Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study examined the measurement invariance (MI) of the Planning for Career and Family Scale (PLAN; Ganginis Del Pino et al., 2013), originally developed to assess career and family planning decisions for women college students, across a diverse sample of engineering students. Using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with a sample of 1,454 engineering students, the PLAN scale was refined from 24 to 21 items by removing three cross-loading items. Subsequent testing of one-factor, two-factor, and bifactor structural models suggested that the bifactor model fits best to the data, aligning with existing literature, and thus was used as the baseline model for subsequent MI testing. We used two methods to test the MI of the 21-item bifactor PLAN model across gender, race/ethnicity, intersections of gender and race/ethnicity, and academic years. Results of the two methods revealed mixed results on the levels of invariance, with scalar invariance across academic years supported by one method. Latent mean comparisons indicated significant differences in career and family planning intentions between sophomores and seniors. These findings validate the PLAN scale’s applicability across diverse student groups, emphasizing its utility in informing educational policies and programs tailored to support varied career and family planning needs among engineering students.

Keywords

planning for career and family scale career and family planning measurement invariance engineering education college students

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abele

A. E.

Spurk

(2011). The dual impact of gender and the influence of timing of parenthood on men’s and women’s career development: Longitudinal findings. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35(3), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025411398181

Arnold

H. J.

Feldman

D. C.

(1981). Social desirability response bias in self-report choice situations. Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 377–385. https://doi.org/10.2307/255848

Barnett

R. C..

Gareis

K. C.

Boone James

Steele

(2003). Planning ahead: College seniors' concerns about career-marriage conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62(2), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00028-3

Betz

N. E.

(2008). Women’s career development. In Denmark

F. L.

Paludi

M. A.

(Eds.), Psychology of women: A handbook of issues and theories (2nd ed., pp. 717–752): Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group.

Bowen

N. K.

Masa

R. D.

(2015). Conducting measurement invariance tests with ordinal data: A guide for social work researchers. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 6(2), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1086/681607

Bravo

E. I.

Stephens

D. P.

(2023). Resistir: Hispanic undergraduate STEM majors’ perceptions of barriers and supports toward degree persistence. Journal of Latinx Psychology, 11(2), 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/lat0000223

Brito

(2023). College career balance: Understanding the college-to-career transition of Latinx first-generation college students (order No. 30635536). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/college-career-balance-understanding-transition/docview/2869116087/se-2

Brown

T. A.

(2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.

Buse

Bilimoria

Perelli

(2013). Why they stay: Women persisting in US engineering careers. Career Development International, 18(2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-11-2012-0108

10.

Byrne

B. M.

Stewart

S. M.

(2006). Teacher’s corner: The macs approach to testing for multigroup invariance of a second-order structure: A walk through the process. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(2), 287–321. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1302_7

11.

Chen

C. C.

Lau

J. M.

Richardson

G. B.

Dai

C. L.

(2020). Measurement invariance testing in counseling. Journal of Professional Counseling, Practice, Theory, and Research, 47(2), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/15566382.2020.1795806

12.

Chen

(2015). STEM attrition among high-performing college students: Scope and potential causes. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 5(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.136

13.

Cinamon

R. G.

(2006). Anticipated work-family conflict: Effects of gender, self-efficacy, and family background. The Career Development Quarterly, 54(3), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2006.tb00152.x

14.

Creed

P. A.

Blume

(2013). Compromise, well-being, and action behaviors in young adults in career transition. Journal of Career Assessment, 21(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072712453830

15.

De Hauw

Greenhaus

J. H.

(2015). Building a sustainable career: The role of work–home balance in career decision making. In Handbook of research on sustainable careers (pp. 223–238). Edward Elgar Publishing.

16.

Dewsbury

B. M.

Taylor

Reid

Viamonte

(2019). Career choice among first-generation, minority STEM college students. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 20(3), 20. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v20i3.1775

17.

Diekman

A. B.

Brown

E. R.

Johnston

A. M.

Clark

E. K.

(2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, Technology, engineering, and Mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1051–1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610377342

18.

Dimitrov

D. M.

(2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43(2), 121–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175610373459

19.

Eby

L. T.

Casper

W. J.

Lockwood

Bordeaux

Brinley

(2005). Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980 –2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(1), 124–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.11.003

20.

Eccles

(2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520902832368

21.

Farmer

H. S.

(1997). Women’s motivation related to mastery, career salience, and career aspiration: A multivariate model focusing on the effects of sex role socialization. Journal of Career Assessment, 5(4), 355–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/106907279700500401

22.

Ferriman

Lubinski

Benbow

C. P.

(2009). Work preferences, life values, and personal views of top math/science graduate students and the profoundly gifted: Developmental changes and gender differences during emerging adulthood and parenthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(3), 517–532. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016030

23.

Flores

L. Y.

Navarro

R. L.

Lee

B. H.

Diaz

Martinez

(2021). Social cognitive predictors of Latinx and White engineering students’ academic satisfaction and persistence intentions: Exploring interactions among social identities and institutional context. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 127, Article 103580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103580

24.

Flores

L. Y.

Navarro

R. L.

Lee

H.-S.

Luna

L. L.

(2014). Predictors of engineering-related self-efficacy and outcome expectations across gender and racial/ethnic groups. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 20(2), 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2014007902

25.

Fouad

N. A.

Byars-Winston

A. M.

(2005). Cultural context of career choice: Meta-analysis of race/ethnicity differences. The Career Development Quarterly, 53(3), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2005.tb00992.x

26.

Fouad

N. A.

Chang

W. H.

Wan

Singh

(2017). Women’s reasons for leaving the engineering field. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 875. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00875

27.

Fouad

N. A.

Singh

Cappaert

Chang

W.-h.

Wan

(2016). Comparison of women engineers who persist in or depart from engineering. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.11.002

28.

Fricker

R. D.

Schonlau

(2002). Advantages and disadvantages of Internet research surveys: Evidence from the literature. Field Methods, 14(4), 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/152582202237725

29.

Frome

P. M.

Alfeld

C. J.

Eccles

J. S.

Barber

B. L.

(2006). Why don’t they want a male dominated job? An investigation of young women who changed their occupational aspirations. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610600765786

30.

Gaffey

A. R.

Rottinghaus

P. J.

(2009). The factor structure of the work-family conflict multidimensional scale: Exploring the expectations of college students. Journal of Career Assessment, 17(4), 495–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072709340662

31.

Ganginis Del Pino

H. V.

O'Brien

K. M.

Mereish

Miller

M. J.

(2013). “Leaving before she leaves”: Considering future family when making career plans. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 60(3), 462–470. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032651

32.

Gottfredson

L. S.

(1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28(6), 545–579. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.28.6.545

33.

Greenhaus

J. H.

Beutell

N. J.

(1985). Sources and conflict between work and family roles. The Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/258214

34.

Gregor

M. A.

Del Pino

H. V. G.

Gonzalez

Soto

Dunn

M. G.

(2020). Understanding the career aspirations of diverse community college students. Journal of Career Assessment, 28(2), 202–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072719849872

35.

Gregor

M. A.

O’Brien

K. M.

(2015). The changing face of psychology: Leadership aspirations of female doctoral students. The Counseling Psychologist, 43(8), 1090–1113. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000015608949

36.

Gregor

M. A.

O'Brien

K. M.

(2016). Understanding career aspirations among young women: Improving instrumentation. Journal of Career Assessment, 24(3), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072715599537

37.

Harren

V. A.

(1979). A model of career decision making for college students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(79)90065-4

38.

L.-t.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

39.

Jean

V. A.

Payne

S. C.

Thompson

R. J.

(2015). Women in STEM: Family-related challenges and initiatives. In Mills

M. J.

(Ed.), Gender and the work-family experience: An intersection of two domains (pp. 291–311). Springer International Publishing/Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08891-4_15

40.

Jelks

S. M.

Crain

A. M.

(2020). Sticking with STEM: Understanding STEM career persistence among STEM bachelor’s degree holders. The Journal of Higher Education, 91(5), 805–831. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2019.1700477

41.

Junk

K. E.

Armstrong

P. I.

(2010). Stability of career aspirations: A longitudinal test of Gottfredson’s theory. Journal of Career Development, 37(3), 579–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845309350921

42.

Kachchaf

Hodari

Ong

(2015). Career–life balance for women of color: Experiences in science and engineering academia. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 8(3), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039068

43.

Kim

M. H.

Beier

M. E.

(2020). The college-to-career transition in STEM: An eleven-year longitudinal study of perceived and objective vocational interest fit. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 123, Article 103506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103506

44.

Lee

Wessel

J. L.

(2022). Is feminist identity beneficial for women’s career aspirations? Examining feminist identity profiles. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 46(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211055445

45.

Lefever

Dal

Matthíasdóttir

Á.

(2007). Online data collection in academic research: Advantages and limitations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), 574–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00638.x

46.

Legewie

DiPrete

T. A.

(2014). The high school environment and the gender gap in science and engineering. Sociology of Education, 87(4), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040714547770

47.

Lent

R. W.

Brown

S. D.

Hackett

(1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027

48.

Lent

R. W.

Miller

M. J.

Smith

P. E.

Watford

B. A.

Hui

Lim

R. H.

(2015). Social cognitive model of adjustment to engineering majors: Longitudinal test across gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 86, 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.11.004

49.

Lent

R. W.

Miller

M. J.

Smith

P. E.

Watford

B. A.

Lim

R. H.

Hui

Morrison

M. A.

Wilkins

Williams

(2013). Social cognitive predictors of adjustment to engineering majors across gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(1), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.02.006

50.

(2014). The performance of MLR, USLMV, and WLSMV estimation in structural regression models with ordinal variables (Order No. 3620406). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/performance-mlr-uslmv-wlsmv-estimation-structural/docview/1538039469/se-2

51.

López

E.J.

Basile

Landa-Posas

Ortega

Ramirez

(2019). Latinx students’ sense of familismo in undergraduate science and engineering. The Review of Higher Education, 43(1), 85–111. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0091

52.

Luong

Flake

J. K.

(2023). Measurement invariance testing using confirmatory factor analysis and alignment optimization: A tutorial for transparent analysis planning and reporting. Psychological Methods, 28(4), 905–924. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000441

53.

Milkie

M. A.

Peltola

(1999). Playing all the roles: Gender and the work-family balancing act. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(2), 476–490. https://doi.org/10.2307/353763

54.

Navarro

R. L.

Flores

L. Y.

Lee

H.-S.

Gonzalez

(2014). Testing a longitudinal social cognitive model of intended persistence with engineering students across gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(1), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.05.007

55.

Navarro

R. L.

Flores

L. Y.

Legerski

J.-P.

Brionez

May

S. F.

Suh

H. N.

Slivensky

D. R.

Tapio

Lee

H.-S.

Garriott

P. O.

Hunt

H. K.

Desjarlais

C. D.

Lee

B.-H.

Diaz

Zhu

Jung

A.-K.

(2019). Social cognitive predictors of engineering students’ academic persistence intentions, satisfaction, and engagement. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(2), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000319

56.

Novakovic

Fouad

N. A.

(2013). Background, personal, and environmental influences on the career planning of adolescent girls. Journal of Career Development, 40(3), 223–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845312449380

57.

Ojeda

Navarro

R. L.

Morales

(2011). The role of la familia on Mexican American men's college persistence intentions. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 12(3), 216–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020091

58.

Price

(2010). The effect of instructor race and gender on student persistence in STEM fields. Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 901–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.07.009

59.

Putnick

D. L.

Bornstein

M. H.

(2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004

60.

Radcliffe Public Policy Center . (2000). Life’s work: Generational attitudes toward work and life integration. Harvard University, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study.

61.

R Core Team . (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

62.

Sáinz

Fàbregues

Rodó-de-Zárate

Martínez-Cantos

J.-L.

Arroyo

Romano

M.-J.

(2020). Gendered motivations to pursue male-dominated STEM careers among Spanish young people: A qualitative study. Journal of Career Development, 47(4), 408–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845318801101

63.

Sass

D. A.

Schmitt

T. A.

Marsh

H. W.

(2014). Evaluating model fit with ordered categorical data within a measurement invariance framework: A comparison of estimators. Structural Equation Modeling, 21(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.882658

64.

Savela

A. E.

O’Brien

K. M.

(2016). Predicting college women’s career plans: Instrumentality, work, and family. Journal of Career Development, 43(4), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845315602118

65.

Saw

Chang

C.-N.

Chan

H. Y.

(2018). Cross-sectional and longitudinal disparities in STEM career aspirations at the intersection of gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Educational Researcher, 47(8), 525–531. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18787818

66.

Sayer

L. C.

Fine

(2011). Racial-ethnic differences in U.S. married women’s and men’s housework. Social Indicators Research, 101(2), 259–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9645-0

67.

Scarborough

W. J.

Sin

Risman

(2019). Attitudes and the stalled gender revolution: Egalitarianism, traditionalism, and ambivalence from 1977 through 2016. Gender & Society, 33(2), 173–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243218809604

68.

Schmitt

Kuljanin

(2008). Measurement invariance: Review of practice and implications. Human Resource Management Review, 18(4), 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2008.03.003

69.

Sonnert

Holton

G. J.

(1995). Who succeeds in science? The gender dimension. Rutgers University Press.

70.

Sparks

D. M.

Przymus

S. D.

Silveus

De La Fuente

Cartmill

(2023). Navigating the intersectionality of race/ethnicity, culture, and gender identity as an aspiring Latina STEM student. Journal of Latinos and Education, 22(4), 1355–1371. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2021.1958332

71.

Svetina

Rutkowski

(2020). Multiple-group invariance with categorical outcomes using updated guidelines: An illustration using Mplus and the lavaan/semTools packages. Structural Equation Modeling, 27(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1602776

72.

Tan-Wilson

Stamp

(2015). College students’ views of work-life balance in STEM research careers: Addressing negative preconceptions. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 14(3), es5. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-11-0210

73.

Tsaousides

Jome

(2008). Perceived career compromise, affect and work-related satisfaction in college students. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(2), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.04.003

74.

Vandenberg

R. J.

Lance

C. E.

(2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002

75.

Wee

(2014). Compromises in career-related decisions: Examining the role of compromise severity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61(4), 593–604. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000037

76.

Westring

A. F.

Ryan

A. M.

(2011). Anticipated work–family conflict: A construct investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(2), 596–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.02.004

77.

Widaman

K. F.

Reise

S. P.

(1997). Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. In Bryant

K. J.

Windle

West

S. G.

(Eds.), The science of prevention (pp. 281–324). American Psychological Association.

78.

Estabrook

(2016). Identification of Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models of Different Levels of Invariance for Ordered Categorical Outcomes. Psychometrika, 81(4), 1014–1045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-016-9506-0

79.

Yogman

Garfield

C. F.

Committee On Psychosocial Aspects Of Child And Family Health . (2016). Fathers’ roles in the care and development of their children: The role of pediatricians. Pediatrics, 138(1), Article e20161128. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1128

Examining Measurement Invariance of the Planning for Career and Family Scale (PLAN) Across Race/Ethnicity,Gender,and College Year Among Engineering College Students

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References