Objective: Mentalizing, or the ability to understand and interpret the mental states of oneself and others, plays a fundamental role in the quality of couples’ relationships. This qualitative study was conducted to discover the facilitating factors of mentalizing in marital relationships. Methods: Thematic analysis was used to identify the main and meaningful patterns in the interview data with couples. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 14 couples who had been together for at least 2 years. Results: Based on the findings of this research, the factors facilitating mentalizing in couples’ relationships were discovered in three main themes: content factors (emotional literacy, cognitive insight, and knowledge of the partner), process factors (effective communication, empathetic engagement, conflict resolution, humor, curiosity, and patience), and content-process factors (contextual understanding, flexibility, and shared emotional regulation). Conclusions: These themes offer valuable insights into how partners understand and connect, providing a comprehensive framework for facilitating mentalizing in intimate relationships.
AbelaA.PiscopoS.VellaS. (2020). Understanding love relationships in a global context: Supporting couples across cultures. In AbelaA.VellaS.PiscopoS. (Eds.), Couple relationships in a global context: Understanding love and intimacy across cultures (pp. 3–17). Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
2.
AllenJ. G.FonagyP.BatemanA. W. (2008). Mentalizing in clinical practice. American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.
3.
ArioliM.CattaneoZ.RicciardiE.CanessaN. (2021). Overlapping and specific neural correlates for empathizing, affective mentalizing, and cognitive mentalizing: A coordinate-based meta-analytic study. Human Brain Mapping, 42(14), 4777–4804. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25570
4.
AsenE.FonagyP. (2021). Mentalization-based treatment with families. Guilford Publications.
5.
AvryS.MolinariG.BétrancourtM.ChanelG. (2020). Sharing emotions contributes to regulating collaborative intentions in group problem-solving. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1160. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01160
6.
BatemanA.FonagyP.CampbellC.LuytenP.DebbanéM. (2023). Cambridge guide to mentalization-based treatment (MBT). Cambridge University Press.
7.
BatemanA. W.FonagyP. (2019). Handbook of mentalizing in mental health practice. American Psychiatric Pub.
8.
BerthelotN.LaroucheK.Garon-BissonnetteJ.DeschênesK.Drouin-MaziadeC.LemieuxR. (2024). Spillover effects on the relationship with the partner of a mentalization-based intervention for pregnant women. Infant Mental Health Journal, 45(4), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.22113
9.
BlakeS.JanssensA.EwingJ.BarlowA. (2021). Reflections on joint and individual interviews with couples: A multi-level interview mode. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211016733
10.
BleibergE.SafierE.FonagyP. (2023). Mentalization-based couple therapy. In A. S. Gurman, J. L. Lebow, & D. K. Snyder (Eds.), Clinical handbook of couple therapy (6th ed., pp. 175–198). The Guilford Press.
11.
BlochL.HaaseC. M.LevensonR. W. (2014). Emotion regulation predicts marital satisfaction: More than a wives’ tale. Emotion, 14(1), 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034272
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
14.
BrownS. L.ManningW. D.PayneK. K. (2017). Relationship quality among cohabiting versus married couples. Journal of Family Issues, 38(12), 1730–1753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X15622236
15.
CainJ. (2019). We should pay more attention to student curiosity. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 11(7), 651–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2019.03.001
16.
ChișR.IgnatS.RadD.MacsingaI. (2022). The mediation role of an individual’s and couple’s psychological factors, including parenting in the prediction of relational and marital satisfaction. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 11011. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191711011
17.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
18.
ElliottR.TimulakL. (2021). Essentials of descriptive-interpretive qualitative research: A generic approach. American Psychological Association.
19.
EulerS.NolteT.ConstantinouM.GriemJ.MontagueP. R.FonagyP. (2021). Interpersonal problems in borderline personality disorder: Associations with mentalizing, emotion regulation, and impulsiveness. Journal of Personality Disorders, 35(2), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi_2019_33_427
20.
FeredayJ.Muir-CochraneE. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
FonagyP.AllisonE. (2014). The role of mentalizing and epistemic trust in the therapeutic relationship. Psychotherapy, 51(3), 372–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036505
23.
FonagyP.CampbellC. (2017). Mentalizing, attachment and epistemic trust: How psychotherapy can promote resilience. Psychiatria Hungarica: A Magyar Pszichiatriai Tarsasag Tudomanyos Folyoirata, 32(3), 283–287.
24.
FonagyP.LuytenP. (2009). A developmental, mentalizing-based approach to the understanding and treatment of borderline personality disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 21(4), 1355–1381. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579409990198
25.
GhanbariS.AsgarizadehA.VahidiE.Seyed MousaviP. S.OmidghaemiM. (2023). Emotion dysregulation as mediator between mentalizing capacity and affective states: An exploratory study. PCN reports: Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 2(3), e124. https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.124
26.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2(163–194), 105.
27.
HookerC. I.VeroskyS. C.GermineL. T.KnightR. T.D'EspositoM. (2008). Mentalizing about emotion and its relationship to empathy. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3(3), 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsn019
28.
HudsonN.LawC.CulleyL.MitchellH.DennyE.Raine-FenningN. (2020). Conducting dyadic, relational research about endometriosis: A reflexive account of methods, ethics and data analysis. Health, 24(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459318786539
29.
JańczakM. O. (2021). What’s on your mind (Vol. 10).
30.
JesseeA.MangelsdorfS. C.WongM. S.Schoppe-SullivanS. J. (2018). The role of reflective functioning in predicting marital and coparenting quality. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(1), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0874-6
31.
KivityY.LevyK. N.JohnsonB. N.RosensteinL. K.LeBretonJ. M. (2024). Mentalizing in and out of awareness: A meta-analytic review of implicit and explicit mentalizing. Clinical Psychology Review, 108, 102395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102395
32.
KliemannD.AdolphsR. (2018). The social neuroscience of mentalizing: Challenges and recommendations. Current Opinion in Psychology, 24, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.015
33.
KuglerL.KuhbandnerC. (2015). That’s not funny!—But it should be: Effects of humorous emotion regulation on emotional experience and memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1296. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01296
34.
LassriD.Gewirtz-MeydanA. (2024). Breaking the cycle: Mentalizing moderates and mediates the link between childhood sexual abuse and satisfaction with adult romantic relationships. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 17, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001692
35.
LinT.SimonJ. C.GutsellJ. N. (2024). The association between emotional expressions and empathic accuracy. Research Square, rs.3.rs-3858053. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3858053/v1
36.
LuytenP.CampbellC.AllisonE.FonagyP. (2020). The mentalizing approach to psychopathology: State of the art and future directions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 16(1), 297–325. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-071919-015355
37.
MacIntoshH. B.FletcherK.AinsworthL. (2019). Measuring mentalizing in emotionally focused therapy for couples with childhood sexual abuse survivors and their partners. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 18(4), 303–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2019.1590274
38.
MarszałM.GórskaD. (2015). The regulative function of mentalization and mindfulness in borderline personality organization. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 3(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2015.50208
39.
McCannD. (2022). Thinking under fire: Mentalization-based couple therapy for high conflict and domestically abusive couples’. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 78(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23296
40.
NowellL. S.NorrisJ. M.WhiteD. E.MoulesN. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
41.
NybergV.HertzmannL. (2018). A partnership of two therapeutic models: The development of mentalization based treatment couple therapy (MBT–CT) within a psychoanalytic framework. Couple and Family Psychoanalysis, 8(1), 23–37.
42.
PetersenR.BrakouliasV.LangdonR. (2016). An experimental investigation of mentalization ability in borderline personality disorder. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 64, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.10.004
43.
PowersJ. P.CapistranoC. G.McIntoshD. N.BedacarratzA. M.McRaeK. (2023). Reappraisal and mentalizing: Perceived difficulty and effects on negative emotion. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 23(2), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001104
44.
SchroederJ.FishbachA. (2024). Feeling known predicts relationship satisfaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 111, 104559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104559
45.
SchwarzerN. H.HeimN.GingelmaierS.FonagyP.NolteT. (2024). Mentalizing as a predictor of well-being and emotion regulation: Longitudinal evidence from a community sample of young adults. Psychological Reports, 332941241261902. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941241261902
46.
Schwarzer, N. H., Nolte, T., Fonagy, P., & Gingelmaier, S. (2021). Mentalizing and emotion regulation: Evidence from a nonclinical sample. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 30(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/0803706X.2021
47.
SetoodehZ.JavdanM.TaghinejadN. (2024). Comparing the effectiveness of mentalization based treatment and positive psychology intervention in mistrust and alienation among homeless women. Iranian Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.22034/3.1.135
SouranderJ.LaaksoM. L.KallandM. (2021). Mentalization-based families first group intervention for first-time parents: Parents’ perspective. Journal of Infant, Child, and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 20(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/15289168.2021.1872148
50.
TrombettaT.RizzoM.GattinoS.RollèL. (2024). Violence in the family of origin, mentalization, and intimate partner violence perpetration. Partner Abuse, 15(3), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1891/PA-2023-0039
51.
WuH.FungB. J.MobbsD. (2022). Mentalizing during social interaction: The development and validation of the interactive mentalizing questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 791835. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.791835
52.
YucelD. (2018). The dyadic nature of relationships: Relationship satisfaction among married and cohabiting couples. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 13(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-017-9505-z
53.
ZmigrodL.RentfrowP. J.RobbinsT. W. (2020). The partisan mind: Is extreme political partisanship related to cognitive inflexibility?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(3), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000661
