Contextual and essentialist explanations of how couples 'interactions are gendered were compared by examining the relationship between demanding and withdrawing within couples and the partners'involvements outside the couple. Data consisted of questionnaire reports completed independently by partners in 62 heterosexual couples. Results showed that wives were more often in the demanding/pursuing role than were their husbands, but that this pattern also was significantly correlated with the partners' outside involvements. The magnitude of demanding-and-withdrawing and pursuing-and-distancing was higher in couples in which one partner was more involved than the other in his or her career In addition, gender differences in who demands and who withdraws were more pronounced when wives had greater involvement with their families of origin than husbands had with theirs. Results are discussed in terms of relevance to the debate on gender stereotypes and implications for couples therapy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Balswick, J.
(1988). The inexpressive male. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
2.
Biernat, M.
, & Wortman, C. B. (1991). Sharing of home responsibilities between professionally employed women and their husbands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 844-860.
3.
Burleson, B. R.
(1982). The development of comforting communication skills in childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 53, 1578-1588.
4.
Chodorow, N.
(1978). The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5.
Christensen, A.
(1987). Detection of conflictpatterns in couples. In K. Hahlweg & M. J. Goldstein (Eds.), Understanding major mental disorders: The contribution of family interaction research (pp. 250-265). New York: Family Process.
6.
Christensen, A.
(1988). Dysfunctional interaction patterns in couples. In P. Noller & M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Perspectives on marital interaction (pp. 31-52). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
7.
Christensen, A.
, & Heavey, C. L. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 73-81.
8.
Christensen, A.
, & Shenk, J. (1991). Communication, conflict, and psychological distance in nondistressed, clinic and divorcing couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 458-463.
9.
Christensen, A., & Sullaway, M. (1984). Communication Patterns Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles.
10.
Derlega, V. J.
, & Berg, J. H. (1987). Self-disclosure: Theory, research, and therapy. New York: Plenum.
11.
Dinnerstein, D.
(1976). The mermaid and the minotaur. New York: Harper & Row.
12.
Fogarty, T. F.
(1976). Marital crisis. In P. J. Guerin (Ed.), Family therapy: Theory and practice (pp. 325-334). New York: Gardner.
13.
Gilligan, C.
(1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
Gottman, J. M.
, & Levenson, R. W. (1986). Assessing the role of emotion in marriage. Behavioral Assessment, 8, 31-48.
15.
Gray, J.
(1992). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus. New York: HarperCollins.
16.
Heavey, C. L.
, Layne, C., & Christensen, A. (1993). Gender and conflict structure in marital interaction: A replication. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 16-27.
17.
Jones, E.
, & Gallois, C. (1989). Spouses' impressions of rules for communication in public and private marital conflicts. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 957-967.
18.
Kerr, M.
, & Bowen, M. (1988). Family evaluation. New York: Norton.
19.
Margolin, G.
, Talovic, S., & Weinstein, C. D. (1983). Areas of Change Questionnaire: A practical approach to marital assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 920-931.
20.
Miller, J. B.
(1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon.
21.
Miller, L.
, Berg, J. H., & Archer, R. L. (1983). Openers: Individuals who elicit intimate self-disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1234-1244.
22.
Minuchin, S.
(1974). Families andfamily therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Napier, A. Y.
(1978). The rejection-intrusion pattern: Acentral family dynamic. Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling, 4, 5-12.
24.
Noller, P.
, & Gallois, C. (1986). Sending emotional messages in marriage: Nonverbal behaviour, sex and communication clarity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 287-297.
25.
Peplau, L. A.
, & Gordon, S. L. (1985). Women and men in love: Gender differences in close heterosexual relationships. In V. E. O'Leary, R. K. Unger, & B. S. Wallston (Eds.), Women, gender, and social psychology (pp. 257-291). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Pratt, M. W.
, Golding, G., Huster, W., & Sampson, R. (1989). Sex differences in adult moral orientation. Journal of Personality, 56, 373-391.
27.
Robinson, J. P.
(1977). How Americans use time. New York: Praeger.
28.
Rubin, L. B.
(1983). Intimate strangers: Men and women together. New York: Harper & Row.
29.
Rubin, Z.
, Hill, C. T., Peplau, L. A., & Dunkel-Schetter, C. (1980). Self-disclosure in dating couples: Sex roles and the ethic of openness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 305-317.
30.
Rusbult, C. E.
, Johnson, D. J., & Morrow, G. D. (1986). Impact of couple patterns of problem solving in distress and nondistress in dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 744-753.
31.
Schaap, C.
, Buunk, A. P., & Kerkstra, A. (1988). Marital conflict resolution. In P. Noller & M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Perspectives on marital interaction (pp. 203-244). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
32.
Tannen, D.
(1990). You just don't understand. New York: William Morrow.
33.
Watzlawick, P.
, Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton.
34.
Wheeler, L.
, & Nezlek, J. (1977). Sex differences in social participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 742-754.
35.
Wright, P. H.
(1988). Interpreting research on gender differences in friendship: A case for moderation and a plea for caution. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 367-373.
