Elderly individuals have historically been valued as cultural and knowledge bearers. However, in modern metropolitan areas, evolving societal roles and a widening generational gap present challenges to their social integration. This study aims to develop a sociographic profile of elderly parents in urban settings, focusing on their social and economic status, health, and prospects for active lifestyles. Using the international questionnaire “Generational Solidarity: Elderly Parents and Family Relations” and validated analysis techniques, a survey was conducted among 363 Muscovites aged 65–74. The findings reveal that most elderly individuals are not socially isolated and actively support family members. They typically cohabit with 2–3 relatives, engage in intellectual pursuits, and participate moderately in public activities. Despite this, 75% face health challenges, 25% report disabilities, and 50% have low incomes. The study highlights their dual role as caregivers and active participants in family life despite economic and health constraints. The results have practical implications for improving elderly well-being through enhanced healthcare, strengthened familial bonds, and opportunities for leisure in the cultural and tourism sectors. Further research into the lives of elderly parents can promote their physical and social welfare, contributing to their active longevity and integration into urban social dynamics.
AmbagtsheerR. C.BorgK.TownsinL.de PlazaM. P.O'BrienL. M.KunwarR.LawlessM. T. (2024). The effectiveness of technology interventions in reducing social isolation and loneliness among community-dwelling older people: A mixed methods systematic review. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus, 1(1), 100008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aggp.2024.100008
2.
AsanteS.TuffourG. (2022). Social isolation and loneliness in older adults: Why proper conceptualization matters. Journal of Ageing and Longevity, 2(3), 206–213. https://doi.org/10.3390/jal2030017
3.
BarashkovaK. D. (2020). Behavioral and value attitudes of an elderly family. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University. N.I. Lobachevsky. Series: Social Sciences, 1(57), 124–130.
4.
BarrenetxeaJ.YangY.PanA.FengQ.KohW. P. (2022). Social disconnection and living arrangements among older adults: The Singapore Chinese health study. Gerontology, 68(3), 330–338. https://doi.org/10.1159/000516626
5.
Cavallotti, R., Grau-Grau, M., Marimon, F. and Gas-Aixendri, M. (2017). Design and validation of a measurement scale of intergenerational family solidarity. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 24, 107–125. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM24.1.7.
6.
Cohn-SchwartzE.SchaferM. H.AyalonL. (2022). Age integration in later life social networks and self-perceptions of aging: Examining their reciprocal associations. European Journal of Ageing, 19(4), 1145–1153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-022-00688-0
FarxodjonovaN. F. (2019). Modernization and integration: Social-philosophical analysis. The Role of Science in the Formation of Modern Virtual Reality, 1, 10–12.
FilleyC. M. (2020). Social cognition and white matter: Connectivity and cooperation. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 33(1), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNN.0000000000000223
11.
GilboaY.MaeirT.WeberA.MaeirA.RotenbergS. (2019). Predictors of community reintegration and quality of life after hip fracture among community-dwelling older adults. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 42(3), 234–239. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000355
12.
GurkoT. A. (2021). Evolution and transformation of the institution of marriage: Analysis of empirical indicators. Sociological Research, 5, 58–69. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250014117-1
HankK. (2007). Proximity and contacts between older parents and their children: A European comparison. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(1), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00351.x
16.
HuxholdO.FioriK. L.WindsorT. (2022). Rethinking social relationships in adulthood: The differential investment of resources model. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 26(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683211067035
17.
KenkmannA.GhanemC. (2024). ‘Successful ageing’ needs a future: Older incarcerated adults’ views on ageing in prison. Journal of Ageing and Longevity, 4(2), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.3390/jal4020006
18.
KumariM. (2020). Social, economic and physical problems of old age people: A case study of Patna district. Plant Archives, 20, 318–322.
19.
LuoM.DingD.BaumanA.NeginJ.PhongsavanP. (2020). Social engagement pattern, health behaviors and subjective well-being of older adults: An international perspective using WHO-SAGE survey data. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7841-7
20.
MaestasN.MullenK. J.PowellD. (2023). The effect of population aging on economic growth, the labor force, and productivity. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 15(2), 306–332. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20190196
21.
MaslovsckaiaO.KopevaA.MatveievaM.IvanovaO.KhrapkoO. (2021). Architectural typology of intergenerational shared sites. In VdivinE. (Ed.), 2nd International Scientific Conference on Socio-Technical Construction and Civil Engineering (STCCE – 2021) (Vol. 274, p. 01005). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127401005
MorganT.WilesJ.ParkH.Moeke-MaxwellT.DewesO.BlackS.GottM. (2021). Social connectedness: What matters to older people?Ageing & Society, 41(5), 1126–1144. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X1900165X
24.
MpofuE.ZhanR. F.YinC.BrockK. (2024). Qualities of older adults’ family and friendship relationships and their association with life satisfaction. Geriatrics, 9(2), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics9020049
25.
Nissanholtz-GannotR.Peretz-DayanH. (2023). Equal opportunities in aging: Income level moderates the relationship between infrequent participation in formal social activities and loneliness among older adults. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 42(9), 1982–1992. https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648231175429
26.
OghluC. N. Z. (2019). Psychological features of changes in family lifestyle during the period of old ages and senility. European Science Review, 5-6, 74–79.
27.
OphirA.PolosJ. (2022). Care life expectancy: Gender and unpaid work in the context of population aging. Population Research and Policy Review, 41(1), 197–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-021-09640-z
28.
PaivaA. F.CunhaC.VossG.DelerueM. A. (2023). The interrelationship between social connectedness and social engagement and its relation with cognition: A study using SHARE data. Ageing & Society, 43(8), 1735–1753. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X2100129X
PengC.ChengQ.YipP. S. (2022). Does gender difference exist in typologies of intergenerational relations? Adult son–parent and daughter–parent relations in Hong Kong. Journal of Family Issues, 44(7), 1904–1927. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X211066954
31.
PlužarićJ.BaraćI.IlakovacV.LovrićR.FarčićN.MudriŽBarišićM.PavlićI. (2023). Connectedness and successful aging of older adults in Croatia. Sustainability, 15(14), 10843. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151410843
32.
RanjanN. (2023). Understanding epistemology and methodology in Adolph Lowe’s political economics. Journal of Economic Sciences: Theory & Practice, 80(1), 35–53.
33.
Rivero, Z. B. and Gas, A. M. (2018). The family as a resource of intergenerational solidarity relations. Specific applications for ageing societies: The case of Spain. Logos et Prax-is, 17(4), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2018.4.11.
34.
SheinerL. (2021). The long-term impact of aging on the federal budget. In ClarkR. L.LeeY. W.MasonA. (Eds.), Fiscal accountability and population aging (pp. 93–117). Edward Elgar Publishing. Https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800370470.00013
35.
SolovyovA. K. (2017). Pension provision in Russia. Population, 20(1), 14–21.
36.
StewardA. T.HascheL.LaserJ. A. (2022). Do internalized age stereotypes mediate the relationship between volunteering and social connectedness for adults 50+?Journal of Aging Studies, 61, 101031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2022.101031
37.
TripathiS.KutsenkoE.BoosV. (2022). How different patterns of urbanization affect regional innovation? Evidence from Russia. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 26(2), 213–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2021.1942165
