In examining the pattern of status-related behavior in the United States and Japan, the authors compared perceptions of verbal and nonverbal behaviors of lower and higher status people in asymmetric dyadic interaction using 105 behavioral scales. A similar gap was found between perceptions of behavior of lower and higher status people in both cultures, suggesting that this status-related behavior follows a fundamental pattern probably common across cultures. Nevertheless, culture appears to affect the magnitude at which status-related behavior is manifested. In Japan, a hierarchical, collectivist, tight, and high-context culture, the authors found perceptions of greater differences in the behavior of lower and higher status people than in the United States, a more egalitarian, individualist, and low-context culture. The sources and implications of this general pattern of status-related behavior and its cross-cultural differences are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 303-314.
2.
Berger, J., Rosenholtz, S. J., & Zelditch, M. (1980). Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 479-508.
3.
Butcher, J. N. (1996). Translation and adaptation of the MMPI-2 for international use. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), International adaptations of the MMPI-2: Research and clinical applications (pp. 26-43). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
4.
Butcher, J. N., & Han, K. (1996). Methods of establishing cross-cultural equivalence. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), International adaptations of the MMPI-2: Research and clinical applications (pp. 44-63). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
5.
Cattell, R. B. (1966). The Scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 245-251.
6.
Ekman, P. (1976). Movements with precise meanings. Journal of Communication, 26, 14-26.
7.
Ellyson, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1985). Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior: Basic concepts and issues. In S. L. Ellyson & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 1-27). New York: Springer-Verlag.
8.
Gudykunst, W. B., & Nishida, T. (1993). Interpersonal and intergroup communication in Japan and the United States. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Communication in Japan and the United States (pp. 149-214). Albany: State University of New York Press.
9.
Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
10.
Hall, E. T. (1983). The dance of life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
11.
Hall, J. A. (1996). Touch, status, and gender at professional meetings. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20, 23-44.
12.
Heslin, R., & Alper, T. (1983). Touch: A bonding gesture. In J. M. Wiemann & R. P. Harrison (Eds.), Nonverbal interaction (pp. 47-75). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
Hofstede, G. (1983). Japanese work-related values in a global perspective. In H. Mannari & H. Befu (Eds.), The challenge of Japan's internationalization: Organization and culture (pp. 148-169). Nishinomiya, Japan: Kwansai Gakuin University.
15.
Krauss, R. M., Chen, Y., & Chawla, P. (1996). Nonverbal behavior and nonverbal communication: What do conversational hand gestures tell us? In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 389-450). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
16.
Lott, D. F., & Sommer, R. (1967). Sitting arrangements and status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 90-95.
17.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implication for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
18.
Mitchell, G., & Maple, T. L. (1985). Dominance in nonhuman primates. In S. L. Ellyson & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 49-66). New York: Springer-Verlag.
19.
Morsbach, H. (1973). Aspects of nonverbal communication in Japan. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 157, 262-277.
20.
Natale, M., Entin, E., & Jaffee, J. (1979). Vocal interruptions in dyadic communication as a function of speech and social anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 865-878.
21.
Packwood, W. T. (1974). Loudness as a variable in persuasion. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 21, 1-2.
22.
Patterson, M. L. (1983). Nonverbal behavior: A functional perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.
23.
Pelto, P. J. (1968, April). The difference between “tight” and “loose” societies. Transaction, 5, 37-40.
24.
Reischauer, E. O. (1988). The Japanese today: Change and continuity. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
25.
Sorrentino, R. M., & Boutillier, R. G. (1975). The effect of quantity and quality of verbal interaction on ratings of leadership ability. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 11, 403-411.
26.
Sússman, N. M., & Rosenfeld, H. M. (1982). Influence of culture, language, and sex on conversational distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 66-74.
27.
Thurstone, L. L. (1947). Multiple factor analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview.
29.
Walker, J. W., & Borden, R. J. (1976). Sex, status, and the invasion of shared space. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 7, 28-34.
