The present study examined the relationship between problem-solving appraisal (problem-solving inventory), various personality styles (Myers–Briggs Type Indicator), and learning strategies. Specifically, it was hypothesized that problem solving appraisal would mediate, fully or partially, the relationship between personality styles and learning strategies. A total of 577 Italian adolescents (187 boys and 390 girls), aged 17–19 years, were involved. Results obtained confirmed that problem-solving appraisal was a significant mediator of the relationship between personality styles and learning strategies. These results have important implications for practice and underscore that specific problem-solving training may improve critical learning strategies for Italian youth with extroversion, intuition, thinking, and judgment personality styles.
AccordinoM. P.RosenthalD. A.FreundR. (2000). Effects of treatment participation on quality of life of elders with serious mental disability. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 23, 353–358. doi:10.1037/h0095144
2.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:0.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
3.
BoyleG. J. (1995). Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI): Some psychometric limitations. Australian Psychologist, 30, 71–74. doi:10.1111/j.1742-9544.1995.tb01750.x
4.
ChipmanS. F.SegalJ. W.GlaserR. (Eds.). (2013). Thinking and learning skills: Vol. 2: Research and open questions. London, England: Routledge.
5.
CohenJ. (1983). The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 249–53. doi:10.1177/014662168300700301
6.
CohenJ. J. (2008). Learning styles of Myers-Briggs type indicator (Master Thesis). Terre Haute: Indiana State University.
7.
ContiG. J.McNeilR. C. (2011). Learning strategy preference and personality type: Are they related?Journal of Adult Education, 40, 1–8.
8.
D’ZurillaT. J.Maydeu-OlivaresA.Gallardo-PujolD. (2011). Predicting social problem solving using personality trait. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 142–147. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.015
9.
D’ZurillaT. J.NezuA. M. (2007). Problem-solving therapy: A positive approach to clinical intervention (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Spring.
10.
DiTiberioJ. K.HammerA. L. (1993). Introduction to type in college. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
FerrariL.NotaL.SoresiS.HeppnerP. P.HeppnerM. J. (2012, 8). Problem-solving training as an intervention with at-risk youth. Poster session presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Orlando, FL.
13.
GewertzC. (2007). ‘Soft skills’ in big demand. Education Week, 40, pp. 25–27.
14.
HeppnerP. P. (1988). The problem-solving inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
15.
HeppnerP. P.BakerC. E. (1997). Applications of the problem solving inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 29, 229–441.
16.
HeppnerP. P.BaumgardnerA. H.LarsonL. M.PettyR. E. (1988). The utility of problem-solving training that emphasizes self-management principles. Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 1, 129–143. doi:10.1080/09515078808254196
17.
HeppnerP. P.WangY. (2003). Problem-solving appraisal. In LopezS. J.SnyderC. R. (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (pp. 127–138). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18.
HeppnerP. P.WeiM.NevilleH. A.Kanagui-MunozM. (2013). A cultural and contextual model of coping and health. In LeongF.Comas-DiazL.HallG. N.McLoydV.TrimbleJ. (Eds.), APA handbook of multicultural psychology (pp. 83–105). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19.
HeppnerP. P.WittyT. E.DixonW. A. (2004). Problem-solving appraisal and human adjustment: A review of 20 years of research utilizing the problem solving inventory [Major contribution]. The Counseling Psychologist, 32, 344–428.
20.
HicksL. E. (1985). Is there a disposition to avoid the fundamental attribution error?Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 436–456.
JungC. G. (1971). Psychological types. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
KochanskaG.AksanN.PriscoT. R.AdamsE. E. (2008). Mother-child and father-child mutually responsive orientation in the first two years and children's outcomes at preschool age: Mechanisms of influence. Child Development, 79, 30–44. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01109.x
24.
KuipersB. S.HiggsM. J.TolkachevaN. V.de WitteM. C. (2009). The influence of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator profiles on team development processes an empirical study in the manufacturing industry. Small Group Research, 40, 436–464. doi:10.1177/1046496409333938
25.
MacKinnonD. P. (2000). Contrasts in multiple mediator models. In RoseJ. S.ChassinL.PressonC. C.ShermanS. J. (Eds.), Multivariate applications in substance use research: New methods for new questions (pp. 141–160). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26.
MacKinnonD. P.FritzM. S.WilliamsJ.LockwoodC. M. (2007). Distribution of the product confidence limits for the indirect effect: Program PRODCLIN. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 384–389.
27.
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.HoffmanJ. M.WestS. G.SheetsV. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83
28.
MyersI.McCaulleyM.QuenkN. L.HammerA. L. (1998). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
29.
MupingaD. M.NoraR. T.YawD. C. (2006). The Learning Styles, Expectations, and Needs of Online Students. College Teaching, 54(1), 185–189.
30.
NotaL.GinevraM. C.SantilliS.SoresiS. (2014). Contemporary career construction: The role of career adaptability. In CoetzeeM. (Ed.), Perspectives on psycho-social career meta-capacities: Dynamics of contemporary career development (pp. 248–263). New York, NY: Springer.
31.
NotaL.HeppnerP. P.SoresiS.HeppnerM. J. (2009). Examining cultural validity of the problem-solving inventory (PSI) in Italy. Journal of Career Assessment, 17, 478–494. doi:10.1177/1069072709339490
32.
NotaL.SoresiS.ZimmermanB. J. (2004). Self-regulation and academic achievement and resilience: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 198–215. doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2005.07.001
33.
O’NeilJ. M. (2004). Response to Heppner, Witty, and Dixon: Inspiring and high-level scholarship that can change people’s lives. The Counseling Psychologist, 32, 1–11. doi:10.1177/0011000003262796
34.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731.
35.
RossmanA. D. (1993). Managing hands-on inquiry. Science and Children, 31, 35–37.
36.
RossierJ.ZeccaG.StaufferS. D.MaggioriC.DauwalderJ.-P. (2012). Career Adapt-Abilities Scale in a French-speaking Swiss sample: Psychometric properties and relationships to personality and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80, 734–743. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2012.01.004
37.
SagginoA. (Ed.). (1989). Versione italiana del Manuale del test Myers-Briggs Type Indicator [Italian version of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Manual]. Firenze, Italy: Edizioni Organizzazioni Speciali.
38.
SolbergV. S. H. (2010). Gli studenti più impegnati sono quelli che vantano un più alto rendimento: aprire “autostrade per il successo” affinchè tutti gli student realizzino il loro vero potenziale [Engaged students are high performing students: paving success highways for all Students to achieve their true potential]. In NotaL.SoresiS. (Eds.), Sfide e nuovi orizzonti per l’orientamento [Challenges and new horizons for the vocational guidance] (pp. 283–291). Firenze, Italy: Giunti O.S.
39.
SoresiS. (2000). Tests for vocational guidance—Magellano. Firenze, Italy: ITER-Organizzazioni Speciali.
40.
SoresiS.MirandolaM. (1998). Adattamento italiano del Problem Solving Inventory
[Italian adaptation of Problem Solving Inventory]. Firenze, Italy: Giunti-Organizzazioni Speciali.
41.
SoresiS.NotaL.FerrariL. (2005). Counseling for adolescents and children at risk in Italy. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 27, 249–265.
42.
ThomasL. (1995). The use of second-order factor analysis in psychological research. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Psychological Association, San Antonio, TX.
43.
TinajeroC.LemosS. M.AraújoM.FerracesM. J.PáramoM. F. (2012). Cognitive style and learning strategies as factors which affect academic achievement of Brazilian university students. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 25, 105–113.
44.
TinsleyH. E. A.TinsleyD. J. (1987). Uses of factor analysis in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 414–424.
45.
TruchE. (2001). Managing personal knowledge: The key to tomorrow's employability. Journal of Change Management, 2, 102–105.
WheelwrightJ. B.WheelwrightJ. H.BuehlerA. (1964). Jungian type survey: The Grey-Wheelwright test manual. San Francisco, CA: Society of Jungian Analysts of Northern California.
48.
WigginsJ. S. (1992). Review of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. In KramerJ. J.ConoleyJ. C. (Eds.), Mental measurements yearbook (pp. 537–539). Lincoln: University of Nebraska.
49.
Yazzie-MintzE. (2007). Voices of students on engagement: A report on the 2006 high school survey of student engagement. Bloomington, IN: Center for Evaluation and Education Policy.
50.
ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. H. (2007). Motivation: An essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In SchunkD. H.ZimmermanB. J. (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 1–30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
