This article examines the Netflix series Adolescence (2025) to explore how misogynistic ideologies influence the formation of masculinity during adolescence, emphasizing themes of hate, belonging, and digital socialization. Through narrative inquiry and cinema therapy lenses, the analysis reveals the profound psychological impacts of online misogyny and peer victimization, underscoring the dangerous allure of belonging that extremist digital communities offer vulnerable young males. Drawing upon experiences from working in juvenile detention centers, the authors highlight the ethical imperative to authentically represent marginalized adolescent narratives. Additionally, the article addresses systemic gaps in parental awareness, institutional accountability, and societal preparedness to mitigate these digital risks. Concluding with recommendations for integrated clinical, educational, and policy-based interventions, this article calls for collective action to foster healthier masculinities, emotional resilience, and digital literacy among adolescents navigating complex online landscapes.
AlexanderI. E. (1990). Personality, psychological assessment, and psychobiography. In PervinL. A. (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 529–565). Guilford Press.
2.
AlperM.KatzV. S.ClarkL. S. (2018). Researching children, intersectionality, and diversity in the digital age. In Children, adolescents, and Media (pp. 129–136). Routledge.
3.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice-Hall.
4.
BatesL. (2020). Men who hate women. Simon & Schuster.
5.
BrownG. L.MangelsdorfS. C.NeffC. (2012). Father involvement, paternal sensitivity, and father−child attachment security in the first 3 years. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(3), 421. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027836
6.
CinelliM.MoralesG.GaleazziA.QuattrociocchiW.StarniniM. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9), e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118
7.
ClandininD. J.ConnellyF. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.
8.
DavidC.WoodrowH.ScottJ.AthinaM.ZubairS. (2023). A scientific approach to tech accountability. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology.
9.
DermerS. B.HutchingsJ. B. (2000). Utilizing movies in family therapy: Applications for individuals, couples, and families. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 28(2), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/019261800261789
10.
EnockF. E.StevensF.BrightJ.CrossM.JohanssonP.WajcmanJ.MargettsH. Z. (2024). Understanding gender differences in experiences and concerns surrounding online harms: A short report on a nationally representative survey of UK adults. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00463
11.
EriksonE. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. W. W. Norton.
12.
FaircloughN. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
13.
GeeJ. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (4th ed.). Routledge.
14.
HaslopC.RingroseJ.CambazogluI.MilneB. (2024). Mainstreaming the manosphere’s misogyny through affective homosocial currencies: Exploring how teen boys navigate the Andrew Tate effect. Social Media + Society, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241228811
15.
HindujaS.PatchinJ. W. (2018). Connecting adolescent suicide to the severity of bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 17(4), 302–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2018.1492417
16.
KimballH. G.FernandezF.MoskowitzK. A.KangM.AlexanderL. M.ConwayK. P.MerikangasK. R.SalumG. A.MilhamM. P. (2023). Parent-perceived benefits and harms associated with internet use by adolescent offspring. JAMA Network Open, 6(10), e2339851. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.39851
17.
MarshI.MelvilleG. (2019). Crime, justice and the media (3rd ed.). Routledge.
18.
PuriA.SharmaR. (2016). Internet usage, depression, social isolation and loneliness amongst adolescents. Indian Journal of Health & Wellbeing, 7(10), 996–1003.
19.
RajaeiA.AbrahamD. (2024). From screen to reality: Exploring the profound themes of adoption in ‘this is Us’ and their real-world implications. The Family Journal, 33(2), 226–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/10664807241292055. Original work published 2025
20.
RajaeiA.AbrahamD.SafaviP.TaylorC. (2025). From apprentice to presidency: A narrative hermeneutic analysis of donald trump’s journey through the apprentice. International Journal of Systemic Therapy, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/2692398X.2025.2477329
21.
RiddleS.HickeyA.PocockC.McKeeA.SkyeD.WallisR. (2023). Moving beyond deficit media figurations of young people: Troubling the contemporary ‘youth crime crisis’. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 37(6), 756–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2024.2313565
22.
SohP. C. H.ChewK. W.KoayK. Y.AngP. H. (2018). Parents vs peers’ influence on teenagers’ internet addiction and risky online activities. Telematics and Informatics, 35(1), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.11.003
23.
ThimmV. (2025). Bringing intersectionality to the core of social and cultural anthropology: Scaling holistic intersectionality. Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology, 90(1), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2023.2226833
24.
WhiteM.EpstonD. (1990). Narrative means to therapeutic ends. Norton.
25.
WongY. J.HoM.-H. R.WangS.-Y.MillerI. S. K. (2017). Meta-analyses of the relationship between conformity to masculine norms and mental health-related outcomes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000176
