The aim of this article is to test the hypothesis that mobile or predominantly mobile societies have a lower ratio of average house floor area to average household size. The analysis is performed on a cross-cultural sample consisting of 11 mobile and 35 sedentary cases. The research hypothesis is supported by the data, and the result is significant in two ways. First, it contributes to general anthropological understanding of relationships between cultural variables. Second, it has implications for demographic reconstructions in archaeology as it provides more specific information for converting observed house floor areas into population size and average household size estimates.
BakerP. T.SandersW. T. (1972). Demographic Studies in anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 1, 151-178.
2.
BinfordL. R. (1990). Mobility, housing, and environment: A comparative study. Journal of Anthropological Research, 46, 119-152.
3.
BinfordL. R. (2001). Constructing frames of reference: An analytical method for the archaeological use of hunter-gatherer and environmental data sets. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
4.
BlantonR. E. (1994). Houses and households: A comparative study. New York, NY: Plenum.
5.
BoserupE. (1965). The conditions of agricultural growth. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
6.
BoserupE. (1976). Environment, population, and technology in primitive societies. Population and Development Review, 2, 21-36.
7.
BoydR.RichersonP. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
BrownB. M. (1987). Population estimation from floor area: A restudy of “Naroll’s constant.”Cross-Cultural Research, 21, 1-49.
9.
CarneiroR. L. (1962). Scale analysis as an instrument for the study of cultural evolution. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 18, 149-169.
10.
CarneiroR. L. (1970). A theory of the origin of the state. Science, 169, 733-738.
11.
CarneiroR. L. (1986). On the relationship between size of population and complexity of social organization. Journal of Anthropological Research, 42, 355-364.
12.
CasselberryS. E. (1974). Further refinement of formulae for determining population from floor area. World Archaeology, 6, 117-122.
13.
ChamberlainA. T. (2006). Demography in archaeology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
CookS. F.HeizerR. F. (1965). The quantitative approach to the relation between population and settlement size. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
15.
CowgillG. L. (1975). Causes and consequences of ancient and modern population changes. American Anthropologist, 77, 505-525.
16.
DewarR. E. (1984). Environmental productivity, population regulation, and carrying capacity. American Anthropologist, 86, 601-614.
17.
DiehlM. W. (1992). Architecture as a material correlate of mobility strategies: Some implications for archeological interpretation. Cross-Cultural Research, 26, 1-35.
18.
DohmK. (1990). Effect of population nucleation on house size for pueblos in the American Southwest. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 9, 201-239.
19.
DrennanR. D.DaiX. (2010). Chiefdoms and states in the Yuncheng Basin and the Chifeng region: A comparative analysis of settlement systems in North China. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 29, 455-468.
20.
EmberM. (1963). The relationship between economic and political development in nonindustrialized societies. Ethnology, 2, 228-248.
21.
FeinmanG. M. (2011). Size, complexity, and organizational variation: A comparative approach. Cross-Cultural Research, 45, 37-58.
22.
HassanF. A. (1978). Demographic archaeology. In SchifferM. B. (Ed.), Advances in archaeological method and theory (Vol. 1, pp. 49-103). New York, NY: Academic.
23.
HenrichJ. (2004). Demography and cultural evolution: How adaptive cultural processes can produce maladaptive losses: The Tasmanian case. American Antiquity, 69, 197-214.
24.
JohnsonA. W.EarleT. (2000). The evolution of human societies: From foraging group to agrarian state. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
25.
JohnsonG. A. (1982). Organizational structure and scalar stress. In RenfrewC.RowlandsM.SegravesB. (Eds.), Theory and explanation in archaeology (pp. 389-421). New York, NY: Academic.
26.
KlineM. A.BoydR. (2010). Population size predicts technological complexity in Oceania. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B series, Biological sciences, 277, 2559-2564.
27.
KojićB. (1973). Seoska arhitektura i rurizam: teorija i elementi. [Rural architecture and rural settlement planning: theory and elements]. Beograd, Serbia: Građevinska knjiga.
28.
KolbC. C. (1985). Demographic estimates in archaeology: Contributions from ethnoarchaeology on Mesoamerican peasants. Current Anthropology, 26, 581-599.
29.
KosseK. (1990). Group size and societal complexity: Thresholds in the long-term memory. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 9, 275-303.
30.
KosseK. (1994). The evolution of large, complex groups: A hypothesis. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 13, 35-50.
31.
KramerC. (1982). Ethnographic households and archaeological interpretation: A case from Iranian Kurdistan. American Behavioral Scientist, 25, 663-675.
32.
LeBlancS. (1971). An addition to Naroll’s suggested floor area and settlement population relationship. American Antiquity, 36, 210-211.
33.
McGuireR. H.SchifferM. B. (1983). A theory of architectural design. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 2, 277-303.
34.
MurdockG. P. (1967). Ethnographic atlas. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
35.
MurdockG. P.WhiteD. R. (1969). Standard cross-cultural sample. Ethnology, 8, 329-369.
36.
NarollR. (1962). Floor area and settlement population. American Antiquity, 27, 587-589.
PeregrineP. N.EmberC. R.EmberM. (2004a). Universal patterns in cultural evolution: An empirical analysis using Guttman scaling. American Anthropologist, 106, 145-149.
39.
PeregrineP. N.EmberM.EmberC. R. (2004b). Predicting the future state of the world using archaeological data: An exercise in archaeomancy. Cross-Cultural Research, 38, 133-146.
40.
ReadD. Â. W.LeBlancS. Â. A. (2003). Population growth, carrying capacity, and conflict. Current Anthropology, 44, 59-85.
41.
RichersonP. J.BoydR. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42.
SchachtR. M. (1980). Two models of population growth. American Anthropologist, 82, 782-798.
43.
SchachtR. M. (1981). Estimating past population trends. Annual Review of Anthropology, 10, 119-140.
44.
ShennanS. (2000). Population, culture history, and the dynamics of culture change. Current Anthropology, 41, 811-835.
45.
ShennanS. (2001). Demography and cultural innovation: A model and its implications for the emergence of modern human culture. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 11, 5-16.
46.
ShennanS. (2002). Genes, memes and human history: Darwinian archaeology and cultural evolution. London, UK: Thames & Hudson.
47.
SteeleJ. (2010). Radiocarbon dates as data: Quantitative strategies for estimating colonization front speeds and event densities. Journal of Archaeological Science, 37, 2017-2030.
48.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. London, UK: SAGE.
49.
WiessnerP. (1974). A functional estimator of population from floor area. American Antiquity, 39, 343-350.
50.
WilkR. R.RathjeW. L. (1982). Household archaeology. American Behavioral Scientist, 25, 617-639.
51.
WoodJ. W. (1998). A theory of preindustrial population dynamics: Demography, economy, and well-being in Malthusian systems. Current Anthropology, 39, 99-135.
