The current meta-analysis examines cross-national differences in justice-work attitude and behavior associations to identify underlying justice motives, that is, when and why people pay attention to justice. A three-level meta-analysis with 54,100 participants from 36 countries was conducted. Income inequality and cultural values were used as moderators after statistically controlling for unreliability of measures. Systematic cross-national differences in justice effects were found. Associations of justice with other work variables are stronger if there is greater income inequality, people expect their leaders and institutions to foster commitment and loyalty (institutional collectivism) and individuals identify with their close in-groups (in-group collectivism). This suggests that belongingness (collectivism) and control (income inequality) motives are important. Implications for justice theories and cross-cultural research are discussed.
AdamsJ. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-296). New York, NY: Academic Press.
2.
AllenN. J.MeyerJ. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
3.
*AngS.van DyneL.BegleyT. M. (2003). The employment relationships of foreign workers versus local employees: A field study of organizational justice, job satisfaction, performance, and OCB. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 561-583.
4.
*AquinoK. (1995). Relationship among pay inequity, perceptions of procedural justice, and organizational citizenship. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 8, 21-33.
5.
*Armstrong-StassenM.WagarT. H.CattaneoR. J. (2004). Work-group membership (in)stability and survivors’ reactions to organizational downsizing. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2023-2044.
6.
*AryeeS.BudhwarP. S.ChenZ. X. (2002). Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 267-285.
7.
*AryeeS.ChenZ. X. (2004). Countering the trend towards careerist orientation in the age of downsizing: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of Business Research, 57, 321-328.
8.
*AryeeS.ChenZ. X.BudhwarP. S. (2004). Exchange fairness and employee performance: An examination of the relationship between organizational politics and procedural justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 94, 1-14.
9.
*AryeeS.ChenZ. X.SunL.DebrahY. A. (2007). Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 191-201.
10.
*AscigilS. F.MagnerN. R.SönmezY. (2005). Are employees’ ratings of coworkers’ organizational citizenship behavior influenced by their own perceptions of organizational justice?Psychological Reports, 97, 98-100.
11.
*AycanZ.KabasakalH. (2006). Social contract and perceived justice of workplace practices to cope with financial crisis. Group and Organization Management, 31, 469-502.
12.
*BagdadliS.RobersonQ.PaolettiF. (2006). The mediating role of procedural justice in responses to promotion decisions. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21, 83-102.
13.
*BakerT. L.HuntT. G.AndrewsM. C. (2006). Promoting ethical behavior and organizational citizenship behaviors: The influence of corporate ethical values. Journal of Business Research, 59, 849-857.
14.
*BallG. A.TrevinoL. K.SimsH. P. (1993). Justice and organizational punishment: Attitudinal outcomes of disciplinary events. Social Justice Research, 6, 39-67.
15.
BarryB.ShapiroD. L. (2000). When will grievants desire voice? A test of situational, motivational and attributional explanations. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11, 106-134.
16.
*BegleyT.LeeC. (2005). The role of negative affectivity in pay-at-risk reactions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 382-388.
17.
*BegleyT. M.LeeC.FangY.LiJ. (2002). Power distance as a moderator of the relationship between justice and employee outcomes in a sample of Chinese employees. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17, 692-711.
18.
*BegleyT. M.LeeC.HuiC. (2006). Organizational level as a moderator of the relationship between justice perceptions and work-related reactions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 705-721.
19.
*Ben-AriR.TsurY.Har-EvenD. (2006). Procedural justice, stress appraisal, and athletes’ attitudes. International Journal of Stress Management, 13, 23-44.
20.
*BettencourtL. A.BrownS. W.MacKenzieS. B. (2005). Customer-oriented boundary-spanning behaviors: Test of a social exchange model of antecedents. Journal of Retailing, 81, 141-157.
21.
*BiesR. J.MartinC. L.BrocknerJ. (1993). Just laid off, but still a “good citizen?” Only if the process is fair. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6, 227-238.
22.
BiesR. J.MoagJ. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In LewickiR. J.SheppardB. H.BazermanB. H. (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43-55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
23.
*BladerS. L.ChangC. C.TylerT. R. (2001). Procedural justice and retaliation in organizations: Comparing cross-nationally the importance of fair group processes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 295-311.
24.
BladerS. L.TylerT. R.2009. Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes and extrarole behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 445-464.
25.
*BlakelyG. L.AndrewsM. C.MoormanR. H. (2005). The moderating effects of equity sensitivity on the relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20, 259-273.
26.
BlieseP. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analyses. In KleinJ. K.KozlowskiS. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations. Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-381). San Francisco, CA: Josey Bass
27.
*BlieseP. D.StetzM. C. (2007). Modeling the effects of efficacy, justice, and conflict among reservists activated for homeland defense. Military Psychology, 19, 27-43.
28.
*BowlerW. M.BrassD. J. (2006). Relational correlates of interpersonal citizenship behavior: A social network perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 70-82.
29.
*BrashearT. G.ManolisC.BrooksC. M. (2005). The effects of control, trust, and justice on salesperson turnover. Journal of Business Research, 58, 241-249.
30.
BrayfieldA. H.RotheH. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 307-311.
31.
BrocknerJ.AckermanG.GreenbergJ.GelfandM. J.FrancescoA. M.ChenZ. X.ShapiroD. (2001). Cultural and procedural justice: The influence of power distance on reactions to voice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 300-315.
32.
BrocknerJ.ChenY. R.MannixE. A.LeungK.SkarlickiD. P. (2000). Culture and procedural fairness: When the effects of what you do depend on how you do it. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 138-159.
33.
BrocknerJ.De CremerD.van den BosK.ChenY. R. (2005). The influence of interdependent self-construal on procedural fairness effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 155-167.
34.
*ButtigiegD. M.DeeryS. J.IversonR. D. (2007). An event history analysis of union joining and leaving. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 829-839.
35.
*ByrneZ. S. (2005). Fairness reduces the negative effects of organizational politics on turnover intentions, citizenship behavior and job performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20, 175-200.
36.
*CamermanJ.CropanzanoR.VandenbergheC. (2007). The benefits of justice for temporary workers. Group and Organization Management, 32, 176-207.
37.
*CantisanoG. T.DomínguezJ. M. (2005). Specific determinants of work satisfaction, burnout and health consequences: A exploratory study among prison officers [Determinantes específicos de la satisfacción laboral, el burnout y sus consecuencias para la salud: Un estudio exploratorio con funcionarios de prisiones]. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 5, 73-83.
38.
CarlD.GuptaV.JavidanM. (2004). Power distance. In HouseR. J.HangesP. J.JavidanM.DorfmanP. W.GuptaV. (Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp. 513-563). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
39.
*ChanD. (2006). Interactive effects of situational judgment effectiveness and proactive personality on work perceptions and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 475-481.
40.
*ChangE. (2002). Distributive justice and organizational commitment revisited: Moderation by layoff in the case of Korean employees. Human Resource Management, 41, 261-270.
41.
*ChangE. (2005). Employees’ overall perception of HRM effectiveness. Human Relations, 58, 523-544.
42.
*ChiaburuD. S.MarinovaS. V. (2006). Employee role enlargement: Interactions of trust and organizational fairness. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 27, 168-182.
43.
*ChoiJ.ChenC. C. (2007). The relationships of distributive justice and compensation system fairness to employee attitudes in international joint ventures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 687-703.
44.
*ChughtaiA. A.ZafarS. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of organizational commitment among pakistani university teachers. Applied H.R.M.Research, 11, 39-64.
45.
Cohen-CharashY.SpectorP. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278-321.
46.
*ColquittJ. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386-400.
47.
ColquittJ. A.ConlonD. E.WessonM. J.PorterC. O. L. H.NgK. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445.
48.
ColquittJ. A.GreenbergJ.ScottB. A. (2005). Organizational justice: Where do we stand? In GreenbergJ.ColquittJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 113-154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49.
CropanzanoR.ByrneZ. S.BobocelD. R.RuppD. E. (2001). Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 164-209.
50.
CropanzanoR.GreenbergJ. (1997). Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze. In CooperC. L.RobertsonI. T. (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 317-372). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
51.
DahlE.ElstadJ. I.HofossD.Martin-MollardM. (2006). For whom is income inequality most harmful? A multi-level analysis of income inequality and mortality in Norway. Social Science & Medicine, 63, 2562-2574.
52.
*DalyJ. P.GeyerP. D. (1995). Procedural fairness and organizational commitment under conditions of growth and decline. Social Justice Research, 8, 137-151.
53.
*De BoerE. M.BakkerA. B.SyroitJ. E.SchaufeliW. B. (2002). Unfairness at work as a predictor of absenteeism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 181-197.
54.
*De CremerD. (2005). Procedural and distributive justice effects moderated by organizational identification. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20, 4-13.
55.
*De CremerD.TylerT. R. (2007). The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 639-649.
56.
*De CremerD.van HielA. (2006). Effects of another person’s fair treatment on one’s own emotions and behaviors: The moderating role of how much the other cares for you. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 231-249.
57.
*De CremerD.van KnippenbergD. (2002). How do leaders promote cooperation? The effects of charisma and procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 858-866.
58.
*De CremerD.van KnippenbergD.van DijkeM.BosA. E. R. (2004). How self-relevant is fair treatment? Social self-esteem moderates interactional justice effects. Social Justice Research, 17, 407-419.
59.
de LuqueM.JavidanM. (2004). Uncertainty avoidance. In HouseJ. S.HangesP. J.JavidanM.DorfmanP. W.GuptaV. (Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp. 602-653). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
60.
*DelugaR. J. (1995). The relation between trust in the supervisor and subordinate organizational citizenship behavior. Military Psychology, 7, 1-16.
61.
DeutschM. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice?Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-150.
62.
DiekmannK. A.SondakH.BarsnessZ. I. (2007). Does fairness matter more to some than to others? The moderating role of workplace status on the relationship between procedural fairness perceptions and job satisfaction. Social Justice Research, 20, 161-181.
63.
*EdgarF.GeareA. (2005). HRM practice and employee attitudes: Different measures—Different results. Personnel Review, 34, 534-549.
64.
*ErtiürkA. (2007). Increasing organizational citizenship behaviors of turkish academicians: Mediating role of trust in supervisor on the relationship between organizational justice and citizenship behaviors. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 257-270.
65.
*FarhJ.EarleyP. C.LinS. (1997). A cultural analysis of justice and organisational citizenship behaviour in Chinese society. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 421-444.
66.
FassinaN. E.JonesD. A.UggerslevK. L. (2008). Meta-analytic tests of relationships between organizational justice and citizenship behaviour: Testing agent-system and shared-variance models. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 805-828.
67.
*FieldsDPangM.ChiuC. (2000). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of employee outcomes in Hong Kong. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 547-562.
68.
*FischerR. (2004). Organizational reward allocation principles: Testing organizational and cross-cultural differences. International Journal for Intercultural Relations, 28, 151-164.
69.
FischerR. (2008). Organizational Justice and Reward Allocation. In SmithP. B.PetersonM.ThomasD. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural management (pp. 135-150). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
70.
FischerR. (2009). Where is culture in cross-cultural research? An outline of a multi-level research process for measuring culture as a shared meaning system. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 9, 25-49.
71.
FischerR.BoerD. (2011). What is more important for national well-being: Money or autonomy? A meta-analysis of well-being, burnout and anxiety across 63 societies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 164-184. doi:10.1037/a0023663
72.
*FischerR.FerreiraM. C.JiangD. Y.ChenB. S.AchouiM.WongC. C.AssmarE. M. L. (2011). Are perceptions of organizational justice universal? An exploration of measurement invariance across thirteen cultures. Social Justice Research, 24, 297-313. doi:10.1007/s11211-011-0142-7
73.
FischerR.MansellA. (2009). Commitment across cultures: A meta-analytical approach. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 1339-1358.
74.
FischerR.SmithP. B. (2003). Reward allocation and culture: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 251-268.
75.
*FischerR.SmithP. B. (2004). Values and organizational justice: Performance and seniority-based allocation criteria in UK and Germany. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 669-688.
76.
*FischerR.SmithP. B. (2006). Who cares about justice? The moderating effect of values on the link between organizational justice and work behavior. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55, 541-562.
77.
*FischerR.SmithP. B.RicheyB.FerreiraM. C.AssmarE. M. L.MaesJ.StumpfS. (2007). How do organizations allocate rewards? The predictive validity of national values, economic and organizational factors across six nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 3-18.
78.
FolgerR. (1977). Distributive and procedural justice: Combined impact of “voice” and improvement on experienced inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 108-119.
79.
FolgerR. (1998), Fairness as moral virtue. In SchminkeM. (Ed.), Managerial ethics: Moral management of people and processes (pp. 13-34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
80.
FolgerR.CropanzanoR. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
81.
FontaineJ. R. (2008). Traditional and multilevel approaches in cross-cultural research: An integration of methodological frameworks. In van de VijverF. J. R.van HemertD. A.PoortingaY. (Eds.), Individuals and cultures in multi-level analysis (pp. 65-92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
82.
FontaineJ. R. J. (2005). Equivalence. In Kempf-LeonardK. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of social measurement (Vol. 1, pp. 803-813). New York, NY: Academic Press.
83.
*FranzC. (2004). A cross-cultural study of employee empowerment and organizational justice. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: Sciences and Engineering, 65(4-B), 2132.
84.
GelfandM. J.BhawukD. P.NishiiL.BechtoldD. (2004). Individualism and collectivism. In HouseR. J.HangesP. J.JavidanM.DorfmanP. W.GuptaV. (Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 cultures (pp. 437-512). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
85.
*GellatlyI. R. (1995). Individual and group determinants of employee absenteeism: Test of a causal model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 469-485.
86.
*GilesW. F.FindleyH. M.FieldH. S. (1997). Procedural fairness in performance appraisal: Beyond the review session. Journal of Business and Psychology, 11, 493-506.
87.
GillespieJ. Z.GreenbergJ. (2005). Are the goals of organizational justice self-interested? In GreenbergJ.ColquittJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 179-214). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
88.
*GordonM. E.BowlbyR. L. (1988). Propositions about grievance settlements: Finally, consultation with grievants. Personnel Psychology, 41, 107-123.
89.
*GordonM. E.FryxellG. E. (1989). Voluntariness of association as a moderator of the importance of procedural and distributive justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 993-1009.
90.
GreenbergJ. (1993a). Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 81-103.
91.
GreenbergJ. (1993b). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In CropanzanoR. (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp.79-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
92.
GreenbergJ. (2001). Setting the justice agenda: Seven unanswered questions about “what, why and how”. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 58, 210-219.
93.
GreenbergJ. (2002). Who stole the money, and when? Individual and situational determinants of employee theft. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 985-1003.
94.
*HarveyS.HainesV. Y.III. (2005). Employer treatment of employees during a community crisis: The role of procedural and distributive justice. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20, 53-68.
95.
*HassanA.ChandaranS. (2005). Quality of supervisor-subordinate relationship and work outcome: Organizational justice as mediator. IIUM Journal of Economics and Management, 13, 33-52.
96.
HofstedeG. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
97.
HofstedeG. (2006). What did GLOBE really measure? Researchers’ minds versus respondents’ minds. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 882-896.
98.
HomansG. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. NY: Harcourt, Brace, & World.
99.
*HopkinsS. M.WeathingtonB. L. (2006). The relationships between justice perceptions, trust, and employee attitudes in a downsized organization. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 140, 477-498.
100.
*HorvathM.AndrewsS. B. (2007). The role of fairness perceptions and accountability attributions in predicting reactions to organizational events. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 141, 203-222.
101.
HouseR. J.HangesP. J.JavidanM.DorfmanP.GuptaV. (2004). GLOBE, cultures, leadership, and organizations: GLOBE study of 62 societies. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
102.
*HowardL. W. (1999). Validity evidence for measures of procedural/distributive justice and pay/benefit satisfaction. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14, 135-147.
103.
*IgalensJ.RousselP. (1999). A study of the relationship between compensation package, work motivation and job satisfaction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 1003-1025.
104.
*IrvingP. G.ColemanD. F.BobocelD. R. (2005). The moderating effect of negative affectivity in the procedural justice-job satisfaction relation. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 37, 20-32.
105.
*IversonR. D.ButtigiegD. M. (1999). Affective, normative and continuance commitment: Can the “right kind” of commitment be managed?Journal of Management Studies, 36, 307-333.
106.
*JanssenO. (2004). How fairness perceptions make innovative behavior more or less stressful. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 201-215.
107.
*JelinekR.AhearneM. (2006). The enemy within: Examining salesperson deviance and its determinants. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 26, 327-344.
108.
JonesD. A.MartensM. L. (2009). The mediating role of overall fairness and the moderating role of trust certainty in justice-criteria relationships: The formation and use of fairness heuristics in the workplace. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 1025-1051.
109.
JonesF. F.ScarpelloV.BergmannT. (1999). Pay procedures-what makes them fair?Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 129-145.
110.
*JudgeT. A.ColquittJ. A. (2004). Organizational justice and stress: The mediating role of work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 395-404.
111.
KenrickD. T.GriskeviciusV.NeubergS. L.SchallerM. (2010). Renovating the pyramid of needs: Contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 292-314.
112.
*KhatriN.FernC. T.BudhwarP. (2006). Explaining employee turnover in an Asian context. Human Resource Management Journal, 11, 54-74.
113.
KimT. Y.LeungK. (2007). Forming and reacting to overall fairness: A cross-cultural comparison. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 104, 83-95.
114.
KirkmanB. L.LoweK. B.GibsonC. B. (2006). A quarter century of Culture’s Consequences: A review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural value framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 285-320.
115.
*KirkmanB. L.ShapiroD. L. (2000). Understanding why team members won’t share—An examination of factors related to employee receptivity to team-based rewards. Small Group Research, 31, 175-209.
116.
*KnudsenH. K.DucharmeL. J.RomanP. M. (2006). Counselor emotional exhaustion and turnover intention in therapeutic communities. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 31, 173-180.
117.
*KonovskyM. A.FolgerR. (1991). The effects of procedures, social accounts, and benefits level on victims’ layoff reactions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 630-650.
118.
*KonovskyM. A.FolgerR.CropanzanoR. (1987). Relative effects of procedural and distributive justice on employee attitudes. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 17, 15-24.
119.
KonstantopoulosS.HedgesL. V. (2004). Meta-analysis. In KaplanD. (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 281-297). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
120.
*KumarN.ScheerL. K.SteenkampJ. (1995). The effects of supplier fairness on vulnerable resellers. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 54-65.
121.
*KuvaasB. (2006). Work performance, affective commitment, and work motivation: The roles of pay administration and pay level. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 365-385.
122.
*KwongJ. Y. Y.LeungK. (2002). A moderator of the interaction effect of procedural justice and outcome favorability: Importance of the relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 278-299.
123.
*LamS. S. K.SchaubroeckJ.AryeeS. (2002). Relationship between organizational justice and employee work outcomes: A cross-national study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 1-18.
124.
*LeeC.FarhJ. L. (1999). The effects of gender in organizational justice perception. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 133-143.
125.
*LeeC.PillutlaM.LawK. S. (2000). Power-distance, gender and organizational justice. Journal of Management, 26, 685-704.
126.
LeungK. (2005). How generalizable are justice effects across cultures? In GreenbergJ.ColquittJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 555-588). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
127.
*LeungK.SmithP. B.WangZ.SunH. (1996). Job satisfaction in Joint venture hotels in China: An organizational justice analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 27, 947-962.
128.
*LeungK.WangZ.SmithP. B. (2001). Job attitudes and organizational justice in joint venture hotels in china: The role of expatriate managers. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 12, 926-945.
129.
LeventhalG. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In GergenK. J.GreenbergM. S.WillisR. H. (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-54). New York, NY: Plenum.
130.
*LiH.BinghamJ. B.UmphressE. E. (2007). Fairness at the top: Perceived procedural justice and collaborative problem solving in new product development. Organization Science, 18, 200-216.
131.
*LiaoH.RuppD. E. (2005). The impact of justice climate and justice orientation on work outcomes: A cross-level multifoci framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 242-256.
132.
LindE. A. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In GreenbergJ.CropanzanoR. (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 56-88). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
133.
LindE. A.TylerT. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Plenum.
134.
LindE. A.TylerT. R.HuoY. J. (1997). Procedural context and culture: Variations in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 767-780.
135.
LindE. A.Van den BosK. (2002). When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management. In StawB. M.KramerR. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 24, pp. 181-223). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
136.
*LipponenJ.OlkkonenM.MoilanenM. (2004). Perceived procedural justice and employee responses to an organizational merger. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13, 391-413.
137.
*LipponenJ.OlkkonenM.MyyryL. (2004). Personal value orientation as a moderator in the relationships between perceived organizational justice and its hypothesized consequences. Social Justice Research, 17, 275-292.
138.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. London, UK: SAGE.
139.
LubkeG. H.DolanC. V.KeldermanH.MellenberghG. J. (2003). On the relationship between sources of within- and between-group differences and measurement invariance in the common factor model. Intelligence, 31, 543-566.
140.
MaslowA. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
141.
MastersonS. S.LewisK.GoldmanB. M.TaylorM. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 738-748.
142.
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H.SchoormanF. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709-734.
143.
*McAllisterD. J.KamdarD.MorrisonE. W.TurbanD. B. (2007). Disentangling role perceptions: How perceived role breadth, discretion, instrumentality, and efficacy relate to helping and taking charge. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1200-1211.
144.
*McComasK.TuiteL. S.WaksL.ShermanL. A. (2007). Predicting satisfaction and outcome acceptance with advisory committee meetings: The role of procedural justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 905-927.
145.
*McFarlinD. B.SweeneyP. D. (1996). Does having a say matter only if you get your way? Instrumental and value-expressive effects of employee voice. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 289-303.
146.
*MoormanR. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845-855.
147.
MowdayR. T.SteersR. M.PorterL. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224-247.
148.
NiehoffB. P.MoormanR. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 527-556.
149.
*OlkkonenM.LipponenJ. (2006). Relationships between organizational justice, identification with organization and work unit, and group-related outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 202-215.
150.
OngA. (1988). The production of possession: Spirits and the multinational corporation in Malaysia. American Ethnologist, 15, 28-42.
151.
OrganD. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. In StawB.CummingsL. L (Eds.), Research in organisational behaviour (Vol. 12, pp. 43-72). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
152.
OysermanD.LeeS. W. S. (2008). Does culture influence what and how we think? Effects of priming individualism and collectivism. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 311-342.
153.
*ParéG.TremblayM. (2007). The influence of high-involvement human resources practices, procedural justice, organizational commitment, and citizenship behaviors on information technology professionals’ turnover intentions. Group and Organization Management, 32, 326-357.
154.
*PearceJ. L.BigleyG. A.BranyiczkiI. (1998). Procedural justice as modernism: Placing industrial/organizational psychology in context. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 47, 371-396.
155.
*PearceJ. L.BranyiczkiI.BakacsiG. (1994). Person-based reward systems—A theory of organizational reward practices in reform-communist organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 261-282.
156.
*PillaiR.WilliamsE. S.TanJ. J. (2001). Are the scales tipped in favor of procedural or distributive justice? An investigation of the U.S., India, Germany, and Hong Kong (China). International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 312-332.
157.
PriceJ. L.MuellerC. W. (1986). Handbook of organizational measurement. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
158.
*RahimM. A.AntonioniD.PsenickaC. (2001). A structural equations model of leader power, subordinates’ styles of handling conflict, and job performance. International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 191-211.
159.
*RamamoorthyN.FloodP. C. (2004). Gender and employee attitudes: The role of organizational justice perceptions. British Journal of Management, 15, 247-258.
160.
*RamamoorthyN.FloodP. C.MacCurtainS.GuptaA.KulkarniS. P. (2006, July). Role of organizational justice perceptions in India and Ireland: An empirical examination. Paper presented at the Academy of World Business, Marketing & Management Development, Paris, France.
161.
*RamamoorthyN.FloodP. C.SlatteryT.SardessaiR. (2005). Determinants of innovative work behaviour: Development and test of an integrated model. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14, 142-150.
162.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
163.
*RegoA.SoutoS. (2004). A percepção de justiça como antecedente do comprometimento organizacional: Um estudo luso-brasileiro [The perception of justice as an antecedent of organizational commitment: A Luso-Brazilian study]. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 8, 151-177.
164.
*ReithelS. M.BaltesB. B.BuddhavarapuS. (2007). Cultural differences in distributive and procedural justice: Does a two-factor model fit for Hong Kong employees?International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 7, 62-76.
165.
*RiolliL.SavickiV. (2006). Impact of fairness, leadership, and coping on strain, burnout, and turnover in organizational change. International Journal of Stress Management, 13, 351-377.
166.
*RochS. G.ShanockL. R. (2006). Organizational justice in an exchange framework: Clarifying organizational justice distinctions. Journal of Management, 32, 299-322.
167.
RosenthalR. (1991). Meta-analytical procedures for social research (Rev. ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
168.
*SaksA. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 600-619.
169.
*ScanduraT. A. (1997). Mentoring and organizational justice: An empirical investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 51, 58-69.
170.
SchmittD. P.AllikJ.McCraeR. R.Benet-MartinezV. (2007). The geographic distribution of Big Five personality traits: Patterns and profiles of human self-description across 56 nations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 173-212.
171.
*SchmittM.DorfelM. (1999). Procedural injustice at work, justice sensitivity, job satisfaction and psychosomatic well-being. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 443-453.
172.
ScottR. A. (1976). Deviance, sanctions, and social integration in small-scale societies. Social Forces, 54, 604-620.
173.
ShapiroD. L.BrettJ. M. (1993). Comparing three processes underlying judgments of procedural justice: A field study of mediation and arbitration, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1167-1177.
174.
*ShultzT.Brender-llanY. (2004). Beyond justice: Introducing personal moral philosophies to ethical evaluations of human resource practices. Business Ethics: A European Review, 13, 302-316.
175.
*SiegelP. A.PostC.BrocknerJ.FishmanA. Y.GardenC. (2005). The moderating influence of procedural fairness on the relationship between work-life conflict and organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 13-24.
176.
*SmithH. J.ThomasT. R.TylerT. R. (2006). Concrete construction employees: When does procedural fairness shape self-evaluations?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 644-663.
177.
*StinglhamberF.De CremerD.MerckenL. (2006). Perceived support as a mediator of the relationship between justice and trust: A multiple foci approach. Group and Organization Management, 31, 442-468.
178.
*St-OngeS. (2000). Variables influencing the perceived relationship between performance and pay in the merit pay environment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 14, 459-479.
179.
SweeneyP. D.McFarlinD. B. (1993). Workers’ evaluation of the “ends” and the “means”: An examination of the models of distributive justice and procedural justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 23-40.
180.
*TanskyJ. W. (1993). Justice and organizational citizenship behavior: What is the relationship?Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 6, 195-207.
181.
*TekleabA. G.TakeuchiR.TaylorM. S. (2005). Extending the chain of relationships among organizational justice, social exchange, and employee reactions: The role of contract violations. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 146-157.
182.
*TepperB. J.DuffyM. K.HenleC. A.LambertL. S. (2006). Procedural injustice, victim precipitation, and abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 59, 101-123.
183.
*ThauS.AquinoK.WittekR. (2007). An extension of uncertainty management theory to the self: The relationship between justice, social comparison orientation, and antisocial work behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 250-258.
184.
ThauS.BennettR. J.MitchellM. S.MarrsM. B. (2009). How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: An uncertainty management theory perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 79-92.
185.
ThibautJ.WalkerL. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
186.
*ThompsonM.HeronP. (2005). The difference a manager can make: Organizational justice and knowledge worker commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 383-404.
187.
*TremblayM.SireB.PelchatA. (1998). A study of the determinants and of the impact of flexibility on employee benefit satisfaction. Human Relations, 51, 667-688.
*TylerT. R.De CremerD. (2005). Process-based leadership: Fair procedures and reactions to organizational change. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 529-545.
190.
TylerT. R.LindE. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 115-191). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
191.
TylerT. R.LindE. A.HuoY. J. (2000). Cultural values and authority relations: The psychology of conflict resolution across cultures. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 6, 1138-1163.
192.
Van de VijverF.FischerR. (2009). Improving methodological robustness in cross-cultural organizational research. In BhagatR. S.SteersR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of culture, organizations, and work (pp. 491-517). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
193.
Van de VijverF.LeungK. (1997). Methods and data analysis of comparative research. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
194.
Van den NoortgateW.OnghenaP. (2001). Multi-level meta-analysis: A comparison with traditional meta-analytical procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63, 765-790.
195.
*Van YpreneN. W.AndreasJ. (2002). Extra-rolgedrag van werknemers: De rol van procedurele rechtvaardigheid, individualisme-collectivisme, en ervaren reikwijdte van het takenpakket [Extra-role behavior among employees: The role of procedural justice, individualism-collectivism, and perceived job breadth]. Gedrag en Organisatie, 15, 42-51.
196.
WeissD. J.DawisR. V.EnglandG. W.LofquistL. H. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
197.
*WongY.NgoH.WongC. (2002). Affective organizational commitment of workers in Chinese joint ventures. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17, 580-598.
198.
*WongY.NgoH.WongC. (2006). Perceived organizational justice, trust, and OCB: A study of Chinese workers in joint ventures and state-owned enterprises. Journal of World Business, 41, 344-355.
199.
World Bank. (2008). World development report. Washington, DC: Author.
200.
*XiaoweiG. (2006). Power distance as the moderator of the relationship between justice perception and OCB: An experimental research. Psychological Science (China), 29, 433-436.
201.
*XiaoweiG.ChengyanL. (2005). Impression management as the predictor of OCB: An experimental research. Psychological Science (China), 28, 480-482.
202.
*XieY.XiaoA.RenX.ShiK. (2007). Procedural justice, job satisfaction and organizational commitment: Mediating role of job insecurity. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 15, 138-141.
203.
*YangJ.MossholderK. W.PengT. K. (2007). Procedural justice climate and group power distance: An examination of cross-level interaction effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 681-692.
204.
*YoonJ.ThyeS. R. (2002). A dual process model of organizational commitment—Job satisfaction and organizational support. Work and Occupations, 29, 97-124.
