The longstanding underrepresentation of women in engineering fields is a global issue. The present study explores the experiences of 15 Korean women who earned engineering degrees and then changed their careers to non-engineering fields. Participants completed semi-structured interviews, and qualitative data from these interviews were analyzed using consensual qualitative research methods. Five domains emerged from the data: psychosocial struggles, anticipated difficulties in engineering, systemic gender marginalization, perceived lack of support, and deciding to leave. These findings reveal the underlying dynamics of environmental, socio-cognitive, and affective factors that not only influence non-persistence but also shape women’s experiences of leaving engineering and navigating alternative career paths. Participants’ decisions to leave were influenced by structural and cultural barriers, such as gender discrimination, anticipated challenges as women, and limited opportunities for advancement. The results highlight the need for gender-inclusive culture, supportive environments, and meaningful representation to improve retention and equity for women in engineering. This study offers important implications for practice and research in supporting women in engineering and advancing gender diversity within the field.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice Hall, 2.
3.
BrittonD. M. (2017). Beyond the chilly climate: The salience of gender in women’s academic careers. Gender & Society, 31(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243216681494
4.
BuseK.BilimoriaD.PerelliS. (2013). Why they stay: Women persisting in US engineering careers. Career Development International, 18(2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-11-2012-0108
5.
Byars-WinstonA.RogersJ. G.BranchawJ.PribbenowC. M.HankeR.PfundC. (2018). New measures assessing predictors of academic persistence for historically underrepresented racial/ethnic undergraduates in science. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 17(3), ar50. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-08-0183
6.
CadaretM. C.HartungP. J.SubichL. M.WeigoldI. K. (2017). Stereotype threat as a barrier to women entering engineering careers. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 99, 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.12.002
7.
ChanA.RottmannC.MooreE.RadebeD. (2022). Who identifies as an engineering leader? Exploring influences of gender, race, and professional experience. In ASEE 2022 Annual Conference Proceedings.American Society for Engineering Education, Minneapolis, MN, 26–29June2022. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--41852
8.
CheryanS.ZieglerS. A.MontoyaA. K.JiangL. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000052
9.
DennehyT. C.DasguptaN. (2017). Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(23), 5964–5969. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613117114
10.
FernandoD.CohenL.DuberleyJ. (2018). What helps? Women engineers’ accounts of staying on. Human Resource Management Journal, 28(3), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12192
11.
FloresL. Y.NavarroR. L.LeeB. H.HuX.DiazD.MartinezL. (2021). Social cognitive predictors of Latinx and White engineering students’ academic satisfaction and persistence intentions: Exploring interactions among social identities and institutional context. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 127(3), Article 103580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103580
12.
FloresL. Y.NavarroR. L.LeeH. S.LunaL. L. (2014). Predictors of engineering-related self-efficacy and outcome expectations across gender and racial/ethnic groups. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 20(2), 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2014007902
13.
FloresL. Y.TroykaM.LeeJ. (2023). Building program structures to advance vocational research on women. The Counseling Psychologist, 51(6), 869–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/00110000231175194
14.
FouadN. A.ChangW. H.WanM.SinghR. (2017). Women’s reasons for leaving the engineering field. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00875
15.
FouadN. A.KozlowskiM. B.SinghR.LinnemanN. G.SchamsS. S.WeberK. N. (2020). Exploring the odds: Gender differences in departing the engineering profession. Journal of Career Assessment, 28(3), 446–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072719876892
16.
FouadN. A.SinghR.CappaertK.ChangW. H.WanM. (2016). Comparison of women engineers who persist in or depart from engineering. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92(3), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.11.002
17.
GladstoneJ. R.CimpianA. (2021). Which role models are effective for which students? A systematic review and four recommendations for maximizing the effectiveness of role models in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00315-x
18.
GregorM.DunnM.Campbell-HalfakerD.Martin-FernandezJ.FerrerA.RobinsonS. (2023). Plugging the leaky pipeline: A qualitative investigation of untenured female faculty in STEM. Journal of Career Development, 50(2), 425–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/08948453221101588
19.
HillC. E. (Ed.), (2012). Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena. American Psychological Association.
20.
JungE.KimJ. Y. E. (2020). Women in engineering: Almost no gap at university but a long way to go for sustaining careers. Sustainability, 12(20), 8299. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208299
KimM. S.YangJ. W.YonK. J. (2016). Qualitative research on career choices and graduate program experience of female graduate students in Science and Engineering. Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 28(1), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.23844/kjcp.2016.02.28.1.191
23.
KimY.LeeH. S. (2024). Group differences in the structural relationships of efficacy, emotion, and interpersonal influence on female students’ career aspirations based on the proportion of female faculty in engineering majors. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 31(4), 85–115. https://doi.org/10.21509/KJYS.2024.04.31.4.85
Korean Ministry of Science and ICT. (2023). 2021 report on the status of women in science, engineering, and technology. Korea Foundation for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology.
26.
LeeH. S.FloresL. Y.NavarroR. L.Kanagui-MuñozM. (2015). A longitudinal test of social cognitive career theory’s academic persistence model among Latino/a and White men and women engineering students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88, 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.02.003
27.
LeeH. S.FloresL. Y.NavarroR. L.SuhH. N. (2018). Development and validation of the negative outcome expectations scale in engineering (NOES-E). Journal of Career Assessment, 26(1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072716679923
28.
LeeN.LeeH. S. (2019). The structural relations of engineering students perceived career barrier, engineering self-efficacy and academic persistence across gender. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 26(8), 231–258. https://doi.org/10.21509/kjys.2019.08.26.8.231
29.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.HackettG. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
30.
LentR. W.MillerM. J.SmithP. E.WatfordB. A.LimR. H.HuiK. (2016). Social cognitive predictors of academic persistence and performance in engineering: Applicability across gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 94, 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.02.012
31.
LinC.DeemerE. D. (2021). Stereotype threat and career goals among women in STEM: Mediating and moderating roles of perfectionism. Journal of Career Development, 48(5), 569–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845319884652
32.
MartinezA.ChristnachtC. (2024). Women making gains in STEM occupations but still underrepresented. U.S. Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov
33.
NavarroR. L.FloresL. Y.LeeH. S.GonzalezR. (2014). Testing a longitudinal social cognitive model of intended persistence with engineering students across gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(1), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.05.007
34.
NavarroR. L.FloresL. Y.LegerskiJ.-P.BrionezJ.MayS. F.SuhH. N.SlivenskyD. R.TapioF.LeeH.-S.GarriottP. O.HuntH. K.DesjarlaisC. D.LeeB.-H.DiazD.ZhuJ.JungA.-K. (2019). Social cognitive predictors of engineering students’ academic persistence intentions, satisfaction, and engagement. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(2), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000319
SettlesI. H.JonesM. K.BuchananN. T.BrasselS. T. (2022). Epistemic exclusion of women faculty and faculty of color: Understanding scholar (ly) devaluation as a predictor of turnover intentions. The Journal of Higher Education, 93(1), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2021.1914494
39.
ShiangL. S.NgoE. (2020). Unconscious and unseen barriers: A gender study of Malaysian women engineers. In International journal of communication, management and humanities AID conference proceedings (pp. 108–117).
WilliamsE. N.HillC. E. (2012). Establishing trustworthiness in consensual qualitative research. In HillC. E. (Ed.), Consensual qualitative research: A practical resource for investigating social science phenomena (pp. 69–80). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13720-005
43.
YonK. J.YangJ. W.LeeJ. S.JangA. K.KimJ. K. (2013). Differences in perceived career barriers by gender and affiliation (undergraduate, graduate): A study focusing on a science and engineering university. The Korean Journal of Woman Psychology, 18(2), 295–316.
