This qualitative study explored the process of maintaining intimacy among graduate counseling students in long-term marriages. Recognizing that stressors of graduate school can challenge marital relationships, the study used grounded theory methodology to analyze the experiences of nine participants enrolled in Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP)-accredited counseling programs. The emergent themes include choice and intention, connection and communication, acceptance of growth and change, identifying and supporting needs, and sharing dreams and interests. These themes collectively form the maintaining marital intimacy theory, which emphasizes that intimacy in marriage evolves and requires intentional effort, especially with graduate study academic and personal demands. Findings highlight the complex and dynamic nature of intimacy, providing insights for counselors, supervisors, and counselor educators on fostering supportive environments for students. Implications suggest the importance of addressing unique relationship challenges married graduate students face to promote their overall well-being and academic success.
AllenH. K.BarrallA. L.VincentK. B.ArriaA. M. (2021). Stress and burnout among graduate students: Moderation by sleep duration and quality. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 28(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-020-09867-8
2.
AmatoP. R.PrevitiD. (2003). People’s reasons for divorcing: Gender, social class, the life course, and adjustment. Journal of Family Issues, 24(5), 602–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X03024005002
3.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
4.
BachandL. L.CaronS. L. (2011). Ties that bind: A qualitative study of happy long-term marriages. Contemporary Family Therapy, 23(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007828317271
5.
BarryK. M.WoodsM.WarneckeE.StirlingC. M. (2018). Psychological health of doctoral candidates, study-related challenges and perceived performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(3), 468–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1425979
6.
BloombergL. D.VolpeM. (2018). Completing your qualitative dissertation: A road map from beginning to end (4th ed.). Sage.
7.
BloomeD.AngS. (2020). Marriage and divorce. In MichaelR. T. (Ed.), The new social economics (pp. 87–104). University of Chicago Press.
8.
BogdanI.TurliucM. N.CandelO. S. (2022). Transition to parenthood and marital satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 901362. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.901362
9.
BrownK.Anderson-JohnsonP.McPhersonA. N. (2016). Academic-related stress among graduate students in nursing in a Jamaican school of nursing. Nurse Education in Practice, 20(1), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2016.08.004.
10.
BrownS. L.Fen-LinH.MellencampK. A. (2022). Marital age heterogamy and marital dissolution: The importance of gender and age norms. Journal of Marriage and Family, 84(1), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12775
11.
BusaccaL. A.BeebeR. S.TomanS. M. (2010). Life and work values of counselor trainees: A national survey. The Career Development Quarterly, 59(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2010.tb00126.x
12.
CaesensG.StinglhamberF.LuypaertG. (2014). The impact of work engagement and workaholism on well-being. Career Development International, 19(7), 813–835. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-09-2013-0114
13.
CharmazK. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
14.
ClarkH. K.MurdockN. L.KoettingK. (2009). Predicting burnout and career choice satisfaction in counseling psychology graduate students. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(4), 580–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000008319985
ConnellyL. M. (2016 Nov). Trustworthiness in qualitative research. Medsurg Nursing, 25(6), 435–436. PMID: 30304614.
17.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
18.
DevorC. S.StewartS. D.DoriusC. (2018). Parental divorce, social capital, and postbaccalaurate educational attainment among young adults. Journal of Family Issues, 39(10), 2806–2835. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X18760349
19.
DuffeyT.WootenH. R.LumadueC. A. (2004). The influence of intimacy and emotional distance on sexual satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 30(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926230490262392
20.
EfevberaY.BhabhaJ. (2020). Defining and deconstructing girl child marriage and applications to global public health. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1545. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09545-0
21.
El-GhorouryN. H.GalperD. I.SawaqdehA.BufkaL. F. (2012). Stress, coping, and barriers to wellness among psychology graduate students. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 6(2), 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028768
EvansT. M.BiraL.GastelumJ. B.WeissL. T.VanderfordN. L. (2018). Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education. Nature Biotechnology, 36(3), 282–284. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.408
26.
FerreiraT.NarcisoI.NovoR. (2012). Intimacy, sexual desire, and differentiation in couple relationships. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 38(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2011.569639
27.
GaoG. (2001). Intimacy, passion and commitment in Chinese and US American romantic relationships. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 25(3), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0147-1767(01)00007-4
28.
Garcia-WilliamsA. G.MoffittL.KaslowN. J. (2014). Mental health and suicidal behavior among graduate students. Academic Psychiatry, 38(5), 554–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-014-0041-y
29.
GeistC. (2017). The shifting nature of cohabitation and its impact on marital stability. Demographic Research, 37(48), 1581–1612. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.37.48
30.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
31.
GoldJ. M. (2006). Exploring marital satisfaction among graduate students: Implications for service delivery. The Family Journal, 14(4), 417–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480706290979
32.
GreefA. P.MalherbeH. L. (2001). Intimacy and marital satisfaction in spouses. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 27(3), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/009262301750257100
33.
GutierrezD.MullenP. R.FoxJ. (2017). Exploring emotional intelligence among master’s-level counseling trainees. Counselor Education and Supervision, 56(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12057
34.
JacobS. A.FurgersonS. P. (2012). Writing interview protocols and conducting interviews: Tips for students new to the field of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 17(42), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2012.1718
35.
JohnsonS. M. (2019). The practice of emotionally focused couple therapy: Creating connection (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Kardan-SourakiM.HamzehgardeshiZ.AsadpourI.MohammadpourR. A.KhaniS. A. (2016). Review of marital intimacy-enhancing interventions among married individuals. Global Journal of Health Science, 8(8), 74–93. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v8n8p74
38.
KimM. (2013). The effect of marital intimacy, sex communication, and sexual satisfaction on the marital satisfaction for Korean middle-aged women. Journal of Next Generation Information Technology, 4(8), 441–448.
39.
KorstjensI.MoserA. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375092
LaurenceauJ. P.BarrettL. F.PietromonacoP. R. (2005). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1238–1251. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1238
42.
LegakoM. A.Lehmann-SorensenB. (2000). The effects of graduate study on marital satisfaction. Journal of College Student Development, 41(6), 679–690. https://muse.jhu.edu/journal/238
43.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986(30), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1427
NelsonN. G.Dell’OliverC.KochC. (2001). Stress, coping, and success among graduate students in clinical psychology. Psychological Reports, 88(3), 759–767. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.88.3.759–767
Pedro SobralM.Emília CostaM. (2015). Development of the fear of intimacy components questionnaire (FICQ): Embracing a dependence component. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 31(4), 302–309. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015–5759/a000238
Pew Research Center. (2021, October 5). Rising share of U.S. adults are living without a spouse or partner. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2021/10/05/rising-share-of-u-s-adults-are-living-without-a-spouse-or-partner/
52.
PfeiferT. A.KranzP. L.ScogginA. E. (2008). Perceived stress in occupational therapy students. Occupational Therapy International, 15(4), 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.256
53.
PolkinghorneD. E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.137
54.
RaleyR. K.BumpassL. (2003). The topography of the divorce plateau: Levels and trends in union stability in the United States after 1980. Demographic Research, 8(8), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2003.8.8
55.
RaleyR. K.SweeneyM. M.WondraD. (2016). The growing racial and ethnic divide in U.S. marriage patterns. Future of Children, 25(2), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2015.0014
56.
RiceK. G.SuhH.YangX.ChoeE.DavisD. E. (2016). The advising alliance for international and domestic graduate students: Measurement invariance and implications for academic stress. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63(3), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000141
57.
Rockinson-SzpakiwA. J.SpauldingL. S.KnightA. (2015). Protecting the marriage relationship during the doctoral journey: Strategies for students and partners based on the strong marital house concept. The Family Journal, 23(2), 141–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480714565106
58.
RogersT.SnowM.ReysenR.WinburnA.MazahrehL. (2015). The self of the counselor: Exploring adult attachment styles in counselors-in-training. Journal of Counselor Practice, 5(2), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.22229/eas635180
59.
SasslerS.LichterD. T. (2020). Cohabitation and marriage: Complexity and diversity in union-formation patterns. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 35–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12617
SbarraD. A.SmithH. L.MehlM. R. (2012). When leaving your ex, love yourself: Observational ratings of self-compassion predict the course of emotional recovery following marital separation. Psychological Science, 23(3), 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611429466
62.
SchoenR.StandishN. (2001). The retrenchment of marriage: Results from marital status life tables for the United States, 1995. Population and Development Review, 27(3), 553–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728–4457.2001.00553.x
63.
SchoferE.MeyerJ. W. (2005). The worldwide expansion of higher education in the twentieth century. American Sociological Review, 70(6), 898–920. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000602
64.
ScottS. B.RhoadesG. K.StanleyS. M.AllenE. S.MarkmanH. J. (2013). Reasons for divorce and recollections of premarital intervention: Implications for improving relationship education. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 2(2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032025
65.
SimJ.SaundersB.WaterfieldJ.KingstoneT. (2018). Can sample size in qualitative research be determined a priori?International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(5), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1454643
66.
SmockP. J.SchwartzC. R. (2020). The demography of families: A review of patterns and change. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12612
67.
SoufyN.MadaniY.ShahmoradiS. (2021). Studying the influence of the academic teachings of counseling students and graduates on their perspectives about marriage and marital relationships: A qualitative study. Journal of Counseling Research, 20(78), 216–243. https://doi.org/10.18502/qjcr.v20i78.6790
68.
SuarezA. L.PerrymanK. L.CarverC. L.Del ReJ. M. (2020). An exploration of married male doctoral students in counselor education. Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision, 13(4), 1–29. https://research.library.kutztown.edu/jcps/vol13/iss4/8
69.
SverdlikA.HallC. H.McAlpineL.HubbardK. (2018). The PhD experience: A review of the factors influencing doctoral students’ completion, achievement, and well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 361–388. https://doi.org/10.28945/4113
70.
ThorntonA.AxinnW. G.XieY. (2007). Marriage and cohabitation. University of Chicago Press.
YooH.Bartle-HaringS.DayR. D.GangammaR. (2014). Couple communication, emotional and sexual intimacy, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 40(4), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2012.751072
