Cross-cultural validation of Holland's theory typically focuses on the structural validity of the RIASEC model. This study not only examined structural validity, but the conceptual equivalence of RIASEC and the criterion-related validity of Holland's theory, based on college students from the major ethnic group in United States (White Americans) and Singapore (Chinese). Values were used to examine the convergent-discriminant validity and equivalence of meaning of RIASEC. Results indicate similar structural and criterion-related validity across the samples, although the figures were generally lower than those found in previous studies. Values were weakly related to the interest types. Some evidence of weak convergent validity was found for the I, S, and E types. Tests on these three types indicated that there was equivalence of meaning for the S and E types and the possibility of some culture-specific meaning attached to the I type. Implications for future research are discussed.
Bentler, P.M., & Chou, C. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 78-117.
2.
Blake, R.J., & Sackett, S.A. (1999). Holland's typology and the five-factor model: A rational-empirical analysis. Journal of Career Assessment , 7, 249-279.
3.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
Day, S.X., & Rounds, J. (1998). Universality of vocational interest structure among racial and ethnic minorities. American Psychologist , 53, 728-736.
5.
Farh, J-L., Leong, F.T.L., & Law, K.S. (1998). Cross-cultural validity of Holland's model in Hong Kong. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52, 425-440.
6.
Fouad, N.A., Harmon, L.W., & Borgen, N.H. (1997). Structure of interests in employed male and female members of U.S. racial-ethnic minority and nonminority groups. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 339-345.
7.
Gottfredson, G.D., & Holland, J.L. (1996). Dictionary of Holland Occupational Codes (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
8.
Harris, M.M., & Schaubroeck, J. (1991). Confirmatory modeling in organizational behavior/human resource management: Issues and applications . Journal of Management, 16, 337-360.
9.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10.
Holland, J.L. (1959). A theory of vocational choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 6, 35-45.
11.
Holland, J.L. (1973). Making vocational choices: A theory of careers . Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
12.
Holland, J.L. (1985a). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall .
13.
Holland, J.L. (1985b). Manual for the Vocational Preference Inventory . Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
14.
Holland, J.L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall .
Hubert, L., & Arabie, P. (1987). Evaluating order hypotheses within proximity matrices . Psychological Bulletin, 102, 172-178.
17.
Hui, C.H., & Triandis, H.C. (1985). Measurement in cross-cultural psychology: A review and comparison of strategies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16, 131-152.
18.
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command languageChicago: Scientific Software.
19.
Knapp-Lee, L.J. (1996). Use of the COPES, a measure of work values, in career assessment. Journal of Career Assessment, 4, 429-443.
20.
Kruskal, J.B., & Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
Leong, F.T.L. (1997). Cross-cultural career psychology: Comment on Fouad, Harmon, and Borgen (1997) and Tracey, Watanabe, and Schneider (1997. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 355-359.
22.
Leong, F.T.L., & Brown, M. (1995). Theoretical issues in cross-cultural career development: Cultural validity and cultural specificity. In W. B. Walsh & S. H. Osipow (Eds.), Handbook of vocational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 143-180). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
Leong, F.T.L., Austin, J.T., Sekaran, U., & Komarraju, M. (1998). An evaluation of the cross-cultural validity of Holland's theory: Career choices by workers in India. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52, 441-455.
24.
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525-543.
25.
Prediger, D.J. (1982). Dimensions underlying Holland's hexagon: Missing link between interest and occupations? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 21, 259-287.
26.
Reise, S.P., Widaman, K.R., & Pugh, R.H. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 552-566.
27.
Rounds, J., & Tracey, T.J.G. (1996). Cross-cultural structural equivalence of RIASEC models and measures. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 310-329.
28.
Rounds, J., Tracey, T.J.G., & Hubert, L. (1992). Methods for evaluating vocational interest structural hypotheses. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 239-259.
29.
Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the structure and content of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp.1-65). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
30.
Schwartz, S.H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitçibasi , S.-C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 85-119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Soh, S., & Leong, F.T.L. (2000). Cross-cultural validity of vertical and horizontal individualism and collectivism in Singapore: Relationships with values, interests, college majors and organizational preferences. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Swaney, K.B. (1995). Technical manual: Revised unisex edition of the ACT interest inventory (UNIACT. Iowa City, IA: American College Testing.
34.
Tan, E. ( 1998). Research on vocational behavior: The Singapore perspective . Journal of Vocational Behavior, 52, 323-342.
35.
Tokar, D.M., Vaux, A., & Swanson, J.L. (1995). Dimensions relating Holland's vocational personality typology and the five-factor model. Journal of Career Assessment , 3, 57-74.
36.
Tracey, T.J.G. (1997). RANDALL: A microsoft fortran program for a randomization test of hypothesized order relations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 164-168.
37.
Van de Vijver, F.J.R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis of comparative research . In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology, Vol. 1: Theory and method (2nd ed., pp. 257-300). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
38.
Wilkinson, L. (1986). SYSTAT: The System for Statistics. Evanston, IL: SYSTAT.
39.
Yu, J., & Alvi, S.A. (1996). A study of Holland's typology in China. Journal of Career Assessment, 4, 245-252.
