The aim of this study is to determine the factors that affect the quality of the time allocated to dinner eaten together and to put forth whether the scale obtained can measure the quality of the time allocated to dinner. A scale was developed to fit the purpose. The data obtained from 171 parents were analyzed. A model with six hypotheses was designated. Hypotheses were tested via structural equation modeling. According to the test results; the formative aspect of the dinner activity (Hypothesis 2) and healthiness and deliciousness of dinner (Hypothesis 3) strongly positively affect the quality of the time allocated to dinner. At the end of the study, it was concluded that the formative aspect of the dinner activity (0.676) and the healthy and delicious food (0.678) strongly positively affected the quality of the time allocated for dinner.
AgateJ. R.ZabriskieR. B.AgateS. T.PofR. (2009). Family leisure satisfaction and satisfaction with family life. Journal of Leisure Research, 41(2), 205–223.
2.
AndayaA. A.ArredondoE. M.AlcarazJ. E.LindsayS. P.ElderJ. P.(2011). The association between family meals, TV viewing during meals, and fruit and vegetables and soda and chips intake among Latino children. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 43(5), 308–315.
3.
BarthesR. (1961). Pour une psycho-sociologie de l’alimentation contemporaine [Toward a psychosociology of contemporary food consumption]. Annales Économies Sociétés Civilisations, 16(5), 977–986. https://www.persee.fr/doc/ahess_0395-2649_1961_num_16_5_420772
4.
BealsD. E.SnowC. E. (1994). “Thunder is when the angels are upstairs bowling”: Narratives and explanations at the dinner table. Journal of Narrative & Life History, 4(4), 331–352.
5.
Blum-KulkaS. (1997). Dinner talk: Cultural patterns of sociability and socialization in family discourse. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
ChristensenP. H. (2002). Why more “quality time” is not on the top of children’s lists: The “qualities of time” for children. Children & Society, 16(2), 77–88.
8.
CoffinT. E. (1955). Television’s impact on society. American Psychologist, 10(10), 630–641.
EisenbergM. E.OlsonR. E.Neumark-SztainerDStoryM.BearingerL. H. (2004). Correlations between family meals and psychosocial well-being among adolescents. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 158(8), 792–796.
11.
ElgarF. J.CraigW.TritesS. J. (2013). Family dinners, communication, and mental health in Canadian adolescents. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(4), 433–438.
12.
FeldmanS.EisenbergM. E.Neumark-SztainerD.StoryM. (2007). Associations between watching TV during family meals and dietary intake among adolescents. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 39(5), 257–263.
13.
FerdousH. S.PlodererB.DavisH.VetereF.O’haraK. (2015). Pairing technology and meals: A contextual enquiry in the family household. In: The Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction (pp. 370–379), Parkville, Victoria, Australia. ACM Press. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2838739.2838780
14.
FerdousH. S.PlodererB.DavisH.VetereF.O’haraK. (2016). Commensality and the social use of technology during family mealtime. ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interaction, 23(6), 37.
15.
FulkersonJ. A.LothK.BrueningM.BergeJ.EisenbergM. E.Neumark-SztainerD. (2014). Time 2 tlk 2nite: Youths’ use of electronic media during family meals and associations with demographic characteristics, family characteristics and foods served. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 114(7), 1053–1058.
16.
FulkersonJ. A.PaschK. E.StiglerM. H.FarbakhshK.PerryC. L.KomroK. A. (2010). Longitudinal associations between family dinner and adolescent perceptions of parent-child communication among racially diverse urban youth. Journal of Family Psychology: Journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 24(3), 261–270.
HançerlioğluO. (2000). Nitelik. Felsefe ansiklopedisi. 3. Remzi Kitabevi.
21.
HerreroJ.UrueñaA.TorresA.HidalgoA. (2019). Socially connected but still isolated: Smartphone addiction decreases social support over time. Social Science Computer Review, 37(1), 73–88.
KiserL. JMedoffDNurseWBlackM. M.FieseB. H. (2010). Family mealtime Q-sort: A measure of mealtime practices. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(1), 92–96.
LarsonN.FulkersonJ.StoryM.Neumark-SztainerD. (2013). Shared meals among young adults are associated with better diet quality and predicted by family meal patterns during adolescence. Public Health Nutrition, 16(5), 883–893.
26.
LarsonN. I.Neumark-SztainerD.HannanP. J.StoryM. (2007). Family meals during adolescence are associated with higher diet quality and healthful meal patterns during young adulthood. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 107(9), 1502–1510.
27.
LatifH. (2018). Bütüncül zaman yön. Anlayışı [Systemic sense of time management]. TURAN-SAM, 10(38), 272–275.
28.
MaccobyE. E. (1951). Television: Its impact on school children. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(3), 421–444.
29.
McIntoshW. A. (1996). Sociologies of food and nutrition. Plenum press.
30.
MestdagI.VandeweyerJ. (2005). Where has family time gone? In search of joint family activities and the role of the family meal in 1966 and 1999. Journal of Family History, 30(3), 304–323.
31.
MisraSChengLGenevieJYuanM. (2016). The iPhone effect: The quality of in-person social interactions in the presence of mobile devices. Environment and Behavior, 48(2), 275–298.
32.
MondadaL. (2009). The methodical organization of talking and eating: Assessments in dinner conversations. Food Quality and Preference, 20(8), 558–571.
33.
MorleyD. (2005). Family television: Cultural power and domestic leisure. Routledge.
34.
MoserCSchoenebeckS. Y.ReineckeK. (2016). Technology at the table: Attitudes about mobile phone use at mealtimes. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ‘16 (pp. 1881–1892), Santa Clara, California, USA. ACM Press. htttps://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858357
35.
PrzybylskiA. K.WeinsteinN. (2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), 237–246.
36.
SenftG. (2009). Phatic communion. In SenftG.ÖstmanJ. O.VerschuerenJ., (Eds.), Culture and language use (pp. 226–233). John Benjamins Publishing.
VelthovenM. H.van PowellJ.PowellG. (2018). Problematic smartphone use: Digital approaches to an emerging public health problem. Digital Health, 4(January). https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207618759167
42.
VilhelmsonB.ThulinE.ElldérE. (2017). Where does time spent on the internet come from? Tracing the influence of information and communications technology use on daily activities. Information, Communication & Society, 20(2), 250–263.
43.
WeinsteinM. (2005). The surprising power of family meals: How eating together makes us smarter, stronger, healthier and happier. Steerforth.
