This article presents a new measure of family-driven age- and gender-related inequalities. This composite measure, which we call the Patriarchy Index, combines a range of variables related to familial behavior that reflect varying degrees of sex- and age-related social inequality across different family settings. We demonstrate the comparative advantages of the index by showing how 266 historical populations from the Atlantic coast of Europe to Moscow scored on the patriarchy scale. We then compare the index with contemporary measures of gender discrimination, and find a strong correlation between historical and current inequality patterns. Finally, we explore how variation in patriarchy levels across Europe is related to the socioeconomic and institutional characteristics of the regional populations, and to variation across these regions in their degree of demographic centrality and environmental conditions. The results confirm previous findings that family organization is a crucial generator of social inequality, and point to the importance of considering the historical context when analyzing the current global contours of inequality.
AlesinaA.GiulianoP. (2014). Family ties. In AghionP.DurlaufS. N. (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth (pp. 177-215). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier North Holland.
2.
AlesinaA.GiulianoP.NunnN. (2013). On the origins of gender roles: Women and the plough. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128, 469-530.
3.
BennettJ. M. (2007). History matters: Patriarchy and the challenge of feminism. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
4.
BirdK.HigginsK.HarrisH. (2010). Spatial poverty traps: An overview (CPRC Working Paper 161). London, England: Chronic Poverty Research Centre.
5.
BivandR. S.PebesmaE.Gómez-RubioV. (2013). Applied spatial data analysis with R (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
6.
BoserupE. (1970). Woman’s role in economic development. London, England: George Allen & Unwin.
7.
CarmichaelS.DilliS.RijpmaA. (2014). Gender inequality in a long term perspective. In van ZandenJ. L.Mira d’ErcoleM.RijpmaA.SmithC.TimmerM. (Eds.), Global well-being and development: A long-term perspective since 1820 (pp. 217-248). Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
8.
CarmichaelS.DilliS.van ZandenJ. L. (2016). Introduction: Family systems and economic development. Economic History of Developing Regions, 31, 1-9.
9.
CarmichaelS.RijpmaA. (2017). Blood is thicker than water: Geography and the dispersal of family characteristics across the globe. Cross-Cultural Research, 51, 142–171.doi: 10.1177/1069397117691025
10.
ColtraneS.AdamsM. (2000). Gender and families. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
11.
DennisonTOgilvieS. (2014). Does the European Marriage Pattern explain economic growth?The Journal of Economic History, 74, 651-693.
12.
DilliS.RijpmaA.CarmichaelS. (2015). Achieving gender equality: Development versus historical legacies. CESifo Economic Studies, 61, 301-334.
13.
DoriusS. F.FirebaughG. (2010). Trends in global gender inequality. Social Forces, 88, 1941-1968.
14.
DrwenskiM. (2015). Data on inequality and the inequality of data: The last two centuries. Journal of World-Historical Information, 2-2(1). doi:10.5195/jwhi.2015.15
15.
DysonT.MooreM. (1983). On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India. Population and Development Review, 9, 35-60.
16.
FolbreN. (1986). Cleaning house: New perspectives on households and economic development. Journal of Development Economics, 22, 5-40.
17.
GoldinC. (2016). Human capital. In DieboltC.HaupertM. (Eds.), Handbook of cliometrics (pp. 55-86). Berlin and Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
18.
GoodyJ. (1976). Production and reproduction: A comparative study of the domestic domain. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
19.
GruberS.SzołtysekM. (2016). The patriarchy index: A comparative study of power relations across historical Europe. The History of the Family, 21, 133-174.
20.
HajnalJ. (1982). Two kinds of preindustrial household formation system. Population and Development Review, 8, 449-494.
21.
HalpernJ. M.KaserK.WagnerR. A. (1996). Patriarchy in the Balkans: Temporal and cross-cultural approaches. The History of the Family, 1, 425-442.
22.
Jimenez-AyoraP.UlubaşoğluM. A. (2015). What underlies weak states? The role of terrain ruggedness. European Journal of Political Economy, 39, 167-183.
23.
JohnstonD. F. (1985). The development of social statistics and indicators on the status of women. Social Indicators Research, 16, 233-261.
24.
JosephS. (1996). Patriarchy and development in the Arab world. Gender & Development, 4, 14-19.
25.
KandiyotiD. (1988). Bargaining with patriarchy. Gender & Society, 2, 274-290.
26.
KlasenS. (2006). UNDP’s gender-related measures: Some conceptual problems and possible solutions. Journal of Human Development, 7, 243-274.
27.
KlüsenerS.DevosI.EkamperP.GregoryI. N.GruberS.Martí-HennebergJ.. . . SolliA. (2014). Spatial inequalities in infant survival at an early stage of the longevity revolution: A pan-European view across 5000+ regions and localities in 1910. Demographic Research, 30, 1849-1864.
28.
KokJ. (2014, December18-20). Women’s agency in historical family systems. Paper presented at the conference “The Deep Causes of Economic Development,”Utrecht, The Netherlands. Retrieved from http://www.cgeh.nl/deep-causes-economic-development
29.
KollerM.StahelW. A. (2011). Sharpening Wald-type inference in robust regression for small samples. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 55, 2504-2515.
30.
MalhotraA.SidneyR. S.BoenderC. (2002). Measuring women’s empowerment as a variable in international development. Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women and the Gender and Development Group of the World Bank, The World Bank.
31.
MalhotraA.VannemanR.KishorS. (1995). Fertility, dimensions of patriarchy, and development in India. Population and Development Review, 21, 281-305.
32.
MasonK. O. (1986). The status of women: Conceptual and methodological issues in demographic studies. Sociological Forum, 1, 284-300.
33.
MedickH. (1976). The proto-industrial family economy: The structural function of household and family during the transition from peasant society to industrial capitalism. Social History, 1, 291-315.
34.
MilanovicB. (2005). Worlds apart: Measuring global and international inequality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
MilanovicB.LindertP. H.WilliamsonJ. G. (2011). Pre-industrial inequality. The Economic Journal, 121, 255-272.
36.
MillerP. (1998). Transformations of patriarchy in the west, 1500-1900. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
37.
MoghadamV. M. (1992). Patriarchy and the politics of gender in modernizing societies: Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan. International Sociology, 7, 35-53.
38.
MurdockG. P. (1949). Social structure. New York, NY: Macmillan.
39.
NarayanD. (Ed.). (2006). Measuring empowerment: Cross-disciplinary perspectives. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
40.
NunnN. (2009). The importance of history for economic development. Annual Review of Economics, 1, 65-92.
41.
RahmanL.RaoV. (2004). The determinants of gender equity in India: Examining Dyson and Moore’s thesis with new data. Population and Development Review, 30, 239-268.
42.
ReherD. S. (1998). Family ties in Western Europe: Persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review, 4, 203-234.
43.
RossetE. (1964). Aging process of population. New York, NY: Macmillan.
44.
RugglesS.RobertsE.SarkarS.SobekM. (2011). The North Atlantic Population Project: Progress and prospects. Historical Methods, 44, 1-6.
45.
SchlegelA. (1972). Male dominance and female autonomy. New Haven, CT: HRAF Press.
46.
SkinnerG. W. (1997). Family systems and demographic processes. In KertzerD. I.FrickeT. (Eds.), Anthropological demography: Toward a new synthesis (pp. 53-95). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
47.
StewartJ. Q.WarntzW. (1958). Macrogeography and social science. Geographical Review, 48, 167-184.
48.
SzołtysekM. (2015a). Households and family systems in early modern Europe. In ScottH. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Early Modern European History, 1350-1750: Vol. I. Peoples and place (pp. 313-341). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
49.
SzołtysekM. (2015b). Rethinking East-central Europe: Family systems and co-residence in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.
50.
SzołtysekM.GruberS. (2016). Mosaic: recovering surviving census records and reconstructing the familial history of Europe. The History of the Family, 21(1), 38-60.
51.
TherbornG. (2004). Between sex and power: Family in the world, 1900-2000. London, England: Routledge.
52.
TherbornG. (Ed.). (2006). Inequalities of the world: New theoretical frameworks, multiple empirical approaches. London, England: Verso.
53.
ToddE. (1987). The causes of progress: Culture, authority and change. New York, NY: Basil.
54.
van ZandenJ. L.BatenJ.FoldvariP.van LeeuwenB. (2014). The changing shape of global inequality 1820-2000; exploring a new dataset. Review of Income and Wealth, 60, 279-297.
55.
van ZandenJ. L.BatenJ.Mira d’ErcoleM.RijpmaA.SmithC.TimmerM. (Eds.). (2014). How was life? Global well-being since 1820. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
56.
WhyteM. K. (1978). The status of women in pre-industrial societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
57.
WilliganJ. D.LynchK. A. (1982). Sources and methods of historical demography. New York, NY: Academic Press.
58.
World Bank. (2011). World Development Report 2012: Gender equality and development. Washington, DC: Author.
59.
YohaiV. J. (1987). High breakdown-point and high efficiency robust estimates for regression. The Annals of Statistics, 15, 642-656.
60.
YoungG.FortL.DannerM. (1994). Moving from the “status of women” to “gender inequality”: Conceptualisation, social indicators and an empirical application. International Sociology, 9, 55-85.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
