Journal of Political Research, 48(6), 782–803. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.00849.x
33.
GhassimF. (2024). Effects of self-legitimation and delegitimation on public attitudes toward international organizations: A worldwide survey experiment. International Studies Quarterly, 68(2), sqae012. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqae012
34.
GildeaR. J. (2020). Psychology and aggregation in international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 26(S1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066120938830
35.
GlanvilleJ. L.PaxtonP. (2007). How do we learn to trust? A confirmatory tetrad analysis of the sources of generalized trust. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70(3), 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/019027250707000303
36.
GundelachB. (2014). In diversity we trust: The positive effect of ethnic diversity on outgroup trust. Political Behavior, 36(1), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9220-x
37.
GustavssonG.StendahlL. (2020). National identity, a blessing or a curse? The divergent links from national attachment, pride, and chauvinism to social and political trust. European Political Science Review, 12(4), 449–468. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773920000211
38.
HardinR. (2006). Trust. Polity.
39.
HarteveldE.MeerT. V. D.VriesC. E. D. (2013). In Europe we trust? Exploring three logics of trust in the European Union. European Union Politics, 14(4), 542–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116513491018
40.
JohnsonT. (2011). Guilt by association: The link between states’ influence and the legitimacy of intergovernmental organizations. The Review of International Organizations, 6(1), 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-010-9088-z
41.
JohnstonR.BantingK.KymlickaW.SorokaS. (2010). National identity and support for the welfare state. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 43(2), 349–377. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423910000089
42.
JustwanF.FisherS. (2020). Social trust and public opinion about territorial disputes: Evidence from a survey in India. Journal of Global Security Studies, 5(4), 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogz044
43.
KaltenthalerK.MillerW. J. (2013). Social psychology and public support for trade liberalization. International Studies Quarterly, 57(4), 784–790. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12083
44.
KayaA.WalkerJ. T. (2014). How do multilateral institutions influence individual perceptions of international affairs? Evidence from Europe and Asia. The European Journal of Development Research, 26(5), 832–852. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2014.2
45.
KeohaneR. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press.
46.
KongshøjK. (2019). Trusting diversity: Nationalist and multiculturalist orientations affect generalised trust through ethnic in-group and out-group trust. Nations and Nationalism, 25(3), 822–846. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12505
47.
KuM.MitzenJ. (2022). The dark matter of world politics: System trust, summits, and state personhood. International Organization, 76(4), 799–829. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818322000169
48.
LarsonD. W. (1997). Trust and missed opportunities in international relations. Political Psychology, 18(3), 701–734. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00075
49.
LiuJ. H.MilojevP.Gil de ZúñigaH.ZhangR. J. (2018). The global trust inventory as a “proxy measure” for social capital: Measurement and impact in 11 democratic societies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(5), 789–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022118766619
50.
MacdonaldD. (2021). Political trust and support for immigration in the American mass public. British Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 1402–1420. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007123419000668
MacdonaldD.CornacchioneT. (2023). Political trust and support for immigration in the European mass public. Political Behavior, 45(2), 491–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-021-09714-w
MichalosA. C. (1990). The impact of trust on business, international security and the quality of life. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(8), 619–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00383390
NorrisP.InglehartR. (2009). Cosmopolitan communications: Cultural diversity in a globalized world. Cambridge University Press.
57.
PageB. I.ShapiroR. Y. (1992). The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences. University of Chicago Press.
58.
PaxtonP.GlanvilleJ. L. (2015). Is trust rigid or malleable? A laboratory experiment. Social Psychology Quarterly, 78(2), 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272515582177
59.
PeffleyM.HurwitzJ. (1993). Models of attitude constraint in foreign affairs. Political Behavior, 15(1), 61–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00993417
60.
PopkinS. L. (1991). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. University of Chicago Press.
61.
PutnamR. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
62.
PutraI. E.Campbell-ObaidM.SuwartonoC. (2021). Beliefs about human nature as good versus evil influence intergroup attitudes and values. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 27(4), 576–587. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000469.supp
63.
RathbunB. (2012). Trust in international cooperation: International security institutions, domestic politics and American multilateralism. Cambridge University Press.
64.
RobinsonA. L. (2016). Nationalism and ethnic-based trust: Evidence from an African border region. Comparative Political Studies, 49(14), 1819–1854. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016628269
SchlipphakB. (2015). Measuring attitudes toward regional organizations outside Europe. The Review of International Organizations, 10(3), 351–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-014-9205-5
67.
SchlipphakB.MeinersP.KiratliO. S. (2022). Crisis affectedness, elite cues and IO public legitimacy. The Review of International Organizations, 17(4), 877–898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-021-09452-y
68.
SnidermanP. M.TheriaultS. M. (2004). The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing. In SnidermanP. M.SarisW. E. (Eds.), Studies in public opinion: Attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error, and change (pp. 133–165). Princeton University Press.
69.
StolleD. (2002). Trusting strangers–the concept of generalized trust in perspective. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 31(4), 397–412.
70.
TorglerB. (2008). Trust in international organizations: An empirical investigation focusing on the United Nations. The Review of International Organizations, 3(1), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-007-9022-1
71.
UslanerE. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge University Press.
72.
Van BavelJ. J.PackerD. J. (2021). The power of us: Harnessing our shared identities to improve performance, increase cooperation, and promote social harmony: Little.
73.
WalsS. C.Theiss-MorseE.GonzalezF. J.GosdaT. (2015). Love thy neighbor? Trust in foreigners and support for transnational policies. Political Research Quarterly, 68(3), 537–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915594253
74.
WendtA. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press.
75.
WuC. (2020). Does migration affect trust? Internal migration and the stability of trust among Americans. The Sociological Quarterly, 61(3), 523–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2019.1711259
76.
ZallerJ. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
