A significant portion of the working population faces economic injustices, precarious work, and exclusion from career development opportunities. Despite the growing scholarly concern for precarious workers, previous studies have pointed out the need for broader conceptualizations of what positive work experiences represent for them because individuals strive for work that provides a sense of worth and dignity in addition to minimal conditions. Building on the Dignity at Work Framework, the present study aimed to investigate dignity at work among paid domestic cleaning (PDC) workers in Switzerland, identify the strategies, resources, and hindrances to secure or enhance favorable conditions, and report participants’ propositions for improving their working conditions. We analyzed four focus groups with 15 PDC workers using Consensual Qualitative Research analysis. Results show a diversity of experiences on a continuum ranging from dignity to indignity at work. Workers employed various strategies, from resignation and demanding adaptation to more resistant responses to dignity threats. Moreover, PDC workers showed critical consciousness at various stages by proposing pragmatic changes, increased contextual support, or more liberatory aspirations and actions. Our findings contribute to bridging precarious work literature with precarity and dignity research and help adapt policies and counseling interventions for precarious workers.
AfonsoA.VisserJ. (2014). The liberal road to high employment and low inequality? The Dutch and Swiss social models in the crisis. In DølvikJ. E.MartinA. (Eds.), European social models from crisis to crisis (pp. 214–245). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198717966.003.0007
2.
AhmedA.LiangD.AnjumM. A.DurraniD. K. (2023). Does dignity matter? The effects of workplace dignity on organization-based self-esteem and discretionary work effort. Current Psychology, 42(6), 4732–4743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01821-5
3.
AliS. R.DrustupD.GarrisonY. L.MahatmyaD. (2022). Economic justice and vocational psychology: Towards community change. Journal of Career Assessment, 30(3), 436–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727211069535
4.
AllanB. A.AutinK. L.Wilkins-YelK. G. (2021). Precarious work in the 21st century: A psychological perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 126, 103491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103491
5.
AllanB. A.BlusteinD. L. (2022). Precarious work and workplace dignity during COVID-19: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 136, 103739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103739
6.
AreguinM. A.StewartA. J. (2022). Latina farmworkers’ experiences: Maintaining dignity in an oppressive workplace. Gender, Work and Organization, 29(4), 988–1007. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12788
7.
BakerS. J.LucasK. (2017). Is it safe to bring myself to work? Understanding LGBTQ experiences of workplace dignity. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 34(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1439
BaruaP.HaukanesH. (2020). Organizing for empowerment: Exploring the impact of unionization on domestic workers in India. Studies in Comparative International Development, 55(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-019-09291-4
10.
BlusteinD. L.AllanB. A. (2024). Dignity at work: A critical conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Career Assessment, 33(3), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727241283685
11.
BlusteinD. L.GrzankaP. R.GordonM.SmithC. M.AllanB. A. (2024). The psychology of precarity: A critical framework. American Psychologist, 80(5), 757–770. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001361
12.
BlusteinD. L.LysovaE. I.DuffyR. D. (2023). Understanding decent work and meaningful work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 289–314. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031921-024847
13.
BlusteinD. L.OlleC.Connors-KellgrenA.DiamontiA. J. (2016). Decent work: A psychological perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 407. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00407
14.
BonvinJ.-M.LoveyM.RosensteinE.KempeneersP. (2021). Social policies put to the test by the pandemic: Food banks as an indicator of the inadequacies of contemporary labour markets and social policies. In PomatiM.JollyA.ReesJ. (Eds.), Social policy review 33: Analysis and debate on social policy, 2021 (pp. 95–114). Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447359739.ch005
15.
BorgesA.GreveM.MassoudiK. (2024). An investigation of work precarity among paid domestic cleaning workers in Switzerland. Journal of Career Assessment, 33(3), 569–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727241287534
16.
BorgesA.GreveM.MassoudiK. (2025). The road to precarious work: Studying paid domestic cleaning workers’ career trajectories. Journal of Counseling Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000840
17.
BosmansK.MousaidS.De CuyperN.HardonkS.LouckxF.VanroelenC. (2016). Dirty work, dirty worker? Stigmatisation and coping strategies among domestic workers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.11.008
18.
CadenasG. A.McWhirterE. H. (2022). Critical consciousness in vocational psychology: A vision for the next decade and beyond. Journal of Career Assessment, 30(3), 411–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727221086553
19.
CarrerasL. (2008). Travailleuses domestiques « sans papier » en Suisse: Comment s’en sortir, rester et résister. Nouvelles Questions Feministes, 27(2), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.3917/nqf.272.0084
CrowhurstI. (2013). The fallacy of the instrumental gate? Contextualising the process of gaining access through gatekeepers. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(6), 463–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2013.823282
22.
CruzS. A.AbrantesM. (2014). Service interaction and dignity in cleaning work: How important is the organizational context?Employee Relations, 36(3), 294–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-06-2013-0064
23.
Di BelgiojosoB.OrtensiL. E. (2019). Satisfied after all? Working trajectories and job satisfaction of foreign-born female domestic and care workers in Italy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(13), 2527–2550. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1465401
24.
DuffyR. D.BlusteinD. L.DiemerM. A.AutinK. L. (2016). The psychology of working theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(2), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000140
25.
DuqueT.AcerosJ. C.PalomaV. (2023). Sociopolitical development of female migrant domestic workers in Southern Spain: A qualitative study of a pathway against injustice. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 33(2), 454–468. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2613
26.
GarrisonY. L.CadenasG. A.AliS. R. (2024a). A framework of community-engaged vocational research methodologies from liberatory perspectives. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 149, 103970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2024.103970
27.
GarrisonY. L.HerJ. E.KimT.KimH. J. (2024b). Vocational experiences of Korean women with a high school diploma: Insights into work precarity and social marginalization. Journal of Career Assessment, 33(2), 344–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727241266937
28.
GibsonC.ThomasonB.MargolisJ.GrovesK.GibsonS.FranczakJ. (2023). Dignity inherent and earned: The experience of dignity at work. The Academy of Management Annals, 17(1), 218–267. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2021.0059
29.
Gonzalez-FranceseR.FuncastaL.BoggioK.AmableM. (2021). The formalization of paid domestic work in Uruguay and Argentina: Lessons and challenges to public health. Saude e Sociedade, 30(4), Article e191008. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902021191008
30.
HillC. E. (2012). Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena. American Psychological Association.
31.
HillC. E.KnoxS.ThompsonB. J.WilliamsE. N.HessS. A.LadanyN. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: An update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.196
32.
HillC. E.ThompsonB. J.WilliamsE. N. (1997). A guide to conducting consensual qualitative research. The Counseling Psychologist, 25(4), 517–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000097254001
HodziM. B.AnnorF.DarkwahE. (2021). An exploration of work-related experiences of domestic workers in Accra, Ghana. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 36(4), 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/15555240.2021.1941068
ILO. (2021). Making decent work a reality for domestic workers: Progress and prospects ten years after the adoption of the domestic workers convention, 2011 (No. 189). International Labour Office.
37.
ILO. (2023). The road to decent work for domestic workers. International Labour Office.
JokelaM. (2019). Patterns of precarious employment in a female-dominated sector in five welfare states the case of paid domestic labor sector. Social Politics, 26(1), 30–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxy016
40.
Kanagui-MuñozM.GarriottP. O.FloresL. Y.ChoS.GrovesJ. (2012). Latina/o food industry employees’ work experiences: Work barriers, facilitators, motivators, training preferences, and perceptions. Journal of Career Development, 39(1), 118–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845311400412
41.
Karunakaran PrasannaC.Divakara BhatL.Bevinje SubbyamoolaS.Moolan JosephS. (2023). Dignity and human rights violations at the workplace: Intersectional vulnerability of women domestic workers in India. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 9(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-023-00280-1
42.
KeelingM. E.OzunaS. M.KintzleS.CastroC. A. (2019). Veterans’ civilian employment experiences: Lessons learnt from focus groups. Journal of Career Development, 46(6), 692–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845318776785
43.
KhanM. H.WilliamsJ.WilliamsP.MayesR. (2023). Caring in the gig economy: A relational perspective of decent work. Work, Employment & Society, 38(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170231173586
44.
KruegerR. A.CaseyM. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
45.
Leigh‐OsrooshK. T.ClemonsK.RobertsonA.PlaceresV.GayJ.Lopez‐PerryC.MasonE. C.IevaK. P.LaneE. M. D.SaundersR. (2023). Antiracist school counseling: A consensual qualitative study. Journal of Counseling and Development, 101(3), 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12477
46.
LevittH. M. (2025). Attending to investigator reflexivity and epistemic privilege: A worksheet for facilitating individual and research team self-reflection. Qualitative Psychology, 12(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000331
47.
LevittH. M.BambergM.CreswellJ. W.FrostD. M.JosselsonR.Suárez-OrozcoC. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA publications and communications board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151
48.
LucasK. (2011). Blue-collar discourses of workplace dignity: Using outgroup comparisons to construct positive identities. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(2), 353–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318910386445
49.
LucasK. (2015). Workplace dignity: Communicating inherent, earned, and remediated dignity. Journal of Management Studies, 52(5), 621–646. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12133
50.
MadillA.JordanA.ShirleyC. (2000). Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: Realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. British Journal of Psychology, 91(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712600161646
51.
MasdonatiJ.SchreiberM.MarcionettiJ.RossierJ. (2019). Decent work in Switzerland: Context, conceptualization, and assessment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 12–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.11.004
52.
McWha-HermannI.BlusteinD. L.SeubertL.WildeJ.AllanB. A.SearleR. H.SeubertC. (2024). Tackling precarious work through work and organizational psychology: It’s work but not as we know it. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 34, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2024.2433489
53.
MertzB. A.LocanderJ. A.BrownB. W.LocanderW. B. (2024). Dignity in the workplace: A frontline service employee perspective. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 32(4), 506–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2023.2221443
54.
MorrowS. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250
55.
MurphyE. C.OeschD. (2018). Is employment polarisation inevitable? Occupational change in Ireland and Switzerland, 1970–2010. Work, Employment & Society, 32(6), 1099–1117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017017738944
56.
MurrayA. J.DurrheimK.DixonJ. (2022). Everyday dehumanization: Negative contact, humiliation, and the lived experience of being treated as ‘less than human’. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(3), 1050–1066. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12524
57.
NoronhaE.ChakrabortyS.D’CruzP. (2020). ‘Doing dignity work’: Indian security guards’ interface with precariousness. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(3), 553–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3996-x
OeschD.RiegerA. (2006). Minimum wage policy via collective bargaining: The Swiss trade unions’ minimum wage campaign. In SchultenT.BispinckR.SchäferC. (Eds.), Minimum wages in Europe (pp. 273–298). European Trade Union Institute.
60.
PonterottoJ. G. (2005). Qualitative research in counseling psychology: A primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.126
61.
RabeloV. C.MahalingamR. (2019). “They really don’t want to see us”: How cleaners experience invisible ‘dirty’ work. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 113, 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.010
62.
RestubogS. L. D.SchilpzandP.LyonsB.Midel DeenC.HeY. (2023). The vulnerable workforce: A call for research. Journal of Management, 49(7), 2199–2207. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231177446
63.
RibeiroM. A.TeixeiraM. A. P.AmbielR. A. M. (2019). Decent work in Brazil: Context, conceptualization, and assessment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 112, 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.03.006
64.
StaceyC. L. (2005). Finding dignity in dirty work: The constraints and rewards of low-wage home care labour. Sociology of Health & Illness, 27(6), 831–854. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00476.x
65.
State for Economic Affaires, SECO. (2024). Informations sur le CTT économie domestique, situation au 1er Janvier 2024. State Secretariat for Economic Affairs. file:///Users/aolivei5/Desktop/Hauswirtschaft_29_11_2023_fr.pdf.
66.
SultanaR. G. (2023). For a postcolonial turn in career guidance: The dialectic between universalisms and localisms. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 51(2), 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2020.1837727
67.
ThomasB.LucasK. (2019). Development and validation of the workplace dignity scale. Group & Management Organization, 44(1), 72–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601118807784
68.
TiltonJ.LucasK.Kish-GephartJ. J.KentJ. K. (2024). Enduring, strategizing, and rising above: Workplace dignity threats and responses across job levels. Journal of Business Ethics, 195(2), 353–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05672-5
ValenzuelaF.ManolchevC.BöhmS.AgarC. C. (2023). Working through (mis)recognition: Understanding vulnerability as ambivalence in precarious worker subjectivity. Human Relations, 77(10), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267231186261
71.
WattsR. J.GriffithD. M.Abdul-AdilJ. (1999). Sociopolitical development as an antidote for oppression; theory and action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27(2), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022839818873
72.
WilhelmyA.KöhlerT. (2022). Qualitative research in work and organizational psychology journals: Practices and future opportunities. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 31(2), 161–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.2009457
WrzesniewskiA.DuttonJ. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179. https://doi.org/10.2307/259118
75.
YorkeL.GilliganR.AlemuE. (2022). Moving towards empowerment? Rural female migrants negotiating domestic work and secondary education in urban Ethiopia. Gender, Place & Culture, 31(6), 749–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2022.2164560
76.
ZhangG.WangH.LiM. (2023). “A little thanks changes my world”: When and why dirty work employees feel meaningfulness at work. Journal of Business Research, 163, 113913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113913
77.
ZulfiqarG.PrasadA. (2022). How is social inequality maintained in the Global South? Critiquing the concept of dirty work. Human Relations, 75(11), 2160–2186. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267221097937
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
