Understanding variations in conjugal relationships can help counselors and clients cocreate a template for these relationships in terms of their interactions with the broader society and as related to the legal standing of sanctioned marriage. Such a framework can help clients make informed decisions about the present status and future aspirations of these relationships keeping in mind their legal standing and ramifications. This article offers a basic understanding of the practices of common-law marriage and cohabiting relationships offering implications for clinical service, preparation of knowledgeable couples’ counselors, and future study.
American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy. (2015). The revised AAMFT code of ethics. Alexandria, VA: Author.
2.
EickmeyerK. J.ManningW. D. (2018). Serial cohabitation in your adulthood: Baby boomers to millennials. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80, 826–840. doi:10.1111/jomf.12495
3.
GoldJ. M. (2013). Typologies of cohabitation: Implications for clinical practice and research. The Family Journal, 20, 315–321. doi:10.10177/1066480712449603
4.
GoodwinP. Y.MosherW. D.ChandraA. (2010). Marriage and cohabitation in the United States: A statistical portrait based on Cycle 6 (2002) of the National Survey of Family Growth (National Center for Health Statistics). Vital Health Statistics, 23, 1–55.
5.
GrossmanJ. L.FriedmanL. M. (2011). Inside the castle: Law and family in 20th century America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
6.
HuangP. M.SmockP. J.ManningW. D.Bergstrom-LynchC. A. (2011). He says, she says: Gender and cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues, 32, 876–905. doi:10.1177/0192513X1039601
7.
International Association for Marriage and Family Counselors. (2017). IAMFC code of ethics. Alexandria, VA: Author.
8.
KreidlM.HubatkovaB. (2017). Rising rates of cohabitation and the odds of repartnering: Does the gap between men and women disappear?Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 58, 487–506. doi:10.1080/10502556.2017.1343580
9.
KuperbergA. (2018). Premarital cohabitation and direct marriage in the United States: 1956–2015. Marriage & Family Review. doi:10.1080/01494929.2018.1518820
ProbertR. (2012). The legal regulation of cohabitation, 1600–2012: From fornicators to family. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
12.
RhoadesG. K.StanleyS. M.MarkmanH. J.AllenE. S. (2015). Can marriage education mitigate the risks associated with premarital cohabitation?Journal of Family Psychology, 29, 500–506. doi:10.1037/fam0000081
13.
RogersA. A.WilloughbyB. J.NelsonL. J. (2016). Young adults’ perceived purposes of emerging adulthood: Implications for cohabitation. The Journal of Psychology, 150, 485–501. doi:10.1080/00223980.2015.1099513
