This research examines the impact of humans’ mating motivation on their attitudes toward and recall of advertising that contains words with sexual connotations (e.g., “Sexton Plumbing” and “We Sell Boxes”). Due to gender differences based on evolution-based and socialization-based approaches, this research predicts differential evaluations between men and women for advertising that contains words with sexual connotations. The results of two empirical studies reveal that men in a mating mindset condition show more positive attitudes toward advertisements containing words with sexual connotations than do men in the control condition. In contrast, a different pattern is evident for women. Women in a mating mindset show similar attitudes toward such advertisements compared to women in the control condition. A similar pattern was also found for the recall of advertisements.
BaumeisterR.F.CataneseK.R.VohsK.D.Is there a gender difference in strength of sex drive? Theoretical views, conceptual distinctions, and a review of relevant evidencePers. Soc. Psychol. Rev532001242–273
4.
BussD.M.Conflict between the sexes: strategic interference and the evocation of anger and upsetJ. Pers. Soc. Psychol5651989735–747
5.
BussD.M.Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind2012Allyn and BaconBoston
6.
CarrollJ.L.VolkK.D.HydeJ.S.Differences between males and females in motives for engaging in sexual intercourseArch. Sex. Behav1421985131–139
7.
ChangC.-T.TsengC.-H.Can sex sell bread? The impacts of sexual appeal type, product type and sensation seekingInt. J. Advert3242013559–585
8.
ChildersT.L.HoustonM.J.Conditions for a picture-superiority effect on consumer memoryJ. Consum. Res1121984643–654
9.
CohenL.L.ShotlandR.L.Timing of first sexual intercourse in a relationship: expectations, experiences, and perceptions of othersJ. Sex Res3341996291–299
10.
DahlD.W.SenguptaJ.VohsK.Sex in advertising: gender differences and the role of relationship commitmentJ. Consum. Res3622009215–231
11.
DaviesJ.ZhuH.BrantleyB.Sex appeals that appeal: negative sexual self-schema as a moderator of the priming effects of sexual ads on accessibilityJ. Curr. Issues Res. Advert292200779–89
12.
DuranteK.M.GriskeviciusV.HillS.E.PerillouxC.LiN.P.Ovulation, female competition, and product choice: hormonal influences on consumer behaviorJ. Consum. Res3762011921–934
13.
GriffittW.KaiserD.L.Affect, sex guilt, gender, and the rewarding–punishing effects of erotic stimuliJ. Pers. Soc. Psychol3681978850–858
14.
GriskeviciusV.GoldsteinN.J.MortensenC.R.CialdiniR.B.KenrickD.T.Going along versus going alone: when fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformityJ. Pers. Soc. Psychol9122006281–294
15.
GriskeviciusV.CialdiniR.B.KenrickD.T.Peacocks, Picasso, and parental investment: the effects of romantic motives on creativityJ. Pers. Soc. Psychol911200663–76
16.
GriskeviciusV.TyburJ.M.SundieJ.M.CialdiniR.B.MillerG.F.KenrickD.T.Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: when romantic motives elicit strategic costly signalsJ. Pers. Soc. Psychol931200785–102
17.
GriskeviciusV.TyburJ.M.Van den BerghB.Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservationJ. Pers. Soc. Psychol9832010392–404
18.
HanY.J.NunesJ.C.DrèzeX.Signaling status with luxury goods: the role of brand prominenceJ. Mark741201015–30
19.
HillC.A.Gender, relationship stage, and sexual behavior: the importance of partner emotional investment within specific situationsJ. Sex Res3932002228–240
20.
HolbrookM.B.Aims, concepts, and methods for the representation of individual differences in esthetics responses to design featuresJ. Consum. Res1331986337–347
21.
HolbrookM.B.MooreW.L.Feature interactions in consumer judgments of verbal versus pictorial presentationsJ. Consum. Res5141981103–113
22.
JanssensK.PandelaereM.Van den BerghB.MilletK.LensI.RoeK.Can buy me love: mate attraction goals lead to perceptual readiness for status productsJ. Exp. Soc. Psychol4712011254–258
23.
KenrickD.T.GriskeviciusV.NeubergS.L.SchallerM.Renovating the pyramid of needs contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundationsPerspect. Psych. Sci532010292–314
24.
KimS.KimJ.The influence of hedonic versus utilitarian consumption situations on the compromise effectMark. Lett2722016387–401
25.
LaTourM.S.Female nudity in print advertising: an analysis of gender differences in arousal and ad responsePsych. Mark71199065–81
26.
LaTourM.S.HenthorneT.L.Ethical judgments of sexual appeals in print advertisingJ. Advert233199481–90
27.
LiN.P.KenrickD.T.Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: what, whether, and whyJ. Pers. Soc. Psychol9032006468–489
28.
MacKenzieS.B.LutzR.J.An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting contextJ. Mark532198948–65
29.
McKenzie-MohrD.ZannaM.P.Treating women as sexual objects: look to the (gender schematic) male who has viewed pornographyPers. Soc. Psychol. Bull1621990296–308
30.
MillerG.Spent: Sex, Evolution, and Consumer Behavior2009VikingNew York
31.
MitchellA.A.The effect of verbal and visual components of advertisements on brand attitudes and attitude toward the advertisementJ. Consum. Res131198612–24
32.
MongaA.B.Gürhan-CanliZ.The influence of mating mind-sets on brand extension evaluationJ. Mark. Res4942012581–593
33.
OliverM.B.HydeJ.S.Gender differences in sexuality: a meta-analysisPsychol. Bull1141199329–51
34.
OrthU.R.MalkewitzK.BeeC.Gender and personality drivers of consumer mixed emotional response to advertisingJ. Curr. Issues Res. Advert321201069–80
35.
PetersonR.A.KerinR.A.The female role in advertisements: some experimental evidenceJ. Mark414197759–63
36.
PutrevuS.Exploring the origins and information processing differences between men and women: implications for advertisersAcad. Mark. Sci. Rev10120011–14
37.
ReichertT.Sex in advertising research: a review of content, effects, and functions of sexual information in consumer advertisingAnnu. Rev. Sex Res1312002241–273
38.
ReichertT.LaTourM.S.KimJ.Assessing the influence of gender and sexual self-schema on affective responses to sexual content in advertisingJ. Curr. Issues Res. Advert292200757–71
39.
RozinP.HormesJ.M.FaithM.S.WansinkB.Is meat male? A quantitative multimethod framework to establish metaphoric relationshipsJ. Consum. Res3932012629–643
40.
SchlingerM.J.R.AlwittL.F.McCarthyK.E.GreenL.Effects of time compression on attitudes and information processingJ. Mark471198379–85
41.
SenguptaJ.DahlD.Gender-related reactions to gratuitous sex appeals in advertisingJ. Consum. Psych181200862–78
42.
SundieJ.M.KenrickD.T.GriskeviciusV.TyburJ.M.VohsK.D.BealD.J.Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: conspicuous consumption as a sexual signaling systemJ. Pers. Soc. Psychol10042011664–680
43.
TownsendC.KahnB.E.The “visual preference heuristic”: the influence of visual versus verbal depiction on assortment processing, perceived variety, and choice overloadJ. Consum. Res4052014993–1015
44.
TriversR.L.Parental investment and sexual selectionCampbellB.Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–19711972AldineChicago136–179
45.
VohsK.D.SenguptaJ.DahlD.W.The price had better be right: women's reactions to sexual stimuli vary with market factorsPsychol. Sci2512013278–283
46.
WyerR.S.HungI.W.JiangY.Visual and verbal processing strategies in comprehension and judgmentJ. Consum. Psych1842008244–257
47.
ZahaviA.ZahaviA.The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin's Puzzle1997Oxford University PressNew York
