The present study examines whether vocational interests, measured by Holland’s RIASEC model, and objectively assessed cognitive abilities, were useful in discriminating among various major categories for a sample of 1990 German university students. Interests and specific abilities, in combination, significantly discriminated among major categories and furthermore, ability measures added incremental validity to prediction based on interest measures alone. Logistic regression analyses revealed significant differences in predictor importance between women and men. Furthermore, overall gender differences in interests and cognitive abilities were identifiable within major categories as well. Implications for career counseling are discussed.
AchterJ. A.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P.Eftekhari-SanjaniH. (1999). Assessing vocational preferences among gifted adolescents adds incremental validity to abilities: A discriminant analysis of educational outcomes over a 10-year interval. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 777–786.
2.
AckermanP. L. (1996). A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence, 22, 227–257.
3.
AckermanP. L.HeggestadE. D. (1997). Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 219–245.
4.
AllenJ.RobbinsS. (2008). Prediction of college major persistence based on vocational interests and first-year academic performance. Research in Higher Education, 49, 62–79.
5.
AllenJ.RobbinsS. (2010). Effects of interest–major congruence, motivation, and academic performance on timely degree attainment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 23–35.
6.
ArmstrongP. I.FouadN. A.RoundsJ.HubertL. (2010). Quantifying and interpreting group differences in interest profiles. Journal of Career Assessment, 18, 115–132.
7.
ArmstrongP. I.VogelD. L. (2009). Interpreting the interest–efficacy association from a RIASEC perspective. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 392–407.
8.
AssoulineM.MeirE. I. (1987). Meta-analysis of the relationship between congruence and well-being measures. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 319–332.
9.
AustinJ. T.HanischK. A. (1990). Occupational attainment as a function of abilities and interests: A longitudinal analysis using project TALENT data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 77–86.
10.
BeauducelA.KerstingM. (2002). Fluid and crystallized intelligence and the Berlin model of intelligence structure (BIS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18, 97–112.
11.
BenbowC. P.LubinskiD.SheaD. L.Eftekhari-SanjaniH. (2000). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability at age 13: Their status 20 years later. Psychological Science, 11, 474–480.
12.
BergmannC.EderF. (2005). Allgemeiner Interessen-Struktur-Test mit Umwelt-Struktur-Test (AIST-R/UST-R)[General Interest Structure Test and Environmental Structure Test–Revision]. Göttingen: Beltz Test.
13.
BudescuD. V. (1993). Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 542–551.
14.
Cohen-BendahanC. C. C.van de BeekC.BerenbaumS. A. (2005). Prenatal sex hormone effects on child and adult sex-typed behavior: Methods and findings. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 29, 353–384.
15.
CronbachL. J. (1949). Essentials of psychological testing. Oxford, England: Harper.
16.
DawisR. V. (1992). The individual differences tradition in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 7–19.
17.
FeldmanK. A.SmartJ. C.EthingtonC. A. (1999). Major field and person-environment fit: Using Holland's theory to study change and stability of college students. Journal of Higher Education, 70, 642–669.
18.
FouadN. A.MohlerC. J. (2004). Cultural validity of Holland's theory and the strong interest inventory for five racial/ethnic groups. Journal of Career Assessment, 12, 423–439.
19.
FurnhamA. (2001). Self-estimates of intelligence: Culture and gender difference in self and other estimates of both general (g) and multiple intelligences. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 1381–1405.
20.
GottfredsonL. S. (2003). The challenge and promise of cognitive career assessment. Journal of Career Assessment, 11, 115–135.
21.
HailerA. (2004). Entwicklung eines Fragebogens zur Erfassung verschiedener Aspekte der Studienwahlreife zum Zwecke der strukturierten Studienberatung. [Development of an instrument for assessing distinct aspects of career maturation for career counseling.] (Unpublished manuscript). University of Hohenheim, Germany.
22.
HalpernD. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
23.
HarmonL. W.HansenJ. C.BorgenF. H.HammerA. L. (1994). Applications and technical guide for the strong interest inventory. Palo Alto, CA: CA Consulting.
24.
HellB.PäßlerK. (2011). Are occupational interests hormonally influenced? The 2D:4D-interest nexus. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 376–380.
25.
HellB.PäßlerK.SchulerH. (2009). Was-studiere-ich.de: Konzept, Nutzen und Anwendungsmöglichkeiten. [Was-studiere-ich.de: Concept, benefit, and application.]Zeitschrift für Studium und Beratung, 4, 9–14.
26.
HirschiA. (2009). Development and criterion validity of differentiated and elevated vocational interests in adolescence. Journal of Career Assessment, 17, 384–401.
27.
HirschiA.LägeD. (2007). Holland's secondary constructs of vocational interests and career choice readiness of secondary students: Measures for related but different constructs. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 205–218.
28.
HollandJ. L. (1959). A theory of vocational choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 6, 35–45.
29.
HollandJ. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments(3rd Ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
30.
HumphreysL. G.LubinskiD.YaoG. (1993). Utility of predicting group membership and the role of spatial visualization in becoming an engineer, physical scientist, or artist. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 250–261.
31.
HumphreysL. G.YaoG. (2002). Prediction of graduate major from cognitive and self-report test scores obtained during the high school years. Psychological Reports, 90, 3–30.
32.
JägerA. O. (1982). Mehrmodale Klassifikation von Intelligenzleistung: Experimentell kontrollierte Weiterentwicklung eines deskriptiven Intelligenzstrukturmodells [Multimodal classification of intelligence tests: Experimentally controlled development of a descriptive model of intelligence structure]. Diagnostica, 28, 195–225.
33.
JägerA. O. (1984). Intelligenzstrukturforschung: Konkurrierende Modelle, neue Entwicklungen, Perspektiven [Research on intelligence structure: Competing models, new developments, perspectives]. Psychologische Rundschau, 35, 21–35.
34.
JohnsonJ. W. (2000). A heuristic method for estimating the relative weight of predictor variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35, 1–19.
35.
KlineP. (2000). The handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
36.
LarsonL. M.WeiM.WuT.BorgenF. H.BaileyD. C. (2007). Discriminating among educational majors and career aspirations in Taiwanese undergraduates: The contribution of personality and self-efficacy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54, 395–408.
37.
LarsonL. M.WuT.BaileyD. C.BorgenF. H.GasserC. E. (2010). Male and female college students’ college majors: The contribution of basic vocational confidence and interests. Journal of Career Assessment, 18, 16–33.
38.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.HackettG. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122.
39.
LubinskiD. (2004). Introduction to the special section on cognitive abilities: 100 years after Spearman's (1904) ''general intelligence,' objectively determined and measured'. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 96–111.
40.
LubinskiD. (2010). Neglected aspects and truncated appraisals in vocational counseling: Interpreting the interest–efficacy association from a broader perspective: Comment on Armstrong and Vogel (2009). Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 226–238.
41.
LunneborgC. E.LunneborgP. W. (1975). College major similarity profiles based on selected Washington pre-college measures and vocational interest inventory scores. Educational Assessment Center Report 76-10. Seattle: University of Washington.
42.
MinerC. U.OsborneW. L.JaegerR. M. (1997). The ability of career maturity indicators to predict interest score differentiation, consistency, and elevation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 29, 187–201.
43.
PäßlerK.HellB. (2010, September). Studienerfolgsprognose: Not much more than g [Predicting academic success: Not much more than g?]?Paper presented at the Meeting of the German Society of Psychology, Bremen, Germany.
44.
PatrickL.CareE.AinleyM. (2011). The relationship between vocational interests, self-efficacy, and achievement in the prediction of educational pathways. Journal of Career Assessment, 19, 61–74.
45.
PorterS. R.UmbachP. D. (2006). College major choice: An analysis of person-environment fit. Research in Higher Education, 47, 429–449.
46.
RoundsJ. B.TraceyT. J. (1990). From trait-and-factor to person-environment fit counseling: Theory and process. In OsipowS. H. (Ed.), Career counseling: Contemporary topics in vocational psychology. (pp. 1–44). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
47.
SchiefeleU.KrappA.WintelerA. (1992). Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: A meta-analysis of research. In RenningerK. A.HidiS. (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 183–212). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
48.
SchmidtD. B.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (1998). Validity of assessing educational–vocational preference dimensions among intellectually talented 13-year-olds. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 436–453.
49.
SeymourE.HewittN. M. (1997). Talking about leaving. Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
50.
SheaD. L.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 604–614.
51.
SteigerJ. H.FouladiR. T. (1992). R2: A computer program for interval estimation, power calculation, and hypothesis testing for squared multiple correlation. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 4, 581–582.
52.
SuR.RoundsJ.ArmstrongP. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 859–884.
53.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th Ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
54.
TraceyT. G.HopkinsN. (2001). Correspondence of interests and abilities with occupational choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(2), 178–189.
55.
TraceyT. J. G.RobbinsS. B. (2006). The interest-major congruence and college success relation: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69, 64–89.
56.
TraceyT. J. G.RoundsJ. (1999). Inference and attribution errors in test interpretation. In GoodyearR. K.LichtenbergJ. W. (Eds.), Scientist-practitioner perspectives on test interpretation (pp. 113–131). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
57.
TranbergM.SlaneS.EkebergS. E. (1993). The relation between interest congruence and satisfaction: A metaanalysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 253–264.
58.
TsabariO.TzinerA.MeirE. I. (2005). Updated meta-analysis on the relationship between congruence and satisfaction. Journal of Career Assessment, 13, 216–232.
59.
WaiJ.LubinskiD.BenbowC. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 817–835.
60.
WebbR. M.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2002). Mathematically facile adolescents with math-science aspirations: New perspectives on their educational and vocational development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 785–794.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
