By investigating gendered shopping styles across countries, the authors explore whether the differences between male and female shopping styles are greater than the differences in shopping styles exhibited by consumers across countries. With a conceptual model, this study tests an extant convergence hypothesis that predicts that men and women should grow more similar in their shopping styles as traditional gender-based divisions in wage and domestic labor disappear. The results of a survey of shopping behavior across 11 countries indicate though that men and women are evolutionarily predisposed to different shopping styles. These differences in shopping styles also are greater in countries with higher levels of gender equality. Empathizing, or the ability to tune in to others’ thoughts and feelings, mediates shopping styles more for women; systemizing, or the degree to which a person possesses spatial skills, mediates shopping styles more for men. These results suggest that gender-based retail segmentation is more strategically relevant than country-based segmentation. The authors discuss the implications of their findings for international marketing theory and practice.
AgarwalJamesMalhotraNaresh K.BoltonRuth N. (2010), “A Cross-National and Cross-Cultural Approach to Global Market Segmentation: An Application Using Consumers’ Perceived Service Quality,” Journal of International Marketing, 18 (3), 18–40.
2.
AldenDanna L.SteenkampJan-Benedict E. M.BatraRajeev (2006), “Consumer Attitudes Toward Marketplace Globalization: Structure, Antecedents and Consequences,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23 (3), 227–39.
3.
AshrafAbdul R., Narongsak (Tek) Thongpapanl, and Seigyoung (2014), “The Application of the Technology Acceptance Model under Different Cultural Contexts: The Case of Online Shopping Adoption,” Journal of International Marketing, 22 (3), 68–93.
4.
AskegaardSørenArnouldEric J.KjeldgaardDannie (2005), “Postassimilationist Ethnic Consumer Research: Qualifications and Extensions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (1), 160–70.
5.
BabinBarry J.DardenWilliam R.GriffinMitch (1994), “Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value,” Journal of Consumer Research, 20 (4), 644–56.
6.
BakewellCathyMitchellVincent-Wayne (2004), “Male Consumer Decision-Making Styles,” International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 14 (2), 223–40.
7.
BalabanisGeorgeDiamantopoulosAdamantios (2008), “Brand Origin Identification by Consumers: A Classification Perspective,” Journal of International Marketing, 16 (1), 39–71.
8.
Baron-CohenSimon (2004), The Essential Difference: Men, Women and the Extreme Male Brain. London: Penguin.
9.
Baron-CohenSimonRichlerJenniferBisaryaDherajGurunathanNhishanthWheelwrightSally (2003), “The Systemizing Quotient (SQ): An Investigation of Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High-Functioning Autism, and Normal Sex Differences,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B: Biological Sciences, 358 (1430), 361–74.
10.
BarsalouLawrence W. (2008), “Grounded Cognition,” Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–45.
11.
BemSandra L. (1974), “The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny,” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42 (2), 155–62.
12.
BoltonRuth N.MyersMatthew B. (2003), “Price-Based Global Market Segmentation for Services,” Journal of Marketing, 67 (3), 108–28.
13.
BroomRobert (1933), The Coming of Man: Was It by Accident or Design?London, UK: Witherby.
14.
BurgessSteven M.NyajekaPfavai (2006), “Market Orientation and Performance at the Base of the Pyramid: The Case of Zimbabwean Retailers,” in MSI Reports. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute; 89–115.
15.
ChelminskiPiotrCoulterRobin A. (2007), “The Effects of Cultural Individualism and Self-Confidence on Propensity to Voice: From Theory to Measurement Practice,” Journal of International Marketing, 15 (4), 94–118.
16.
ClevelandMarkLarocheMichaelPapadopoulosNicolas (2009), “Cosmopolitanism, Consumer Ethnocentrism, and Materialism: An Eight-Country Study of Antecedents and Outcomes,” Journal of International Marketing, 17 (1), 116–46.
17.
ClevelandMarkLarocheMichaelPapadopoulosNicolas (2017), “You Are What You Speak? Globalization, Multilingualism, Consumer Dispositions and Consumption,” Journal of Business Research, 68 (3), 542–52.
18.
ClevelandMarkPapadopoulosNicolasLarocheMichael (2011), “Identity, Demographics, and Consumer Behaviors: International Market Segmentation across Product Categories,” International Marketing Review, 28 (3), 244–66.
19.
CohenJoel B.Russell BernardH. (2013), “Evolutionary Psychology and Consumer Behavior: A Constructive Critique,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23 (3), 387–99.
20.
Coskuner-BalliGokcenThompsonCraig J. (2013), “The Status Costs of Subordinate Cultural Capital: At-Home Fathers’ Collective Pursuit of Cultural Legitimacy Through Capitalizing Consumption Practices,” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (1), 19–41.
21.
DawarNirajParkerPhilip (1994), “Marketing Universals: Consumers’ Use of Brand Name, Price, Physical Appearance, and Retailer Reputation as Signals of Product Quality,” Journal of Marketing, 58 (2), 81–95.
22.
DholakiaRubby R.ChiangKuan-Pin (2003), “Shoppers in Cyberspace: Are They from Venus or Mars and Does It Matter?” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13 (1/2), 171–76.
23.
EaglyAlice H.WoodWendy (1999), “The Origins of Sex Differences in Human Behaviour: Evolved Dispositions Versus Social Roles,” American Psychologist, 54 (6), 408–23.
24.
EaglyAlice H.WoodWendy (2013), “The Nature–Nurture Debates 25 Years of Challenges in Understanding the Psychology of Gender,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8 (3), 340–57.
EvanschitzkyHeinerEmrichOliverSangtaniVinitaAckfeldtAnna-LenaReynoldsKristy E.ArnoldMark J. (2014), “Hedonic Shopping Motivations in Collectivistic and Individualistic Consumer Cultures,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 31 (3), 335–38.
27.
FearonJames D. (2003), “Ethnic and Cultural Diversity by Country,” Journal of Economic Growth, 8 (2), 195–222.
28.
GentryJames W.CommuriSurajJunSunkyu (2003), “Review of Literature on Gender in the Family,” Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1 (1), 1–18.
29.
GershunyJonathanSullivanOrielRobinsonJ. (2014), “The Continuing ‘Gender Revolution’ in Housework,” Paper presented at the Perspectives on Time Use in the U.S. Conference, Maryland, June 23–24.
30.
GuoXiaoling (2013), “Living in a Global World: Influence of Consumer Global Orientation on Attitudes Toward Global Brands from Developed Versus Emerging Countries,” Journal of International Marketing, 21 (1), 1–22.
31.
HabimanaE.MasséL. (2000), “Envy Manifestations and Personality Disorders,” European Psychiatry, 15 (1), 15–21.
32.
HafstromJeanne L.ChaeJung S.ChungYoung S. (1992), “Consumer Decision-Making Styles: Comparison Between United States and Korean Young Consumers,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 26 (1), 146–58.
33.
HarnackLisaStoryMaryMartinsonBrianNeumark-SztainerDianneStangJamie (1998), “Guess Who’s Cooking? The Role of Men in Meal Planning, Shopping, and Preparation in US Families,” Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 98 (9), 995–1000.
34.
HerzMarc F.DiamantopoulosAdamantios (2013), “Country-Specific Associations Made by Consumers: A Dual-Coding Theory Perspective,” Journal of International Marketing, 21 (3), 95–121.
35.
HerzMarc F.DiamantopoulosAdamantios (2017), “I Use It But I Will Tell You that I Don’t: Consumers’ Country-of-Origin Cue Usage Denial,” Journal of International Marketing, 25 (2), 52–71.
36.
HiuAliceSiuNoel Y. M.WangCharlie C. L.ChangLudwig M. K. (2001), “An Investigation of Decision-Making Styles of Consumers in China,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35 (2), 326–45.
37.
HofstedeGeert (2003), Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
38.
HofstedeFrenkel T.SteenkampJan-Benedict E. M.WedelMichel (1999), “International Market Segmentation Based on Consumer-Product Relations,” Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (1), 1–17.
39.
InmanJ. JeffreyWinerRussell S.FerraroRosellina (2009), “The Interplay Among Category Characteristics, Customer Characteristics, and Customer Activities on In-Store Decision Making,” Journal of Marketing, 73 (5), 19–29.
KotzéTheunsNorthErnestStolsMarilizeVenterLezanne (2012), “Gender Differences in Sources of Shopping Enjoyment,” International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36 (4), 416–24.
42.
KrautzCarolinHoffmannStefan (2017), “The Tenure-Based Customer Retention Model: A Cross-Cultural Validation,” Journal of International Marketing, 25 (3), 83–106.
43.
LewisMichaelHaviland-JonesJeannette M.BarrettLisa Fieldman (Eds.) (2010), Handbook of Emotions. New York: Guilford Press.
44.
LuceriBeatriceLatusiSabrina (2012), “The Importance of Consumer Characteristics and Market Structure: Variables in Driving Multiple Store Patronage,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19 (5), 519–26.
45.
ManraiLalita A.ManraiAjay K. (1995). “Effects of Cultural-Context, Gender, and Acculturation on Perceptions of Work Versus Social/Leisure Time Usage,” Journal of Business Research, 32 (2), 115–28.
46.
Meyers-LevyJoanLokenBarbara (2015), “Revisiting Gender Differences: What we Know and What Lies Ahead,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25 (1), 129–49.
47.
Meyers-LevyJoanMaheswaranDurairaj (1991), “Exploring Differences in Males’ and Females’ Processing Strategies,” Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (1), 63–70.
48.
MillerGeoffrey (2001), The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature. London: Vintage.
49.
MitchellVincent-WayneWalshGianfranco (2004), “Gender Differences in German Consumer Decision-Making Styles,” Journal of Consumer Behavior, 3 (4), 331–46.
50.
MorgesonForest V.IIISharmaPratyush N.HultG. Tomas M. (2015), “Cross-National Differences in Consumer Satisfaction: Mobile Services in Emerging and Developed Markets,” Journal of International Marketing, 23 (2), 1–24.
51.
NelsonMichelle R.BrunelFrederic F.SupphellenMagneManchandaRajesh V. (2006), “Effects of Culture, Gender, and Moral Obligations on Responses to Charity Advertising Across Masculine and Feminine Cultures,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16 (1), 45–56.
52.
NobleStephanie M.GriffithDavid A.AdjeiMavis T. (2006), “Drivers of Local Merchant Loyalty: Understanding the Influence of Gender and Shopping Motives,” Journal of Retailing, 82 (3), 177–88.
OriansGordon H. (1980), “Habitat Selection: General Theory and Applications to Human Behavior,” in The Evolution of Human Social Behavior, LockardJ.S., ed. Chicago, FL: Elsevier; 49–66.
55.
OrthUlrich R.HolancovaDenisa (2004), “Men’s and Women’s Responses to Sex Role Portrayals in Advertisements,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21 (1), 77–88.
56.
OtnesCeleMcGrathMary Ann (2001), “Perceptions and Realities of Male Shopping Behavior,” Journal of Retailing, 77 (1), 111–37.
57.
Oxford English Dictionary (2015), Oxford: Oxford University Press, (accessed June 15, 2017), http://www.oed.com/.
58.
PapadopoulosNicolasMartínOscar Martin (2011), “International Market Selection and Segmentation: Perspectives and Challenges,” International Marketing Review, 28 (2), 132–49.
59.
PassynKirsten A.DirikerMemoSettleRobert B. (2011), “Images of Online Versus Store Shopping: Have the Attitudes of Men and Women, Young and Old Really Changed?” Journal of Business and Economics Research, 9 (1), 99–110.
60.
PhamMichel T. (2013), “Introduction to Research Dialogue on Evolutionary Psychology and Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23 (3), 349–50.
61.
PhillipsDebby A. (2006), “Masculinity, Male Development, Gender, and Identity: Modern and Postmodern Meanings,” Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 27, 403–23.
62.
PodsakoffPhilipMacKenzieScottJeong-YeonLeePodsakoffNathan (2003), “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 879–903.
63.
RenuEmileHydeKenneth F.LeeMike (2012), “The Product Choices of Young Adult Consumers: Does Gender Matter?” Advances in Consumer Research, 40, 371–78.
64.
RitzerGeorge (2009), Enchanting a Disenchanted World: Continuity and Change in the Cathedrals of Consumption, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
65.
SchmittDavid P. (2012), “When the Difference Is in the Details: A Critique of Zentner and Mitura (2012), ‘Stepping Out of the Caveman’s Shadow: Nations’ Gender Gap Predicts Degree of Sex Differentiation in Mate Preferences’,” Evolutionary Psychology: An International Journal of Evolutionary Approaches to Psychology and Behavior, 10 (4), 720–26.
66.
SenguptaJaideepDahlDarren W. (2008), “Gender-Related Reactions to Gratuitous Sex Appeals in Advertising,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18 (1), 62–78.
67.
SobhRanaBelkRussellGresselJustin (2014), “Mimicry and Modernity in the Middle East: Fashion Invisibility and Young Women of the Arab Gulf,” Consumption Markets & Culture, 17 (4), 392–412.
68.
SobolKamilaClevelandMarkLarocheMichel (2018), “Globalization, National Identity, Biculturalism and Consumer Behavior: A Longitudinal Study of Dutch Consumers,” Journal of Business Research, 82 (1), 340–53.
69.
SpenceJanet T.HelmreichRobert L. (1978), Masculinity and Femininity: Their Psychological Dimensions, Correlates, and Antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.
70.
SprolesGeorge B.KendallElizabeth L. (1986), “A Methodology for Profiling Consumers’ Decision-Making Styles,” Journal of Consumer Affairs, 2 (2), 267–79.
71.
SteenkampJan-Benedict E. M.HofstedeFrenkel ter (2002), “International Market Segmentation: Issues and Perspectives,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19 (3), 185–213.
72.
SteenkampJan-Benedict E. MHofstedeFrenkel terWedelMichel (1999), “A Cross-National Investigation into the Individual and National Cultural Antecedents of Consumer Innovativeness,” Journal of Marketing, 63 (2), 55–69.
73.
TangLinghui (2017), “Mine Your Customers or Mine Your Business: The Moderating Role of Culture in Online Word-of-Mouth Reviews,” Journal of International Marketing, 25 (2), 88–110.
74.
ToobyJohnCosmidesLeda (2005), “Conceptual Foundations of Evolutionary Psychology,” in The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology, BussD. M., ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 5–67.
75.
TorkiMostafa A. (1988), “The CPI Femininity Scale in Kuwait and Egypt,” Journal of Personality Assessment, 52 (2), 247–53.
76.
UstunerTubaHoltDouglas (2007), “Dominated Consumer Acculturation: The Social Construction of Poor Migrant Women’s Consumer Identity Projects in a Turkish Squatter,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (1), 41–56.
77.
Van HerkHesterPoortingaYpe H.VerhallenTheo T. M. (2005), “Equivalence of Survey Data: Relevance for International Marketing,” European Journal of Marketing, 39 (3/4), 351–64.
WesleyScarlettLeHewMelodyWoodsideArch (2006), “Consumer Decision-Making Styles and Mall Shopping Behavior: Building Theory Using Exploratory Data Analysis and the Comparative Method,” Journal of Business Research, 59 (5), 535–48.
80.
WestjohnStanford A.RoschkHolgerMagnussonPeter (2017), “Eastern Versus Western Culture Pricing Strategy: Superstition, Lucky Numbers, and Localization,” Journal of International Marketing, 25 (1), 72–90.
81.
WilkRichard (1998), “Emulation, Imitation, and Global Consumerism,” Organization & Environment, 11 (3), 314–33.
82.
WoodWendyEaglyAlice H. (2012), “Biosocial Construction of Sex Differences and Similarities in Behavior,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ZannaM. P.OlsoJ. M., eds. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 55–123.
83.
World Economic Forum (2013), The Global Gender Gap Report 2013. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
84.
ZentnerMarcelMituraKlaudia (2012), “Stepping Out of the Caveman’s Shadow: Nations’ Gender Gap Predicts Degree of Sex Differentiation in Mate Preferences,” Psychological Science, 23 (10), 1176–85.
85.
ZhouLianxiHuiMichael K. (2003), “Symbolic Value of Foreign Products in the People’s Republic of China,” Journal of International Marketing, 11 (2), 36–58.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
