This study examined evidence for the use of the Strong Interest Inventory with diverse populations, including examination of the structure of interests across five racial/ethnic groups, finding similarity in perceptions of the world of work. The study also studied differences in means for the General Occupational Themes and Basic Interest Scales as well as assessed differences in consistency and differentiation across five racial/ethnic groups for career clients. Overall, the pattern of results suggests minimal differences based on racial/ethnic group membership but more meaningful group differences based on gender.
Brewer, C. A., & Suchan, T. A. (2001). Mapping Census 2000: The geography of U. S. diversity. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
2.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2002). 2002 occupational employment statistics. Retrieved June 2002 from http://www.bls.gov
3.
Carson, A. D., & Mowsesian, R. (1993). Moderators of the prediction of job satisfaction from congruence: A test of Holland’s theory. Journal of Career Assessment, 1, 130-144.
4.
Carter, R. T., & Swanson, J. L. (1990). The validity of the Strong Interest Inventory with Black Americans: A review of the literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 36, 195-209.
5.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analyses for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Davison Aviles, R. M., & Spokane, A. R. (1999). The vocational interests of Hispanic, African American, and Caucasian middle school students. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 32, 138-148.
7.
Day, S. X., & Rounds, J. (1998). Universality of vocational interest structure among racial and ethnic minorities. American Psychologist, 53, 728-736.
8.
Day, S. X., Rounds, J., & Swaney, K. (1998). The structure of vocational interests for diverse racialethnic groups. Psychological Science, 9, 40-44.
9.
Fouad, N. A. (2002). Cross-cultural differences in vocational interests: Between-group differences on the Strong Interest Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 282-289.
10.
Fouad, N. A., Harmon, L. W., & Borgen, F. H. (1997). Structure of interests in employed male and female members of U.S. racial-ethnic minority and nonminority groups. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 339-345.
11.
Fouad, N. A., Harmon, L. W., & Hansen, J. C. (1994). Cross-cultural use of the Strong. In L. W. Harmon, J. C. Hanson, F. H. Borgen, & A. C. Hammer (Eds.), Strong Interest Inventory: Applications and technical guide (pp. 255-280), Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
12.
Harmon, L. W., Hansen, J. C., Borgen, F. H., & Hammer, A. L. (Eds.). (1994). Strong Interest Inventory: Applications and technical guide. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
13.
Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
14.
Hubert, L., & Arabie, P. (1987). Evaluating order hypotheses within proximity matrices. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 172-178.
15.
Lattimore, R. R., & Borgen, F. H. (1999). Validity of the 1994 Strong Interest Inventory with racial and ethnic minority groups in the United States. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 185-195.
16.
Leong, F. T. L., Austin, J. T., Sekaran, U., & Komarraju, M. (1998). An evaluation of the crosscultural validity of Holland’s theory: Career choices by workers in India. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52, 441-455.
17.
Leung, S. A., Ivey, D., & Suzuki, L. (1994). Factors affecting the career aspirations of Asian Americans. Journal of Counseling and Development, 72, 404-410.
18.
Monahan, C. J. (1987). Construct validation of a modified differentiation index. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 30, 217-226.
19.
National Research Council. (1999). Changing nature of work: Implications for occupational analysis. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science.
20.
Park, S. E., & Harrison, A. A. (1995). Career-related interests and values, perceived control, and acculturation of Asian-American and Caucasian-American college students. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1184-1203.
21.
Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1996). Computing contrasts, effect sizes, and counternulls on other people’s published data: General procedures for research consumers. Psychological Methods, 1, 331-340.
22.
Sackett, S. A., & Hansen, J. C. (1995). Vocational outcomes of college freshman with flat profiles on the Strong Interest Inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 28, 9-24.
23.
Strahan, R. F. (1987). Measures of consistency for Holland-type codes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 37-44.
24.
Sue, D. W., & Kirk, B. A. (1972). Differential characteristics of Japanese-American and Chinese-American college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 20, 142-148.
25.
Sue, D. W., & Kirk, B. A. (1973). Psychological characteristics of Chinese-American students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 9, 471-478.
26.
Swanson, J. L., & Gore, P. A., Jr. (2000). Advances in vocational psychology theory and research. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of counseling psychology (3rd ed., pp. 233-269). New York: John Wiley.
27.
Thompson, B. (2002). “Statistical,” “practical,” and “clinical”: How many kinds of significance do counselors need to consider?Journal of Counseling & Development, 80, 64-71.
28.
Tracey, T. G. (1997). RANDALL: A Microsoft Fortran program for a randomization test of hypothesized order relations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 164-168.
29.
Vacha-Haase, T., & Nilsson, J. E. (1998). Statistical significance reporting: Current trends and uses in MECD. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 31, 46-57.
30.
Walsh, W. B., & Betz, N. E. (2001). Tests and assessment (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
